Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Institution · Tulsa · United States

Osteopathic Founders Foundation

osteopathicfounders.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
19
▼ 9% vs 2018-21
Citations
258
13.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
7.7%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
50%
world 40%
International
27%
world 18%
Osteopathic Founders Foundation

Not ranked overall: Osteopathic Founders Foundation is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Osteopathic Founders Foundation work in?

In all years, 62% of research at Osteopathic Founders Foundation is in Social Sciences, 19% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (37%), Economics, Econometrics and Finance (12%), Medicine (10%). It does 2.1× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 12 fractional works · 62.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 7 fractional works · 37.1% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 11.4% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 10.6% of its workHealth: 2 fractional works · 8.6% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 12.0% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workFinance: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 5.8% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysical Sciences: 4 fractional works · 19.1% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 9.4% of its workInformation Systems: 2 fractional works · 8.3% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 7.3% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workAtmospheric Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Sciences: 2 fractional works · 13.0% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 9.9% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workResearch and Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 5.6% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKOsteopathicFounders…19fractional works, all years
Life Sciences6%Physical Sciences19%Health Sciences13%Social Sciences62%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 16 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences737.1%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance212.0%
    3. Psychology15.8%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting14.4%
    5. Decision Sciences02.6%
    6. Arts and Humanities00.4%
    1. Computer Science29.4%
    2. Engineering17.3%
    3. Mathematics01.7%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.7%
    1. Medicine29.9%
    2. Health Professions02.3%
    3. Nursing00.6%
    4. Veterinary00.3%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology12.9%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences12.7%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.80× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.52× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Computer Science: 3.28× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1.81× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.24× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringHealth Professions: 2.70× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.04× its world share, 1 worksMedicineVeterinary: 7.48× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 0.49× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.11× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.80× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.73× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 7.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 12 fields, with their numbers
  1. Veterinary7.48×0 works
  2. Computer Science3.28×1 works
  3. Health Professions2.70×0 works
  4. Earth and Planetary Sciences1.81×0 works
  5. Social Sciences1.73×1 works
  6. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.52×0 works
  7. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.11×0 works
  8. Medicine1.04×1 works
  9. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.80×0 works
  10. Psychology0.80×0 works
  11. Arts and Humanities0.49×0 works
  12. Engineering0.24×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Osteopathic Founders Foundation?

Ranked on the quality score, Kyalo Mativo and 千尋 白川 lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Osteopathic Founders Foundation.

  1. 1 Kyalo Mativo United States · #4,225,274 worldwide 37 citations · 16 works
  2. 2 千尋 白川 United States · #4,404,966 worldwide 0 citations · 31 works
All ranked researchers at Osteopathic Founders Foundation

What are the most cited papers from Osteopathic Founders Foundation?

The most cited paper from Osteopathic Founders Foundation is "Amish Study, I: Affective disorders among the Amish, 1976-1980" (Janice A. Egeland, Abram M. Hostetter, 1983), with 294 citations. Next come "Spiral Time: A Geometric Reframing of Temporal Structure and Its Applications in Machine Learning" (179) and "Amish Study, III: the impact of cultural factors on diagnosis of bipolar illness" (144).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Amish Study, I: Affective disorders among the Amish, 1976-1980 Janice A. Egeland, Abram M. Hostetter · American Journal of Psychiatry 1983 294
2 Spiral Time: A Geometric Reframing of Temporal Structure and Its Applications in Machine Learning Ajieh, Frank Open access 10 Jun 2026 179
3 Amish Study, III: the impact of cultural factors on diagnosis of bipolar illness Janice A. Egeland, Abram M. Hostetter, Suzann Eshleman · American Journal of Psychiatry 1983 144
4 Electrophysiological monitoring during selective dorsal rhizotomy, and spasticity and GMFM performance Ross M. Hays, John F. McLaughlin, Kristie F Bjornson et al. · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology Open access Apr 1998 53
5 Interim Evaluation of the Rural Health Scholars Program Deirdre C. Lynch, Sari Teplin, Stephen E. Willis et al. · Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2001 19
All 25 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Osteopathic Founders Foundation publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Educational Challenges and Innovations, Emergency Medicine Education and Research, Education, Technology, and Economics and Historical and Environmental Studies.

Educational Challenges a…0Educational Challenges and Innovations: 0 fractional worksEmergency Medicine Educa…0Emergency Medicine Education and Research: 0 fractional worksEducation, Technology, and Economics: 0 fractional worksHistorical and Environmental Studies: 0 fractional worksItalian Fascism and Post-war Society: 0 fractional worksvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches: 0 fractional worksEducational and Social Studies: 0 fractional worksBiological Research and …0Biological Research and Disease Studies: 0 fractional worksMosquito-borne diseases and control: 0 fractional worksPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare: 0 fractional works
Information SystemsEmergency MedicineSociology and Political ScienceMolecular Biology3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Educational Challenges and Innovations Information Systems 0 works
  2. 2 Emergency Medicine Education and Research Emergency Medicine 0 works
  3. 3 Education, Technology, and Economics Information Systems 0 works
  4. 4 Historical and Environmental Studies Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  5. 5 Italian Fascism and Post-war Society Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  6. 6 vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches Molecular Biology 0 works
  7. 7 Educational and Social Studies Education 0 works
  8. 8 Biological Research and Disease Studies Molecular Biology 0 works
  9. 9 Mosquito-borne diseases and control Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  10. 10 Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare Safety Research 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available49.7%not open50.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors27.3%domestic only72.7%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Osteopathic Founders Foundation's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 9% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Osteopathic Founders Foundation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000031% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%Osteopathic Founders Foundation0.000027% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Osteopathic Founders Foundation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Tulsa

All research institutions in Tulsa

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Osteopathic Founders Foundation. Posts are plain text and can be reported.