Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
University · Trondheim · Norway

Queen Maud University College

In research, Queen Maud University College stands highest in Social Sciences (#6,496 of 9,585 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Education and Psychology (Education is 8.1× its share of world research).

dmmh.no/enROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022-now
#18,499
of 22,385 · #18,626 all time
Rank in Norway
#103
of 123
Research works
348
▲ 7% vs 2018-21
Citations
4.9k
14.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
11.4%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.02×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
71%
world 40%
International
13%
world 18%
Queen Maud University College

What is Queen Maud University College known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Social SciencesDomain #6,496 of 9,585 14.2%71 #4691

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Queen Maud University College sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Queen Maud University College work in?

In 2022-now, 78% of research at Queen Maud University College is in Social Sciences, 13% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (47%), Psychology (22%), Arts and Humanities (8%). It does 2.9× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 88 fractional works · 78.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 53 fractional works · 46.8% of its workEducation: 28 fractional works · 24.9% of its workSociology and Political Science: 13 fractional works · 11.5% of its workHuman Factors and Ergonomics: 3 fractional works · 3.0% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 3 fractional works · 2.7% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workLaw: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHealth: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCommunication: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 25 fractional works · 22.0% of its workSocial Psychology: 10 fractional works · 8.6% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 7 fractional works · 6.6% of its workClinical Psychology: 7 fractional works · 6.2% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 9 fractional works · 8.0% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 2 fractional works · 2.2% of its workPhilosophy: 2 fractional works · 1.8% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workMuseology: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workReligious studies: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2 fractional works · 1.3% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBusiness and International Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 15 fractional works · 13.1% of its workHealth Professions: 7 fractional works · 6.4% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 3 fractional works · 2.4% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workOccupational Therapy: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMedicine: 7 fractional works · 6.2% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 3 fractional works · 2.9% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 7 fractional works · 6.5% of its workEnvironmental Science: 3 fractional works · 2.7% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workStatistics and Probability: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workLife Sciences: 3 fractional works · 2.2% of its workNeuroscience: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKQueen MaudUniversity…112fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences2%Physical Sciences6%Health Sciences13%Social Sciences78%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 17 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences5346.8%
    2. Psychology2522.0%
    3. Arts and Humanities98.0%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting21.3%
    5. Decision Sciences00.1%
    1. Health Professions76.4%
    2. Medicine76.2%
    3. Nursing00.3%
    4. Dentistry00.2%
    1. Environmental Science32.7%
    2. Engineering21.4%
    3. Computer Science11.3%
    4. Mathematics11.0%
    1. Neuroscience21.5%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.4%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.2%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

What does Queen Maud University College specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Education takes 8.1× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. EducationSubfield · 28.0 works8.1×
  2. PsychologyField · 24.7 works7.2×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.95× its world share, 2 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.17× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.09× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.55× its world share, 3 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 0.88× its world share, 1 worksMathematicsDentistry: 0.41× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 2.42× its world share, 7 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.32× its world share, 7 worksMedicineNursing: 0.61× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 2.76× its world share, 9 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.41× its world share, 2 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesPsychology: 7.21× its world share, 25 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 3.70× its world share, 53 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 7.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 17 fields, with their numbers
  1. Psychology7.21×25 works
  2. Social Sciences3.70×53 works
  3. Arts and Humanities2.76×9 works
  4. Health Professions2.42×7 works
  5. Neuroscience0.95×2 works
  6. Mathematics0.88×1 works
  7. Nursing0.61×0 works
  8. Environmental Science0.55×3 works
  9. Dentistry0.41×0 works
  10. Business, Management and Accounting0.41×2 works
  11. Medicine0.32×7 works
  12. Computer Science0.17×1 works
  13. Decision Sciences0.10×0 works
  14. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.09×0 works
  15. Engineering0.09×2 works
  16. Immunology and Microbiology0.07×0 works
  17. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.04×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Queen Maud University College?

Ranked on the quality score, Ellen Beate Hansen Sandseter, Rasmus Kleppe and Ole Johan Sando lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Queen Maud University College.

  1. 1 Ellen Beate Hansen Sandseter Norway · #134,935 worldwide 5.4k citations · 127 works
  2. 2 Rasmus Kleppe Norway · #586,587 worldwide 563 citations · 31 works
  3. 3 Ole Johan Sando Norway · #677,933 worldwide 686 citations · 45 works
  4. 4 Sobh Chahboun Norway · #1,254,757 worldwide 529 citations · 38 works
  5. 5 Kari Emilsen Norway · #1,824,192 worldwide 185 citations · 25 works
  6. 6 Kathrine Bjørgen Norway · #2,008,811 worldwide 236 citations · 16 works
  7. 7 Oliver Thiel Norway · #2,681,763 worldwide 178 citations · 29 works
  8. 8 Merete Moe Norway · #2,795,284 worldwide 27 citations · 16 works
  9. 9 Lise Hovik Norway · #2,809,216 worldwide 82 citations · 28 works
  10. 10 Karianne Franck Norway · #3,094,016 worldwide 83 citations · 18 works
All ranked researchers at Queen Maud University College

What are the most cited papers from Queen Maud University College?

The most cited paper from Queen Maud University College is "What is the Relationship between Risky Outdoor Play and Health in Children? A Systematic Review" (MARIANA J. BRUSSONI, Rebecca E. Gibbons, Casey Ellen Gray et al., 2015), with 585 citations. Next come "Position Statement on Active Outdoor Play" (496) and "What Is the Relationship between Outdoor Time and Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Physical Fitness in Children? A Systematic Review" (491).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 What is the Relationship between Risky Outdoor Play and Health in Children? A Systematic Review MARIANA J. BRUSSONI, Rebecca E. Gibbons, Casey Ellen Gray et al. · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ReviewOpen access 8 Jun 2015 585
2 Position Statement on Active Outdoor Play Mark Stephen Tremblay, Casey Ellen Gray, Shawna Babcock et al. · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Open access 8 Jun 2015 496
3 What Is the Relationship between Outdoor Time and Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Physical Fitness in Children? A Systematic Review Casey Ellen Gray, Rebecca E. Gibbons, Richard Larouche et al. · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ReviewOpen access 8 Jun 2015 491
4 Children's Risky Play from an Evolutionary Perspective: The Anti-Phobic Effects of Thrilling Experiences Ellen Beate Hansen Sandseter, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair · Evolutionary Psychology Open access Apr 2011 361
5 Categorising risky play—how can we identify risk‐taking in children's play? Ellen Beate Hansen Sandseter · European Early Childhood Education Research Journal Jun 2007 337
All 61 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Queen Maud University College?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Academic Achievement, Child Development, Self-Regulation, School Engagement, Student-Teacher Relationships, Education, Pedagogy and Qualitative Research.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Academic Achievement12▲ 63×4 topics
  2. Child Development12▲ 25×3 topics
  3. Education11▲ 5.6×12 topics
  4. Self-Regulation11▲ 54×5 topics
  5. School Engagement10▲ 187×1 topic
  6. Student-Teacher Relationships10▲ 187×1 topic
  7. Pedagogy8▲ 14×6 topics
  8. Qualitative Research8▲ 8.3×6 topics
  9. Ethical Considerations8▲ 20×3 topics
  10. Youth Engagement8▲ 31×4 topics
  11. Tacit Knowledge6▲ 123×2 topics
  12. Social Sciences6▲ 39×2 topics
  13. Youth Development6▲ 58×2 topics
  14. Student Voice6▲ 177×2 topics
  15. Learning6▲ 17×2 topics
  16. Physical Activity6▲ 10×6 topics
  17. Special Education5▲ 81×3 topics
  18. Citizenship Education5▲ 74×2 topics
  19. Discourse Analysis5▲ 20×3 topics
  20. Children's Participation5▲ 362×1 topic
  21. Mental Health5▲ 3.3×14 topics
  22. Research with Children5▲ 362×1 topic
  23. Methodology5▲ 91×2 topics
  24. Gender Studies5▲ 29×1 topic
  25. Quantitative Methods5▲ 330×1 topic
  26. Embodiment5▲ 22×5 topics
  27. Cognitive Development4▲ 28×3 topics
  28. Social Science4▲ 90×2 topics
  29. Identity4▲ 4.5×7 topics
  30. Adolescents3▲ 8.3×4 topics
  31. Ethical Guidelines3▲ 56×1 topic
  32. Interactional Expertise3▲ 276×1 topic
  33. Informal Learning3▲ 23×2 topics
  34. Activity Theory3▲ 204×1 topic
  35. Language Development3▲ 22×4 topics
  36. Religious Education3▲ 17×3 topics
  37. Workplace Learning3▲ 120×1 topic
  38. Inclusion3▲ 18×3 topics
  39. Multiculturalism3▲ 14×3 topics
  40. Citizenship3▲ 20×2 topics

Which research topics does Queen Maud University College publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Early Childhood Education and Development, Children's Rights and Participation, Social and Educational Sciences and Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research.

Early Childhood Educatio…10Early Childhood Education and Development: 10 fractional worksChildren's Rights and Participation: 5 fractional worksSocial and Educational Sciences: 5 fractional worksEducation, Healthcare and Sociology Research: 3 fractional worksInnovative Education and Learning Practices: 3 fractional worksReligious Education and …2Religious Education and Schools: 2 fractional worksChildren's Physical and Motor Development: 2 fractional worksChild Therapy and Development: 2 fractional worksAnimal and Plant Science Education: 2 fractional worksEducational and Psychological Assessments: 2 fractional works
EducationSociology and Political ScienceSocial PsychologyHuman Factors and Ergonomics2 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Early Childhood Education and Development Education 10 works
  2. 2 Children's Rights and Participation Sociology and Political Science 5 works
  3. 3 Social and Educational Sciences Education 5 works
  4. 4 Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research Social Psychology 3 works
  5. 5 Innovative Education and Learning Practices Human Factors and Ergonomics 3 works
  6. 6 Religious Education and Schools Education 2 works
  7. 7 Children's Physical and Motor Development Developmental and Educational Psychology 2 works
  8. 8 Child Therapy and Development Clinical Psychology 2 works
  9. 9 Animal and Plant Science Education Social Psychology 2 works
  10. 10 Educational and Psychological Assessments Developmental and Educational Psychology 2 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available71.4%not open28.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors12.7%domestic only87.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Queen Maud University College's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 7% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Queen Maud University College as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00029% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%Queen Maud University College0.00065% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Queen Maud University College over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Trondheim

All research institutions in Trondheim

Share Queen Maud University College's ranking

Queen Maud University College on Science Explorer

A card with Queen Maud University College's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Queen Maud University College. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.