Takenaka (Japan)
In research, Takenaka (Japan) stands highest in Physical Sciences (#12,075 of 12,888 worldwide) and Engineering (#6,284 of 6,636 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Civil and Structural Engineering — Civil and Structural Engineering is 22.6× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #24,606 of 28,054 · #27,534 all time
- Rank in Japan
- #825 of 1,070
- Research works
- 1.3k ▲ 16% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 11k 7.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 4.4% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 69% world 28%
What is Takenaka (Japan) known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #12,075 of 12,888 | 2.9% | 153 | #15197 | |
| EngineeringField | #6,284 of 6,636 | 1.5% | 104 | #6841 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Takenaka (Japan) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Takenaka (Japan) specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Civil and Structural Engineering takes 22.6× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Civil and Structural EngineeringSubfield · 58.2 works23×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Engineering, 3.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Engineering 3.2×
- Environmental Science 2.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.9×
- Energy 1.6×
- Neuroscience 1.3×
- Decision Sciences 1.1×
- Psychology 0.9×
- Materials Science 0.7×
- Social Sciences 0.7×
- Health Professions 0.6×
- Computer Science 0.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.6×
- Chemical Engineering 0.4×
- Medicine 0.4×
- Arts and Humanities 0.4×
- Nursing 0.3×
- Chemistry 0.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.2×
- Dentistry 0.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Mathematics 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Takenaka (Japan)?
Ranked on the composite score, 靖弘 濱田, Tadahiko Shiomi and 慶太 山崎 lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Takenaka (Japan).
- 1 靖弘 濱田 Japan · #160,060 worldwide 0 citations · 77 works
- 2 Tadahiko Shiomi Japan · #409,319 worldwide 75 citations · 18 works
- 3 慶太 山崎 Japan · #431,684 worldwide 0 citations · 28 works
- 4 Munenori Hatanaka Japan · #549,397 worldwide 87 citations · 17 works
- 5 健一 成田 Japan · #608,421 worldwide 0 citations · 83 works
- 6 宏一郎 小林 Japan · #786,003 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
- 7 Kazuo Ohtake Japan · #931,079 worldwide 16 citations · 19 works
- 8 M. Yamamoto Japan · #1,071,777 worldwide 37 citations · 50 works
- 9 Yoshio Suzuki Japan · #1,118,982 worldwide 64 citations · 38 works
- 10 Mariko Yoshida Japan · #1,350,884 worldwide 12 citations · 25 works
Which keywords describe research at Takenaka (Japan)?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Sustainability, Community Participation, Ecosystem Management, landscape conservation, Satoyama, Dynamic Interaction, Construction and Mechanical Properties.
- Energy Consumption
- Structural Optimization
- Urban Heat Island
- Community Resilience
- Earthquake
- Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites
- Tunnel
- Analysis
- Seismic Engineering
- Dynamic Analysis
- Stone Columns
- Footbridges
- Numerical Simulation
- Fiber Reinforcement
- Structural Engineering
- Soil Reinforcement
- Dynamic Interaction
- Satoyama
- Community Participation
- Mechanical Properties
- Sustainability
- Biodiversity
- Ecosystem Management
- landscape conservation
- Construction
- Finite Element Analysis
- Concrete-Filled Steel Tubes
- High-Strength Materials
- Numerical Analysis
- Geosynthetics
- Vibration Serviceability
- Ground Motion
- Durability Performance
- Liquefaction
- Concrete Strengthening
- Structural Analysis
- Seismic
- Finite Element Method
- Thermal Comfort
- Dynamic Behavior
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainability16▲ 3.1×19 topics
- Mechanical Properties10▲ 4.6×14 topics
- Biodiversity9▲ 5.3×5 topics
- Community Participation9▲ 11×2 topics
- Ecosystem Management8▲ 64×2 topics
- Satoyama8▲ 377×1 topic
- landscape conservation8▲ 377×1 topic
- Dynamic Interaction8▲ 56×2 topics
- Construction8▲ 27×2 topics
- Soil Reinforcement7▲ 52×2 topics
- Finite Element Analysis7▲ 14×5 topics
- Structural Engineering7▲ 67×2 topics
- Concrete-Filled Steel Tubes7▲ 73×1 topic
- Fiber Reinforcement7▲ 51×2 topics
- High-Strength Materials7▲ 73×1 topic
- Numerical Simulation7▲ 10×7 topics
- Numerical Analysis6▲ 59×2 topics
- Footbridges6▲ 75×1 topic
- Geosynthetics6▲ 57×1 topic
- Stone Columns6▲ 67×1 topic
- Vibration Serviceability6▲ 75×1 topic
- Dynamic Analysis6▲ 23×2 topics
- Ground Motion6▲ 78×1 topic
- Seismic Engineering6▲ 78×1 topic
- Durability Performance6▲ 29×2 topics
- Analysis6▲ 28×2 topics
- Liquefaction6▲ 28×2 topics
- Tunnel6▲ 28×2 topics
- Concrete Strengthening5▲ 38×1 topic
- Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites5▲ 38×1 topic
- Structural Analysis5▲ 26×4 topics
- Earthquake5▲ 36×1 topic
- Seismic5▲ 36×1 topic
- Community Resilience5▲ 12×3 topics
- Finite Element Method5▲ 22×3 topics
- Urban Heat Island5▲ 22×2 topics
- Thermal Comfort5▲ 16×2 topics
- Structural Optimization4▲ 62×2 topics
- Dynamic Behavior4▲ 18×2 topics
- Energy Consumption4▲ 8.9×3 topics
Which research topics does Takenaka (Japan) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Urban and spatial planning, Structural Load-Bearing Analysis, Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization and Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Urban and spatial planning Nature and Landscape Conservation 8 works
- 2 Structural Load-Bearing Analysis Civil and Structural Engineering 7 works
- 3 Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization Civil and Structural Engineering 6 works
- 4 Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis Civil and Structural Engineering 6 works
- 5 Seismic Performance and Analysis Civil and Structural Engineering 6 works
- 6 Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Building and Construction 5 works
- 7 Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures Civil and Structural Engineering 5 works
- 8 Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies Transportation 4 works
- 9 Structural Health Monitoring Techniques Civil and Structural Engineering 4 works
- 10 Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics Civil and Structural Engineering 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Takenaka (Japan)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 16% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Osaka
- The University of Osaka
- Osaka City University
- Kindai University
- National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
- Kansai Medical University
- Takeda (Japan)
- Osaka International Cancer Institute
- Osaka Institute of Technology
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.