Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Los Angeles · United States

Tarzana Treatment Centers

In research, Tarzana Treatment Centers stands highest in Health Sciences (#8,911 of 16,688 worldwide) and Medicine (#8,116 of 14,558 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, all time
#12,673
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#2,628
of 7,310
Research works
376
▲ 31% vs 2018-21
Citations
6.5k
17.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
6.6%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.99×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
17%
world 40%
International
7%
world 18%

What is Tarzana Treatment Centers known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Health SciencesDomain #8,911 of 16,688 7.9%176
MedicineField #8,116 of 14,558 8.2%162

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Tarzana Treatment Centers sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Tarzana Treatment Centers work in?

In 2022-now, 35% of research at Tarzana Treatment Centers is in Physical Sciences, 34% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (32%), Computer Science (27%), Social Sciences (7%). It does 1.4× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 14 fractional works · 34.7% of its workComputer Science: 11 fractional works · 27.2% of its workInformation Systems: 5 fractional works · 12.2% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 4 fractional works · 8.9% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 2 fractional works · 3.8% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 4.0% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSurfaces, Coatings and Films: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workAtmospheric Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 14 fractional works · 34.5% of its workMedicine: 12 fractional works · 31.5% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 3 fractional works · 6.4% of its workSurgery: 2 fractional works · 4.7% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHealth Informatics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHepatology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNursing: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workIssues, ethics and legal aspects: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workResearch and Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 9 fractional works · 24.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 7.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workDevelopment: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 3 fractional works · 6.4% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 2 fractional works · 4.8% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2 fractional works · 5.5% of its workManagement Information Systems: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workFinance: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLife Sciences: 3 fractional works · 6.8% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workSoil Science: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workClinical Biochemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiological Psychiatry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKTarzana TreatmentCenters39fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences7%Physical Sciences35%Health Sciences34%Social Sciences24%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 20 fields, with their numbers
    1. Computer Science1127.2%
    2. Engineering24.0%
    3. Environmental Science11.5%
    4. Materials Science00.8%
    5. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.7%
    6. Physics and Astronomy00.4%
    7. Energy00.1%
    1. Medicine1231.5%
    2. Nursing12.0%
    3. Health Professions01.0%
    1. Social Sciences37.0%
    2. Decision Sciences36.4%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting25.5%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance13.2%
    5. Psychology11.4%
    6. Arts and Humanities00.4%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences13.3%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology12.1%
    3. Neuroscience01.2%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.69× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.39× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.25× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.75× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 3.49× its world share, 11 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.41× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.08× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.27× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.29× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.24× its world share, 0 worksMaterials SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.39× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.64× its world share, 12 worksMedicineNursing: 4.03× its world share, 1 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.70× its world share, 2 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 6.66× its world share, 2 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.51× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.47× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.55× its world share, 3 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 6.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 20 fields, with their numbers
  1. Decision Sciences6.66×2 works
  2. Nursing4.03×1 works
  3. Computer Science3.49×11 works
  4. Business, Management and Accounting1.70×2 works
  5. Medicine1.64×12 works
  6. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.51×1 works
  7. Neuroscience0.75×0 works
  8. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.69×1 works
  9. Social Sciences0.55×3 works
  10. Psychology0.47×1 works
  11. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.41×0 works
  12. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.39×1 works
  13. Health Professions0.39×0 works
  14. Environmental Science0.29×1 works
  15. Engineering0.27×2 works
  16. Immunology and Microbiology0.25×0 works
  17. Materials Science0.24×0 works
  18. Physics and Astronomy0.19×0 works
  19. Arts and Humanities0.15×0 works
  20. Energy0.08×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Tarzana Treatment Centers?

Ranked on the quality score, Yehuda Handelsman, Scott M. Eisenkop and Dana Chidekel lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Tarzana Treatment Centers.

  1. 1 Yehuda Handelsman United States · #58,792 worldwide 23k citations · 236 works
  2. 2 Scott M. Eisenkop United States · #437,123 worldwide 5.4k citations · 52 works
  3. 3 Dana Chidekel United States · #1,866,801 worldwide 695 citations · 30 works
  4. 4 R.C. Hansen United States · #1,950,571 worldwide 3.6k citations · 199 works
  5. 5 Syed Mohamed Thameem Nizamudeen United States · #2,333,220 worldwide 51 citations · 15 works
  6. 6 Gaurav S. Deshmukh United States · #3,341,760 worldwide 54 citations · 23 works
  7. 7 Edward M. Young United States · #3,676,008 worldwide 150 citations · 73 works
  8. 8 Peter B. Samuels United States · #3,745,015 worldwide 322 citations · 25 works
  9. 9 JOHN HOCHMAN United States · #4,528,245 worldwide 100 citations · 19 works
  10. 10 Melvyn R. Werbach United States · #4,685,337 worldwide 192 citations · 27 works
All ranked researchers at Tarzana Treatment Centers

What are the most cited papers from Tarzana Treatment Centers?

The most cited paper from Tarzana Treatment Centers is "Differentiation of Diabetes by Pathophysiology, Natural History, and Prognosis" (Jay S. Skyler, George L. Bakris, Ezio E. Bonifacio et al., 2016), with 835 citations. Next come "Comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X:BOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial" (716) and "Cardiovascular safety and efficacy of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab in patients with and without diabetes and the effect of evolocumab on glycaemia and risk of new-onset diabetes: a prespecified analysis of the FOURIER randomised controlled trial" (604).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Differentiation of Diabetes by Pathophysiology, Natural History, and Prognosis Jay S. Skyler, George L. Bakris, Ezio E. Bonifacio et al. · Diabetes Open access 15 Dec 2016 835
2 Comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X:BOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial Joshua D. Lee et al. · The Lancet Open access 15 Nov 2017 716
3 Cardiovascular safety and efficacy of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab in patients with and without diabetes and the effect of evolocumab on glycaemia and risk of new-onset diabetes: a prespecified analysis of the FOURIER randomised controlled trial Marc Steven Sabatine, Lawrence A. Leiter, Stephen D. Wiviott et al. · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology Open access 15 Sep 2017 604
4 Complete Cytoreductive Surgery Is Feasible and Maximizes Survival in Patients with Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Prospective Study Scott M. Eisenkop, Richard L. Friedman, He-Jing Wang · Gynecologic Oncology May 1998 519
5 Relative influences of tumor volume before surgery and the cytoreductive outcome on survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective study Scott M. Eisenkop, Nick M. Spirtos, Richard L. Friedman et al. · Gynecologic Oncology 30 Jun 2003 416
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Tarzana Treatment Centers?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Big Data, Distributed Systems, Cloud Computing, Resource Management, Data Centers, MapReduce, Workflow Management and Metabolic Syndrome.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 39 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 39 words, with their numbers
  1. Big Data5▲ 14×6 topics
  2. Distributed Systems4▲ 52×3 topics
  3. Cloud Computing3▲ 27×2 topics
  4. Resource Management3▲ 45×2 topics
  5. Data Centers3▲ 114×1 topic
  6. MapReduce3▲ 114×1 topic
  7. Artificial Intelligence2▲ 4.3×6 topics
  8. Workflow Management2▲ 76×2 topics
  9. Metabolic Syndrome2▲ 6.4×6 topics
  10. Healthcare2▲ 3.9×6 topics
  11. Machine Learning2▲ 1.39×7 topics
  12. Reproducibility2▲ 118×1 topic
  13. Scientific Workflows2▲ 118×1 topic
  14. Supply Chain Management2▲ 5.0×4 topics
  15. Diabetes2▲ 8.7×4 topics
  16. Oxidative Stress2▲ 2.4×6 topics
  17. Inflammation2▲ 1.74×8 topics
  18. Sustainability2▲ 1.57×4 topics
  19. Cardiovascular Disease1▲ 3.1×7 topics
  20. Epidemiology1◆ 0.87×12 topics
  21. Heart Failure1▲ 7.8×5 topics
  22. Risk Management1▲ 7.5×3 topics
  23. Digital Transformation1▲ 6.2×3 topics
  24. Internet of Things1▲ 3.9×4 topics
  25. Smart Cities1▲ 13×4 topics
  26. Complications1▲ 6.2×3 topics
  27. Glycemic Control1▲ 19×2 topics
  28. Insulin Therapy1▲ 24×2 topics
  29. Quality of Life1▲ 2.1×5 topics
  30. Security1▲ 4.4×3 topics
  31. Poverty1▲ 28×2 topics
  32. Sustainable Development1▲ 1.84×4 topics
  33. Agriculture1▲ 6.8×2 topics
  34. Analytics1▲ 29×1 topic
  35. Business Intelligence1▲ 29×1 topic
  36. Food Security1▲ 4.8×2 topics
  37. Insurance1▲ 34×1 topic
  38. Neural Networks1▲ 1.64×4 topics
  39. Vulnerability1▲ 11×1 topic

Which research topics does Tarzana Treatment Centers publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Big Data and Business Intelligence and Agricultural risk and resilience.

  1. 1 Cloud Computing and Resource Management Information Systems 3 works
  2. 2 Scientific Computing and Data Management Information Systems and Management 2 works
  3. 3 Big Data and Business Intelligence Management Information Systems 1 works
  4. 4 Agricultural risk and resilience Soil Science 1 works
  5. 5 Natural Language Processing Techniques Artificial Intelligence 1 works
  6. 6 Diabetes Treatment and Management Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 1 works
  7. 7 Diet and metabolism studies Physiology 1 works
  8. 8 Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies Obstetrics and Gynecology 1 works
  9. 9 Breastfeeding Practices and Influences Epidemiology 1 works
  10. 10 Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation Artificial Intelligence 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available17.0%not open83.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors7.1%domestic only92.9%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Tarzana Treatment Centers's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 31% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Tarzana Treatment Centers as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00029% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%0.0030%Tarzana Treatment Centers0.00019% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Tarzana Treatment Centers over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Los Angeles

All research institutions in Los Angeles

Share Tarzana Treatment Centers's ranking

Tarzana Treatment Centers on Science Explorer

A card with Tarzana Treatment Centers's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Tarzana Treatment Centers. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.