Universidade Federal do Amapá
In research, Universidade Federal do Amapá stands highest in Social Sciences (#2,861 of 9,585 worldwide), Social Sciences (#1,963 of 5,988 worldwide) and Life Sciences (#2,700 of 6,403 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Urban Studies, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Health (Urban Studies is 11.1× its share of world research).
- World rank, 2022-now
- #3,181 of 22,385 · #4,097 all time
- Rank in Brazil
- #114 of 684
- Research works
- 3.5k ▼ 4% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 14k 3.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 6.2% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.90× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 82% world 40%
- International
- 10% world 18%
What is Universidade Federal do Amapá known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #2,861 of 9,585 | 7.9% | 520 | #2845 | |
| Social SciencesField | #1,963 of 5,988 | 7.9% | 377 | #2092 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #2,700 of 6,403 | 4.9% | 144 | #4158 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #4,696 of 9,902 | 4.0% | 247 | #6763 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #5,837 of 10,670 | 5.3% | 257 | #6181 | |
| MedicineField | #4,790 of 8,541 | 2.5% | 155 | #7762 | |
| Agricultural and Biological SciencesField | #1,844 of 3,157 | 4.8% | 92 | #2397 | |
| Environmental ScienceField | #2,303 of 3,334 | 5.8% | 160 | #2554 | |
| Management, Monitoring, Policy and LawSubfield | #236 of 341 | 8.3% | 62 | #497 | |
| Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield | #1,836 of 2,526 | 8.1% | 100 | #2451 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Universidade Federal do Amapá sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022-now. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#2,845 #2,861
- Social Sciences#2,092 #1,963
- Life Sciences#4,158 #2,700
- Health Sciences#6,763 #4,696
- Physical Sciences#6,181 #5,837
- Medicine#7,762 #4,790
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences#2,397 #1,844
- Environmental Science#2,554 #2,303
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law#497 #236
- Sociology and Political Science#2,451 #1,836
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Which fields of science does Universidade Federal do Amapá work in?
In 2022-now, 44% of research at Universidade Federal do Amapá is in Social Sciences, 22% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (33%), Environmental Science (13%), Medicine (13%). It does 1.8× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 26 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences56344.4%
- Social Sciences41232.5%
- Arts and Humanities796.3%
- Psychology282.2%
- Decision Sciences241.9%
- Business, Management and Accounting131.0%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance70.5%
- Physical Sciences27721.9%
- Environmental Science17113.5%
- Computer Science372.9%
- Engineering262.1%
- Materials Science110.9%
- Chemistry80.6%
- Physics and Astronomy80.6%
- Mathematics60.5%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences60.5%
- Energy40.3%
- Chemical Engineering00.0%
- Health Sciences27121.4%
- Medicine17013.4%
- Health Professions886.9%
- Nursing100.8%
- Veterinary20.2%
- Dentistry20.1%
- Life Sciences15612.3%
What does Universidade Federal do Amapá specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Urban Studies takes 11.1× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Urban StudiesSubfield · 38.9 works11×
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and LawSubfield · 65.8 works8.9×
- HealthSubfield · 25.1 works6.7×
- Information Systems and ManagementSubfield · 21.2 works5.8×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 2.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 26 fields, with their numbers
- Environmental Science2.71×170 works
- Health Professions2.62×88 works
- Social Sciences2.57×412 works
- Arts and Humanities2.17×80 works
- Decision Sciences1.95×24 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.60×97 works
- Nursing1.58×10 works
- Veterinary1.26×2 works
- Immunology and Microbiology1.17×15 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics1.06×5 works
- Psychology0.72×28 works
- Medicine0.70×170 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.53×36 works
- Mathematics0.41×6 works
- Chemistry0.39×8 works
- Computer Science0.38×37 works
- Energy0.34×4 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.32×13 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.30×6 works
- Dentistry0.29×2 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.27×8 works
- Materials Science0.25×11 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.25×7 works
- Neuroscience0.17×4 works
- Engineering0.14×26 works
- Chemical Engineering0.06×0 works
- Environmental Science 2.7×
- Health Professions 2.6×
- Social Sciences 2.6×
- Arts and Humanities 2.2×
- Decision Sciences 1.9×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.6×
- Nursing 1.6×
- Veterinary 1.3×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.2×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 1.1×
- Psychology 0.7×
- Medicine 0.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.4×
- Chemistry 0.4×
- Computer Science 0.4×
- Energy 0.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.3×
- Dentistry 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.3×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.2×
- Neuroscience 0.2×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Universidade Federal do Amapá?
Ranked on the quality score, José Júlio de Toledo, Renato Richard Hilário and Karen Mustin lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Universidade Federal do Amapá.
- 1
José Júlio de Toledo
Brazil · #371,332 worldwide 1.9k citations · 112 works
- 2
Renato Richard Hilário
Brazil · #472,518 worldwide 1.9k citations · 102 works
- 3
Karen Mustin
Brazil · #1,612,384 worldwide 1.7k citations · 65 works
- 4
Raquel Silva Araújo
Brazil · #1,786,439 worldwide 951 citations · 34 works
- 5
Daímio Chaves Brito
Brazil · #1,825,231 worldwide 1.1k citations · 26 works
- 6
Antônia Costa Andrade
Brazil · #1,866,541 worldwide 686 citations · 34 works
- 7
Raí C. Silva
Brazil · #2,197,215 worldwide 509 citations · 25 works
- 8
William Douglas de Carvalho
Brazil · #2,250,852 worldwide 1.7k citations · 293 works
- 9
Elenilze F. B. Ferreira
Brazil · #2,278,014 worldwide 453 citations · 17 works
- 10
Vanessa da Silva Oliveira
Brazil · #2,587,458 worldwide 432 citations · 27 works
Which keywords describe research at Universidade Federal do Amapá?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Public Policy, Teacher Training, Sustainability, Globalization, Biodiversity, Public Health, Social Movements and Social Inequality.
- Social Determinants
- Spatial Planning
- Rural Development
- Educational Reform
- Critical Pedagogy
- Pedagogical Practices
- Inclusive Education
- Eco-friendly Practices
- Health
- Colonialism
- Waste Management
- Healthcare Access
- Agroecology
- Quality of Life
- Educational Technology
- Social Inequality
- Sustainable Development
- Biodiversity
- Globalization
- Sustainability
- Public Policy
- Teacher Training
- Public Health
- Qualitative Research
- Social Movements
- Education
- Curriculum Development
- Cultural Identity
- Online Learning
- Healthcare
- Environmental Education
- Water Resources
- Social Participation
- Brazil
- Educational Policies
- Anthropology
- Distance Learning
- Environmental Justice
- Territoriality
- Segregation
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Public Policy121▲ 20×15 topics
- Sustainability104▲ 3.3×38 topics
- Teacher Training96▲ 12×12 topics
- Globalization95▲ 3.8×40 topics
- Public Health80▲ 4.3×38 topics
- Biodiversity70▲ 7.2×21 topics
- Qualitative Research63▲ 5.8×10 topics
- Sustainable Development62▲ 3.1×18 topics
- Social Movements60▲ 16×10 topics
- Social Inequality58▲ 17×8 topics
- Education56▲ 2.6×30 topics
- Educational Technology56▲ 3.7×9 topics
- Curriculum Development51▲ 6.0×2 topics
- Quality of Life49▲ 2.7×36 topics
- Cultural Identity48▲ 7.7×13 topics
- Agroecology48▲ 27×5 topics
- Online Learning45▲ 4.3×4 topics
- Healthcare Access44▲ 13×6 topics
- Healthcare43▲ 3.0×15 topics
- Waste Management40▲ 7.9×7 topics
- Environmental Education38▲ 20×4 topics
- Colonialism37▲ 6.1×12 topics
- Water Resources37▲ 12×5 topics
- Health36▲ 7.1×9 topics
- Social Participation36▲ 48×2 topics
- Eco-friendly Practices36▲ 49×1 topic
- Brazil35▲ 30×5 topics
- Inclusive Education34▲ 7.4×6 topics
- Educational Policies32▲ 23×3 topics
- Pedagogical Practices32▲ 28×2 topics
- Anthropology31▲ 26×5 topics
- Critical Pedagogy31▲ 29×1 topic
- Distance Learning31▲ 7.0×1 topic
- Educational Reform31▲ 20×2 topics
- Environmental Justice28▲ 16×3 topics
- Rural Development28▲ 6.4×5 topics
- Territoriality27▲ 45×2 topics
- Spatial Planning26▲ 14×3 topics
- Segregation26▲ 26×1 topic
- Social Determinants25▲ 9.7×6 topics
Which research topics does Universidade Federal do Amapá publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Environmental Sustainability and Education, Education Pedagogy and Practices, Urban Development and Societal Issues and Rural and Ethnic Education.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Environmental Sustainability and Education Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 36 works
- 2 Education Pedagogy and Practices Education 31 works
- 3 Urban Development and Societal Issues Urban Studies 26 works
- 4 Rural and Ethnic Education Education 24 works
- 5 Rural Development and Agriculture Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 22 works
- 6 Academic Research in Diverse Fields Education 21 works
- 7 Business and Management Studies Information Systems and Management 21 works
- 8 Science and Education Research Education 20 works
- 9 Education and Digital Technologies Sociology and Political Science 20 works
- 10 Migration, Racism, and Human Rights Health 18 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Universidade Federal do Amapá's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 4% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Universidade Federal do Amapá as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0057% in 2024.
Fractional works of Universidade Federal do Amapá over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 8.0% in 2020.
Other research institutions in Macapá
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Universidade Federal do Amapá. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
