Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Institution · Bielefeld · Germany

v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel

Research works
103
▼ 38% vs 2018-21
Citations
2.8k
27.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
10.3%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
10%
world 40%
International
13%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel work in?

In all years, 56% of research at v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel is in Health Sciences, 24% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (45%), Psychology (14%), Health Professions (11%). It does 2.2× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 57 fractional works · 55.6% of its workMedicine: 46 fractional works · 44.5% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 22 fractional works · 21.4% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 9 fractional works · 9.0% of its workEpidemiology: 2 fractional works · 1.8% of its workSurgery: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workAnatomy: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workImmunology and Allergy: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Professions: 11 fractional works · 11.1% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 10 fractional works · 9.3% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 25 fractional works · 24.0% of its workPsychology: 14 fractional works · 13.6% of its workClinical Psychology: 9 fractional works · 8.3% of its workSocial Psychology: 3 fractional works · 3.1% of its workApplied Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeneral Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 4 fractional works · 4.2% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 1.9% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workCultural Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 4 fractional works · 3.7% of its workPhilosophy: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workHistory: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workReligious studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMusic: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workLife Sciences: 17 fractional works · 16.5% of its workNeuroscience: 6 fractional works · 6.0% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 5 fractional works · 4.9% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 6 fractional works · 5.7% of its workClinical Biochemistry: 2 fractional works · 1.9% of its workGenetics: 2 fractional works · 1.7% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workCell Biology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 4 fractional works · 4.1% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 4 fractional works · 4.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 4 fractional works · 3.9% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDiscrete Mathematics and Combinatorics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCondensed Matter Physics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPaleontology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKv. BodelschwingFoundation Bethel103fractional works, all years
Life Sciences16%Physical Sciences4%Health Sciences56%Social Sciences24%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 23 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine4644.5%
    2. Health Professions1111.1%
    3. Nursing00.1%
    1. Psychology1413.6%
    2. Social Sciences44.2%
    3. Arts and Humanities43.7%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting11.4%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance10.7%
    6. Decision Sciences00.5%
    1. Neuroscience66.0%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology65.7%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences44.1%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.4%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.2%
    1. Materials Science11.3%
    2. Engineering00.5%
    3. Computer Science00.5%
    4. Environmental Science00.4%
    5. Chemistry00.3%
    6. Mathematics00.3%
    7. Physics and Astronomy00.3%
    8. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.3%
    9. Energy00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.52× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.37× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.47× its world share, 0 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 3.90× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Computer Science: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEnvironmental Science: 0.08× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 7.43× its world share, 2 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.35× its world share, 3 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 5.24× its world share, 2 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.14× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Psychology: 6.42× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.59× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 7.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 12 fields, with their numbers
  1. Health Professions7.43×2 works
  2. Psychology6.42×2 works
  3. Arts and Humanities5.24×2 works
  4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics3.90×0 works
  5. Neuroscience1.47×0 works
  6. Immunology and Microbiology1.37×0 works
  7. Medicine1.35×3 works
  8. Business, Management and Accounting1.14×0 works
  9. Social Sciences0.59×1 works
  10. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.52×0 works
  11. Environmental Science0.08×0 works
  12. Computer Science0.04×0 works

Who are the top researchers at v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel?

Ranked on the quality score, Jürgen Lempert-Horstkotte, Bernd Huber and Gerhard Schorsch lead among researchers whose main affiliation is v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel.

  1. 1 Jürgen Lempert-Horstkotte Germany · #3,001,033 worldwide 2 citations · 16 works
  2. 2 Bernd Huber Germany · #3,660,773 worldwide 585 citations · 34 works
  3. 3 Gerhard Schorsch Germany · #3,990,231 worldwide 141 citations · 20 works
  4. 4 Michael Endermann Germany · #4,655,484 worldwide 207 citations · 17 works
  5. 5 Rudolf Dreyer Germany · #5,299,544 worldwide 133 citations · 39 works
All ranked researchers at v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel

What are the most cited papers from v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel?

The most cited paper from v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel is "A Factorial Trial of Six Interventions for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting" (Christian C. Apfel, Kari T. Korttila, Mona Abdalla et al., 2004), with 1,568 citations. Next come "Die Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit" (1,260) and "Semiological Seizure Classification*" (625).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 A Factorial Trial of Six Interventions for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Christian C. Apfel, Kari T. Korttila, Mona Abdalla et al. · New England Journal of Medicine Open access 9 Jun 2004 1,568
2 Die Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit Michael Seidel · Der Nervenarzt 29 Dec 2004 1,260
3 Semiological Seizure Classification* Hans Otto Lüders et al. · Epilepsia Open access Sep 1998 625
4 Neuropathological Findings in Primary Generalized Epilepsy: A Study of Eight Cases H.‐J. Meencke, Diéter Janz · Epilepsia Feb 1984 434
5 The first seizure and its management in adults and children Bernd Pohlmann‐Eden, Ettore Beghi, Carol Camfield et al. · BMJ Open access 9 Feb 2006 140
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Antiepileptic Drugs, Inflammation, Neurobiology, Genetics, Epilepsy, Seizures, Drug Resistance and Classification.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Antiepileptic Drugs23▲ 224×2 topics
  2. Inflammation19▲ 7.9×9 topics
  3. Genetics18▲ 23×5 topics
  4. Neurobiology18▲ 53×3 topics
  5. Epilepsy18▲ 137×3 topics
  6. Seizures17▲ 225×2 topics
  7. Drug Resistance17▲ 53×3 topics
  8. Classification17▲ 46×1 topic
  9. Status Epilepticus17▲ 294×1 topic
  10. Oxidative Stress7▲ 3.8×5 topics
  11. Cognitive Function7▲ 34×3 topics
  12. Bone Health6▲ 57×2 topics
  13. Prenatal Exposure6▲ 137×1 topic
  14. Teratogenicity6▲ 92×1 topic
  15. Neurological Disorders5▲ 7.8×5 topics
  16. Dendritic Spines5▲ 28×2 topics
  17. Crisis Resolution5▲ 195×1 topic
  18. Home Treatment5▲ 195×1 topic
  19. Public Health5▲ 3.4×5 topics
  20. Synaptic Plasticity4▲ 12×2 topics
  21. Emotion Regulation4▲ 11×3 topics
  22. GABAergic4▲ 27×1 topic
  23. Neurotransmission4▲ 27×1 topic
  24. Depression3▲ 3.7×7 topics
  25. Chronic Diseases3▲ 9.8×2 topics
  26. Elderly Care3▲ 21×2 topics
  27. Epidemiological Study3▲ 35×2 topics
  28. Germany3▲ 89×1 topic
  29. Health Surveys3▲ 89×1 topic
  30. Health-related Quality of Life3▲ 12×2 topics
  31. DNA Barcoding2▲ 15×3 topics
  32. Phylogeny2▲ 13×3 topics
  33. Prevalence2▲ 5.9×6 topics
  34. Anxiety2▲ 6.2×3 topics
  35. Social Cognition2▲ 12×3 topics
  36. Interoception2▲ 63×1 topic
  37. Morphology2▲ 11×2 topics
  38. Somatic Symptoms2▲ 63×1 topic
  39. Biochemical Genetics2▲ 24×1 topic
  40. Metabolic Disorders2▲ 10×1 topic

Which research topics does v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Psychiatric care and mental health services, Innovation, Technology, and Society, Social Policies and Healthcare Reform and Schizophrenia research and treatment.

  1. 1 Psychiatric care and mental health services Clinical Psychology 1 works
  2. 2 Innovation, Technology, and Society Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  3. 3 Social Policies and Healthcare Reform General Health Professions 0 works
  4. 4 Schizophrenia research and treatment Psychiatry and Mental health 0 works
  5. 5 Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 0 works
  6. 6 Epilepsy research and treatment Psychiatry and Mental health 0 works
  7. 7 Behavioral Health and Interventions Applied Psychology 0 works
  8. 8 Tracheal and airway disorders Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
  9. 9 Digital Innovation in Industries Management of Technology and Innovation 0 works
  10. 10 Historical and Religious Studies of Rome History 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available10.2%not open89.8%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors13.3%domestic only86.7%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 38% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000033% in 2024.

still counting0.00025%0.00050%0.00075%v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel0.000031% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Bielefeld

All research institutions in Bielefeld

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about v. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.