Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Advanced Database Systems and Queries

Advanced Database Systems and Queries is a research topic within Computer Networks and Communications. Science Explorer counts 45k research works in it since 1952. 19.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on data stream management systems and techniques, including continuous queries, XML and relational database systems, query optimization, stream processing, approximate query processing, column-oriented database systems, complex event processing, and main memory databases.

  • Data Stream Management
  • Continuous Queries
  • XML
  • Relational Database Systems
  • Query Optimization
  • Stream Processing
  • Approximate Query Processing
  • Column-oriented Database Systems
  • Complex Event Processing
  • Main Memory Databases
Research works
45k
fractional, since 1952
In the world top 10%
8.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
19.9%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
-34%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Advanced Database Systems and Queries research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (635 and 420 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 635 works
  2. 2 China 420 works
  3. 3 Germany 269 works
  4. 4 India 186 works
  5. 5 France 145 works
  6. 6 United Kingdom 119 works
  7. 7 Italy 108 works
  8. 8 Brazil 69 works
  9. 9 Canada 69 works
  10. 10 Japan 62 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 30.5%China: 20.2%Germany: 12.9%India: 8.9%6 others listed: 27.5%31%largest
United States635 · 30.5%China420 · 20.2%Germany269 · 12.9%India186 · 8.9%6 others listed572 · 27.5%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Advanced Database Systems and Queries research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Tsinghua University publishes the most Advanced Database Systems and Queries research, followed by Technical University of Munich and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Tsinghua University China 23 works
  2. 2 Technical University of Munich Germany 16 works
  3. 3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique France 15 works
  4. 4 RWTH Aachen University Germany 14 works
  5. 5 Peking University China 14 works
  6. 6 University of Waterloo Canada 14 works
  7. 7 Harbin Institute of Technology China 12 works
  8. 8 George Mason University United States 12 works
  9. 9 Film Independent United States 11 works
  10. 10 Carnegie Mellon University United States 11 works

Who are the leading researchers in Advanced Database Systems and Queries?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Advanced Database Systems and Queries include Li Fei-Fei, Rajkumar Buyya and Philip S. Yu.

  1. 1 Li Fei-Fei 17k citations
  2. 2 Rajkumar Buyya 7.8k citations
  3. 3 Philip S. Yu 6.6k citations
  4. 4 Hans‐Peter Kriegel 5.7k citations
  5. 5 Randy H. Katz 5.7k citations
  6. 6 Wil M. P. van der Aalst 5.5k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Advanced Database Systems and Queries research done?

The largest centres of Advanced Database Systems and Queries research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Paris (France), Shanghai (China) and New York (United States).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 113 works
  2. 2 Paris France 40 works
  3. 3 Shanghai China 37 works
  4. 4 New York United States 29 works
  5. 5 Nanjing China 27 works
  6. 6 Moscow Russia 25 works
  7. 7 London United Kingdom 25 works
  8. 8 Munich Germany 25 works
  9. 9 Hong Kong China 24 works
  10. 10 Shenzhen China 23 works
See Advanced Database Systems and Queries on the map

Where is the best place to study Advanced Database Systems and Queries?

Among universities, judged by research, Carnegie Mellon University, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano and RWTH Aachen University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 23.99%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Carnegie Mellon University: 11, 17.6%Free University of Bozen-Bolzano: 9, 25.9%RWTH Aachen University: 14, 27.8%Tsinghua University: 23, 31.6%Technische Universität Berlin: 10, 18.1%Technical University of Munich: 16, 19.6%Renmin University of China: 10, 28.4%TU Wien: 11, 13.7%Nanyang Technological University: 9, 35.0%East China Normal University: 10, 22.2%Tsinghua UniversityRWTH Aachen UniversityFree University of B…Carnegie Mellon Univ…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Carnegie Mellon University United States 62.617.6%9.3×11 +143.8%
2Free University of Bozen-Bolzano Italy 57.725.9%31.2×9 -16.9%
3RWTH Aachen University Germany 57.627.8%6.5×14 +23.0%
4Tsinghua University China 57.331.6%4.0×23 -51.3%
5Technische Universität Berlin Germany 57.118.1%10.5×10 +42.6%
6Technical University of Munich Germany 55.919.6%6.9×16 +11.2%
7Renmin University of China China 55.428.4%10.0×10 -67.2%
8TU Wien Austria 50.413.7%11.8×11 -19.3%
9Nanyang Technological University Singapore 47.535.0%3.7×9 -57.3%
10East China Normal University China 46.922.2%7.2×10 -6.2%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Advanced Database Systems and Queries research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 34% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2002.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.