Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy is a research topic within Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Science Explorer counts 34k research works in it since 1950. 17.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the impact of assisted reproductive technology, particularly in vitro fertilization, on perinatal outcomes, including the risk of birth defects, imprinting disorders, and neurological sequelae. It also delves into the management of twin pregnancies, the use of fetoscopic laser coagulation, and the benefits of selective embryo transfer.
- Assisted Reproductive Technology
- In Vitro Fertilization
- Twin Pregnancy
- Birth Defects
- Perinatal Outcome
- Monozygotic Twins
- Imprinting Disorders
- Fetoscopic Laser Coagulation
- Selective Embryo Transfer
- Neurodevelopmental Outcome
- Research works
- 34k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 6k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 17.5% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +18% the tick is no change
This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.
Which countries lead Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.1k and 538 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 1.1k works
- 2 China 538 works
- 3 India 336 works
- 4 United Kingdom 230 works
- 5 Italy 168 works
- 6 Türkiye 167 works
- 7 Germany 136 works
- 8 Spain 135 works
- 9 Australia 124 works
- 10 Canada 123 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Monash University publishes the most Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy research, followed by Tel Aviv University and Baylor College of Medicine.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Monash UniversityAustralia 19 works
- 2 Tel Aviv UniversityIsrael 17 works
- 3 Baylor College of MedicineUnited States 17 works
- 4 Harvard UniversityUnited States 17 works
- 5 Northwestern UniversityUnited States 17 works
- 6 Sağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiTürkiye 16 works
- 7 McGill UniversityCanada 15 works
- 8 Peking UniversityChina 15 works
- 9 Yale UniversityUnited States 14 works
- 10 Valencian Infertility InstituteSpain 14 works
Who are the leading researchers in Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy include Patrick M. Bossuyt, Nicholas G. Martin and Jaakko Kaprio.
- 1 Patrick M. Bossuyt Netherlands 14k citations
- 2 Nicholas G. Martin Australia 3.5k citations
- 3 Jaakko Kaprio Finland 3.4k citations
- 4 Dorret I. Boomsma Netherlands 3.2k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy research done?
The largest centres of Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), New York (United States), Beijing (China) and Istanbul (Türkiye). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Tel Aviv.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- Tel AvivIL · 24.9 works6.7×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy?
Among universities, judged by research, Monash University, Baylor College of Medicine and Tel Aviv University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monash UniversityAustralia | 64.3 | 23.3% | 4.8× | 19 | +98.3% |
| 2 | Baylor College of MedicineUnited States | 60.4 | 13.3% | 9.2× | 17 | +76.4% |
| 3 | Tel Aviv UniversityIsrael | 59.3 | 16.7% | 6.7× | 17 | +79.6% |
| 4 | Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and ResearchIndia | 55.2 | 16.7% | 11.9× | 13 | — |
| 5 | Harvard UniversityUnited States | 55.0 | 25.8% | 2.9× | 17 | +50.0% |
| 6 | Northwestern UniversityUnited States | 52.1 | 17.9% | 5.3× | 17 | +45.6% |
| 7 | University College LondonUnited Kingdom | 44.7 | 24.5% | 2.1× | 14 | -4.8% |
| 8 | Sağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiTürkiye | 43.8 | 2.7% | 6.1× | 16 | — |
| 9 | Yale UniversityUnited States | 43.7 | 24.9% | 3.1× | 14 | -15.7% |
| 10 | Nanjing Medical UniversityChina | 42.7 | 28.7% | 4.4× | 10 | +24.8% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 18% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2021. The fastest-growing topics are Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.