Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Comparative International Legal Studies

Comparative International Legal Studies is a research topic within Political Science and International Relations. Science Explorer counts 14k research works in it since 1950. 5.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers a wide range of legal and environmental topics, including contractual law, civil liability, consumer rights, corporate social responsibility, and environmental regulation. The focus is on the legal and ethical aspects of sustainable development, responsibility of the state, and the judicial system in Latin America.

  • Responsibility
  • Contractual Law
  • Environmental Regulation
  • Consumer Rights
  • Judicial System
  • Sustainable Development
  • Civil Liability
  • Legal Ethics
  • Corporate Social Responsibility
  • International Law
Research works
14k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
792
per year above
Top-10% rate
5.5%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+2%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Comparative International Legal Studies research?

By volume, Spain and Colombia publish the most (713 and 280 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Spain 713 works
  2. 2 Colombia 280 works
  3. 3 Ecuador 268 works
  4. 4 Chile 214 works
  5. 5 Peru 209 works
  6. 6 Mexico 172 works
  7. 7 Brazil 167 works
  8. 8 Argentina 143 works
  9. 9 France 69 works
  10. 10 ?? 54 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Spain: 31.1%Colombia: 12.2%Ecuador: 11.7%Chile: 9.4%6 others listed: 35.6%31%largest
Spain713 · 31.1%Colombia280 · 12.2%Ecuador268 · 11.7%Chile214 · 9.4%6 others listed815 · 35.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Comparative International Legal Studies research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes publishes the most Comparative International Legal Studies research, followed by Universitat de Barcelona and Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Who are the leading researchers in Comparative International Legal Studies?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Comparative International Legal Studies include Niklas Luhmann and Juan Ramón De La Fuente.

  1. 1 Niklas Luhmann Germany 2.3k citations
  2. 2 Juan Ramón De La Fuente Mexico 1.5k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Comparative International Legal Studies research done?

The largest centres of Comparative International Legal Studies research in 2022–2025 are Madrid (Spain), Bogotá (Colombia), Lima (Peru) and Santiago (Chile). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Durán, Ambato and La Paz.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Madrid Spain 211 works
  2. 2 Bogotá Colombia 163 works
  3. 3 Lima Peru 126 works
  4. 4 Santiago Chile 113 works
  5. 5 Ambato Ecuador 93 works
  6. 6 Barcelona Spain 66 works
  7. 7 Buenos Aires Argentina 59 works
  8. 8 Mexico City Mexico 51 works
  9. 9 Quito Ecuador 42 works
  10. 10 Medellín Colombia 39 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. Durán33.3 works164×
  2. AmbatoEC · 92.5 works86×
  3. La PazBO · 21.2 works47×
  4. BogotáCO · 163.2 works36×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Comparative International Legal Studies than the world average.

See Comparative International Legal Studies on the map

Where is the best place to study Comparative International Legal Studies?

Among universities, judged by research, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, Universidad Libre de Colombia and Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 16.1%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo: 12, 35.7%Universidad Libre de Colombia: 25, 10.6%Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador: 33, 19.0%Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes: 50, 13.7%Universidad Rey Juan Carlos: 20, 14.2%University of Chile: 33, 9.1%Universidad Autónoma de Madrid: 31, 12.0%Universidad de Salamanca: 15, 11.0%Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador: 12, 17.3%Universidad Católica de Cuenca: 24, 18.4%Universidad Nacional…Universidad Bolivari…Universidad Regional…Universidad Libre de…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Universidad Nacional de ChimborazoEcuador 68.435.7%60.1×12
2 Universidad Libre de ColombiaColombia 63.910.6%177.6×25 +175.1%
3Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador?? 62.919.0%164.0×33
4 Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los AndesEcuador 62.513.7%95.9×50
5 Universidad Rey Juan CarlosSpain 62.114.2%30.2×20 +136.8%
6 University of ChileChile 62.09.1%39.1×33 +75.1%
7 Universidad Autónoma de MadridSpain 60.812.0%31.7×31 +32.9%
8 Universidad de SalamancaSpain 60.711.0%19.4×15 +200.3%
9 Pontificia Universidad Católica del EcuadorEcuador 60.017.3%41.4×12 +146.7%
10 Universidad Católica de CuencaEcuador 59.618.4%47.8×24

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Comparative International Legal Studies research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 2% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2016. The fastest-growing topics are Comparative International Legal Studies.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.