Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Biochemistry

Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology

Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology is a research topic within Biochemistry. Science Explorer counts 36k research works in it since 1950. 19.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the metabolism, function, and therapeutic implications of arachidonic acid derivatives, particularly epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs), cytochrome P450 enzymes, and soluble epoxide hydrolase. The research covers their roles in cardiovascular function, inflammation, hypertension, and potential as therapeutic targets.

  • Arachidonic Acid
  • Epoxyeicosatrienoic Acids
  • Cytochrome P450
  • Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase
  • Cardiovascular Function
  • Inflammation
  • Hypertension
  • Eicosanoids
  • Metabolism
  • Therapeutic Target
Research works
36k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
6.8k
per year above
Top-10% rate
19.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
-8%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (655 and 648 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 655 works
  2. 2 China 648 works
  3. 3 Russia 128 works
  4. 4 Japan 127 works
  5. 5 India 126 works
  6. 6 Germany 100 works
  7. 7 Italy 78 works
  8. 8 United Kingdom 71 works
  9. 9 South Korea 69 works
  10. 10 Spain 58 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 31.8%China: 31.4%Russia: 6.2%Japan: 6.2%6 others listed: 24.4%32%largest
United States655 · 31.8%China648 · 31.4%Russia128 · 6.2%Japan127 · 6.2%6 others listed502 · 24.4%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of California, Davis publishes the most Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology research, followed by University of Alberta and Volgograd State Technical University.

Who are the leading researchers in Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology include Giuseppe Remuzzi, Walter C. Willett and Dariush Mozaffarian.

  1. 1 Giuseppe Remuzzi Italy 8.1k citations
  2. 2 Walter C. Willett United States 6.8k citations
  3. 3 Dariush Mozaffarian United States 5.2k citations
  4. 4 Deepak L. Bhatt United States 4.2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology research done?

The largest centres of Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Moscow (Russia) and Tokyo (Japan). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Davis.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 75 works
  2. 2 Shanghai China 43 works
  3. 3 Moscow Russia 43 works
  4. 4 Tokyo Japan 40 works
  5. 5 Guangzhou China 36 works
  6. 6 Wuhan China 31 works
  7. 7 Nanjing China 29 works
  8. 8 Seoul South Korea 27 works
  9. 9 New York United States 25 works
  10. 10 London United Kingdom 24 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. DavisUS · 22.4 works11×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology than the world average.

See Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology on the map

Where is the best place to study Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology?

Among universities, judged by research, University of California, Davis, Harvard University and University of Alberta score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 13.45%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of California, Davis: 22, 12.2%Harvard University: 9, 32.0%University of Alberta: 12, 7.8%Volgograd State Technical University: 11, 0.0%University of Michigan: 9, 16.2%University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: 11, 9.3%Michigan State University: 8, 18.0%University of Pittsburgh: 8, 17.6%University of Arizona: 8, 9.5%Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College: 8, 11.9%Harvard UniversityUniversity of Califo…University of AlbertaVolgograd State Tech…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of California, DavisUnited States 64.312.2%10.8×22 +1.1%
2 Harvard UniversityUnited States 41.832.0%2.5×9 -26.1%
3 University of AlbertaCanada 34.27.8%5.1×12 -22.3%
4 Volgograd State Technical UniversityRussia 32.60.0%54.8×11 -5.6%
5 University of MichiganUnited States 31.616.2%2.5×9 +74.0%
6 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States 30.99.3%2.3×11 +157.6%
7 Michigan State UniversityUnited States 30.018.0%4.3×8 -23.4%
8 University of PittsburghUnited States 29.417.6%4.0×8 -1.2%
9 University of ArizonaUnited States 23.59.5%4.6×8 -0.0%
10 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 18.011.9%3.2×8 -23.2%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 8% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2008.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.