Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Integrated Water Resources Management

Integrated Water Resources Management is a research topic within Water Science and Technology. Science Explorer counts 15k research works in it since 1950. 3.2% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics related to integrated water resources management, including water quality assessment, catchment management, eutrophication, groundwater hydrology, surface water assessment, small water retention, agricultural impact on water resources, environmental improvement options, flood hazards, and hydrological transformations. The papers provide insights into the challenges and strategies for sustainable water management in various environmental and land use contexts.

  • Water Quality
  • Catchment Management
  • Eutrophication
  • Groundwater Hydrology
  • Surface Water Assessment
  • Small Water Retention
  • Agricultural Impact
  • Environmental Improvement
  • Flood Hazards
  • Hydrological Transformations
Research works
15k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
461
per year above
Top-10% rate
3.2%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
-57%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Integrated Water Resources Management research?

By volume, Poland and the United States publish the most (397 and 31 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Poland 397 works
  2. 2 United States 31 works
  3. 3 Russia 31 works
  4. 4 Czechia 29 works
  5. 5 Ukraine 27 works
  6. 6 China 19 works
  7. 7 Slovakia 14 works
  8. 8 Indonesia 9 works
  9. 9 Romania 9 works
  10. 10 Lithuania 8 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Poland: 69.2%United States: 5.4%Russia: 5.3%Czechia: 5.0%6 others listed: 15.1%69%largest
Poland397 · 69.2%United States31 · 5.4%Russia31 · 5.3%Czechia29 · 5.0%6 others listed86 · 15.1%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Integrated Water Resources Management research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Life Sciences in Poznań publishes the most Integrated Water Resources Management research, followed by Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań and University of Silesia in Katowice.

Where is Integrated Water Resources Management research done?

The largest centres of Integrated Water Resources Management research in 2022–2025 are Warsaw (Poland), Poznań (Poland), Krakow (Poland) and Lublin (Poland). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Poznań, Wrocław and Lublin.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Warsaw Poland 84 works
  2. 2 Poznań Poland 50 works
  3. 3 Krakow Poland 46 works
  4. 4 Lublin Poland 25 works
  5. 5 Wrocław Poland 24 works
  6. 6 Katowice Poland 19 works
  7. 7 Gdańsk Poland 17 works
  8. 8 Łódź Poland 16 works
  9. 9 Szczecin Poland 15 works
  10. 10 Prague Czechia 13 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. PoznańPL · 49.6 works73×
  2. WrocławPL · 23.8 works47×
  3. LublinPL · 24.7 works47×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Integrated Water Resources Management than the world average.

See Integrated Water Resources Management on the map

Where is the best place to study Integrated Water Resources Management?

Among universities, judged by research, Jagiellonian University, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań and AGH University of Krakow score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 6.16%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Jagiellonian University: 12, 15.7%Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań: 22, 6.7%AGH University of Krakow: 10, 4.3%University of Life Sciences in Poznań: 24, 3.4%University of Silesia in Katowice: 15, 7.3%University of Gdańsk: 11, 6.2%University of Agriculture in Krakow: 13, 3.7%Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences: 8, 7.9%Warsaw University of Life Sciences: 14, 2.3%Nicolaus Copernicus University: 10, 4.1%Jagiellonian Univers…Adam Mickiewicz Univ…AGH University of Kr…University of Life S…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Jagiellonian UniversityPoland 41.215.7%25.6×12 -35.8%
2 Adam Mickiewicz University in PoznańPoland 36.66.7%81.0×22 -17.3%
3 AGH University of KrakowPoland 34.14.3%39.5×10 +71.9%
4 University of Life Sciences in PoznańPoland 32.73.4%339.8×24 -25.9%
5 University of Silesia in KatowicePoland 32.57.3%104.7×15 -20.1%
6 University of GdańskPoland 25.26.2%73.6×11 -2.7%
7 University of Agriculture in KrakowPoland 22.93.7%240.0×13 -29.9%
8 Wrocław University of Environmental and Life SciencesPoland 21.77.9%172.6×8 -53.3%
9 Warsaw University of Life SciencesPoland 21.12.3%129.1×14 -26.5%
10 Nicolaus Copernicus UniversityPoland 18.74.1%63.7×10 -20.5%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Integrated Water Resources Management research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 57% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2013. The fastest-growing topics are Integrated Water Resources Management.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.