Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Law

Legal Education and Practice Innovations

Legal Education and Practice Innovations is a research topic within Law. Science Explorer counts 29k research works in it since 1950. 16.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the impact of legal education on society, professionals, and access to justice. It delves into topics such as the health impacts of welfare rights advice, lawyer wellbeing, professionalism, ethical codes, and social exclusion. Additionally, it investigates civil justice problems and the role of clinical legal education in addressing societal issues.

  • Legal Education
  • Welfare Rights Advice
  • Health Impacts
  • Professionalism
  • Access to Justice
  • Lawyer Wellbeing
  • Ethical Codes
  • Social Exclusion
  • Civil Justice Problems
  • Clinical Legal Education
Research works
29k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
4.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
16.8%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
-13%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Legal Education and Practice Innovations research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (990 and 325 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 990 works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 325 works
  3. 3 Australia 206 works
  4. 4 China 190 works
  5. 5 India 157 works
  6. 6 Canada 129 works
  7. 7 Indonesia 129 works
  8. 8 Russia 122 works
  9. 9 South Africa 66 works
  10. 10 Nigeria 59 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 41.7%United Kingdom: 13.7%Australia: 8.7%China: 8.0%6 others listed: 27.9%42%largest
United States990 · 41.7%United Kingdom325 · 13.7%Australia206 · 8.7%China190 · 8.0%6 others listed663 · 27.9%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Legal Education and Practice Innovations research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Michigan publishes the most Legal Education and Practice Innovations research, followed by University of Oxford and UNSW Sydney.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 University of MichiganUnited States 17 works
  2. 2 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 17 works
  3. 3 UNSW SydneyAustralia 17 works
  4. 4 Tashkent State University of LawUzbekistan 15 works
  5. 5 The University of MelbourneAustralia 15 works
  6. 6 Australian National UniversityAustralia 14 works
  7. 7 Cornell UniversityUnited States 13 works
  8. 8 University of TorontoCanada 12 works
  9. 9 College of LawLatvia 12 works
  10. 10 Monash UniversityAustralia 12 works

Where is Legal Education and Practice Innovations research done?

The largest centres of Legal Education and Practice Innovations research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), New York (United States), Moscow (Russia) and Melbourne (Australia).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 London United Kingdom 64 works
  2. 2 New York United States 60 works
  3. 3 Moscow Russia 54 works
  4. 4 Melbourne Australia 43 works
  5. 5 Sydney Australia 41 works
  6. 6 Washington D.C. United States 40 works
  7. 7 Beijing China 37 works
  8. 8 Chicago United States 29 works
  9. 9 Brisbane Australia 26 works
  10. 10 Toronto Canada 25 works
See Legal Education and Practice Innovations on the map

Where is the best place to study Legal Education and Practice Innovations?

Among universities, judged by research, Northumbria University, Australian National University and UNSW Sydney score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%25%50%75%mean 25.05%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Northumbria University: 8, 31.5%Australian National University: 14, 14.4%UNSW Sydney: 16, 19.7%College of Law: 12, 7.0%Queen's University Belfast: 10, 26.6%Tashkent State University of Law: 15, 7.4%University of Calgary: 10, 63.5%Queen's University: 9, 39.1%The University of Melbourne: 15, 21.9%The University of Adelaide: 8, 19.4%Northumbria UniversityUNSW SydneyAustralian National …College of Law
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Northumbria UniversityUnited Kingdom 58.031.5%11.0×8 +61.3%
2 Australian National UniversityAustralia 56.514.4%8.8×14 +43.6%
3 UNSW SydneyAustralia 52.119.7%6.0×16 +20.7%
4 College of LawLatvia 51.67.0%75.1×12 -26.7%
5 Queen's University BelfastUnited Kingdom 50.826.6%9.0×10 +8.4%
6 Tashkent State University of LawUzbekistan 50.67.4%47.1×15 —
7 University of CalgaryCanada 50.663.5%4.6×10 -4.7%
8 Queen's UniversityCanada 48.639.1%6.8×9 +47.1%
9 The University of MelbourneAustralia 44.721.9%4.7×15 +16.0%
10 The University of AdelaideAustralia 41.019.4%5.7×8 +102.9%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Legal Education and Practice Innovations research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 13% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2011.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.