National Identity and Symbolism
National Identity and Symbolism is a research topic within Sociology and Political Science. Science Explorer counts 1.8k research works in it since 1950. 10.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the role of national symbols, such as postage stamps, banknotes, and national anthems, in the construction of national identity. It delves into the use of iconography and political imagery on currency, as well as the symbolic constructions embedded in these national symbols.
- National Symbols
- Identity Construction
- Postage Stamps
- Banknotes
- National Anthems
- Iconography
- National Identity
- Political Imagery
- Currency Design
- Symbolic Constructions
- Research works
- 1.8k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 192 per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 10.5% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
- +17% the tick is no change
- Largest producer
United States
36% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Which countries lead National Identity and Symbolism research?
By volume, the United States and Russia publish the most (84 and 25 works in 2022-now).
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
United States 84 works
- 2
Russia 25 works
- 3
Türkiye 21 works
- 4
Ukraine 21 works
- 5
United Kingdom 21 works
- 6
Germany 17 works
- 7
China 16 works
- 8
Spain 11 works
- 9
South Africa 8 works
- 10
Australia 8 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead National Identity and Symbolism research?
By volume in 2022-now, Weatherford College publishes the most National Identity and Symbolism research, followed by Russian Academy of Sciences and University of the Visual & Performing Arts.
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
Weatherford College
United States 4 works
- 2
Russian Academy of Sciences
Russia 4 works
- 3
University of the Visual & Performing Arts
Sri Lanka 3 works
- 4
University of Kentucky
United States 3 works
- 5
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
France 3 works
- 6
University of South Africa
South Africa 2 works
- 7
Chinese Academy of Sciences
China 2 works
- 8
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Ukraine 2 works
- 9
Universiti Teknologi MARA
Malaysia 2 works
- 10
Universidad San Jorge
Spain 2 works
Who are the leading researchers in National Identity and Symbolism?
The most-cited researchers publishing on National Identity and Symbolism include Damià Barceló.
- 1
Damià Barceló
Spain 132k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is National Identity and Symbolism research done?
The largest centres of National Identity and Symbolism research in 2022-now are Moscow (Russia), Kyiv (Ukraine), Beijing (China) and Tokyo (Japan).
Largest cities, 2022-now
- 1
Moscow
Russia 9 works
- 2
Kyiv
Ukraine 7 works
- 3
Beijing
China 5 works
- 4
Tokyo
Japan 4 works
- 5
London
United Kingdom 4 works
- 6
Saint Petersburg
Russia 4 works
- 7
Weatherford
United States 4 works
- 8
Washington D.C.
United States 4 works
- 9
New York
United States 4 works
- 10
Budapest
Hungary 4 works
Is National Identity and Symbolism research growing?
Output in 2022-2025 was 17% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are National Identity and Symbolism.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is National Identity and Symbolism as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0012% in 2024.
Fractional works of National Identity and Symbolism over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year.
Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about National Identity and Symbolism. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.