Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Safety Research

Social impacts of COVID-19

Social impacts of COVID-19 is a research topic within Safety Research. Science Explorer counts 3.6k research works in it since 1970. 9.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the epistemological foundations and practical applications of mixed methods research, particularly in the fields of social sciences, education, and organizational change. It covers topics such as the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods, strategy execution in emerging economies, digital competency in teacher training, and cultural agency.

  • Mixed Methods
  • Research
  • Qualitative
  • Quantitative
  • Social Sciences
  • Strategy Execution
  • Digital Competency
  • Organizational Change
  • Education
  • Cultural Agency
Research works
3.6k
fractional, since 1970
In the world top 10%
352
per year above
Top-10% rate
9.9%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+336%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Social impacts of COVID-19 research?

By volume, Ecuador and Peru publish the most (319 and 277 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Ecuador 319 works
  2. 2 Peru 277 works
  3. 3 Mexico 198 works
  4. 4 Colombia 146 works
  5. 5 Spain 101 works
  6. 6 Chile 64 works
  7. 7 Brazil 41 works
  8. 8 Argentina 41 works
  9. 9 Panama 36 works
  10. 10 ?? 31 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Ecuador: 25.4%Peru: 22.1%Mexico: 15.8%Colombia: 11.7%6 others listed: 25.0%25%largest
Ecuador319 · 25.4%Peru277 · 22.1%Mexico198 · 15.8%Colombia146 · 11.7%6 others listed313 · 25.0%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Social impacts of COVID-19 research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Universidad César Vallejo publishes the most Social impacts of COVID-19 research, followed by Universidad Estatal de Milagro and National University of San Marcos.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Universidad César VallejoPeru 86 works
  2. 2 Universidad Estatal de MilagroEcuador 41 works
  3. 3 National University of San MarcosPeru 29 works
  4. 4 Ação EducativaBrazil 26 works
  5. 5 Universidad Estatal Península de Santa ElenaEcuador 24 works
  6. 6 Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de ManabíEcuador 19 works
  7. 7 University of GuayaquilEcuador 19 works
  8. 8 Universidad Metropolitana de Educación, Ciencia y TecnologíaPanama 17 works
  9. 9 Universidad de PanamáPanama 16 works
  10. 10 Universidad Técnica de AmbatoEcuador 15 works

Where is Social impacts of COVID-19 research done?

The largest centres of Social impacts of COVID-19 research in 2022–2025 are Trujillo (Peru), Lima (Peru), Guayaquil (Ecuador) and Bogotá (Colombia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in La Libertad, Trujillo and Guayaquil.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Trujillo Peru 100 works
  2. 2 Lima Peru 98 works
  3. 3 Guayaquil Ecuador 69 works
  4. 4 Bogotá Colombia 52 works
  5. 5 Mexico City Mexico 48 works
  6. 6 Panama City Panama 35 works
  7. 7 Ambato Ecuador 33 works
  8. 8 Quito Ecuador 33 works
  9. 9 São Paulo Brazil 31 works
  10. 10 Santiago Chile 28 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. La LibertadEC · 24.3 works318×
  2. TrujilloPE · 99.7 works160×
  3. GuayaquilEC · 69.4 works100×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Social impacts of COVID-19 than the world average.

See Social impacts of COVID-19 on the map

Where is the best place to study Social impacts of COVID-19?

Among universities, judged by research, Universidad César Vallejo, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador and Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 11.83%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Universidad César Vallejo: 86, 13.3%Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador: 12, 19.7%Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios: 9, 13.4%Universidad Tecnica de Machala: 8, 17.8%National University of Education Enrique Guzmán y Valle: 9, 13.3%Universidad de Panamá: 16, 9.7%Universidad Técnica de Manabí: 13, 10.1%Universidad Estatal de Milagro: 41, 3.3%Universidad Metropolitana de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología: 17, 8.8%Universidad Técnica de Ambato: 15, 8.9%Pontificia Universid…Universidad Tecnica …Corporación Universi…Universidad César Va…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Universidad César VallejoPeru 72.213.3%222.9×86 —
2 Pontificia Universidad Católica del EcuadorEcuador 66.919.7%69.5×12 —
3 Corporación Universitaria Minuto de DiosColombia 62.713.4%89.8×9 +283.3%
4 Universidad Tecnica de MachalaEcuador 59.317.8%69.2×8 —
5 National University of Education Enrique Guzmán y VallePeru 53.113.3%305.4×9 —
6 Universidad de PanamáPanama 53.09.7%103.2×16 —
7 Universidad Técnica de ManabíEcuador 52.410.1%67.0×13 —
8 Universidad Estatal de MilagroEcuador 51.53.3%257.5×41 —
9 Universidad Metropolitana de Educación, Ciencia y TecnologíaPanama 51.58.8%205.7×17 —
10 Universidad Técnica de AmbatoEcuador 51.28.9%72.1×15 —

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Social impacts of COVID-19 research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 336% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2026. The fastest-growing topics are Social impacts of COVID-19.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.