Bayer (Germany) vs Tilburg University
On research quality in 2022-now, Bayer (Germany) ranks #919 in the world and Tilburg University #921, of 22,385 institutions. Bayer (Germany) stands higher in 5 of the 14 fields both publish in, Tilburg University in 9.
Compare other institutions
Bayer (Germany)
- World rank, 2022-now
- #919
- #1,159 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 2.5k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 12.3%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 21%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Theoretical Computer Science, Chemical Health and Safety, General Decision Sciences.
Tilburg University
- World rank, 2022-now
- #921
- #967 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 3.7k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 14.3%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 56%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Medical Terminology, General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Tilburg University leads on 5 of 8 measures: output, top-10% rate, citations per work, open access and international co-authorship. Bayer (Germany) leads on 3 of 8 measures: research quality, citation excellence for its fields and growth.
- #919Research qualityworld rank of 22,385 institutions, 2022-now#921
- 1.39×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.34×
- 2.5kOutputfractional works, 2022-now3.7k
- 12.3%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited14.3%
- 21.9Citations per workall time, per fractional work28.8
- 21%Open accessof its works free to read, all time56%
- 23%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time28%
- +4%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+0%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Bayer (Germany) stands higher in 5 of 14 fields, Tilburg University in 9. Tilburg University leads most in Business, Management and Accounting (#369 against #1,724); Bayer (Germany) leads most in Medicine (#740 against #1,578). Each bar is that side's standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #654Agricultural and Biological Sciences-
- -Arts and Humanities#552
- #705Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-
- #1,724Business, Management and Accounting#369
- #2,552Computer Science#833
- -Decision Sciences#296
- -Economics, Econometrics and Finance#514
- #3,249Engineering#3,728
- #1,613Environmental Science-
- #984Health Professions#675
- #740Medicine#1,578
- -Neuroscience#589
- -Psychology#243
- #3,513Social Sciences#464
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Bayer (Germany) rank | Tilburg University rank | Bayer (Germany) top 10% | Tilburg University top 10% | Bayer (Germany) works | Tilburg University works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #654 | - | 11.2% | - | 227 | - |
| Arts and Humanities | - | #552 | - | 20.3% | - | 202 |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #705 | - | 16.2% | - | 223 | - |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #1,724 | #369 | 2.5% | 15.2% | 118 | 372 |
| Computer Science | #2,552 | #833 | 7.4% | 11.6% | 85 | 279 |
| Decision Sciences | - | #296 | - | 12.0% | - | 111 |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | - | #514 | - | 12.1% | - | 247 |
| Engineering | #3,249 | #3,728 | 4.6% | 11.6% | 156 | 80 |
| Environmental Science | #1,613 | - | 4.9% | - | 115 | - |
| Health Professions | #984 | #675 | 6.3% | 11.1% | 68 | 147 |
| Medicine | #740 | #1,578 | 20.4% | 13.2% | 686 | 248 |
| Neuroscience | - | #589 | - | 12.3% | - | 120 |
| Psychology | - | #243 | - | 15.1% | - | 458 |
| Social Sciences | #3,513 | #464 | 2.8% | 15.5% | 134 | 918 |
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world's share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Chemical Engineering0.6× 0.0×
- Materials Science0.4× 0.0×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics2.9× 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.9× 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology1.3× 0.1×
- Veterinary2.0× 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences2.1× 0.1×
- Chemistry1.1× 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.5× 0.1×
- Medicine1.6× 0.4×
- Dentistry0.1× 0.0×
- Nursing1.0× 0.3×
- Engineering0.5× 0.2×
- Environmental Science1.0× 0.4×
- Physics and Astronomy0.5× 0.2×
- Mathematics1.2× 1.3×
- Energy0.4× 0.5×
- Health Professions1.1× 1.6×
- Computer Science0.5× 1.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting1.5× 3.3×
- Arts and Humanities0.8× 2.1×
- Decision Sciences1.0× 3.4×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.0× 3.2×
- Neuroscience0.6× 2.2×
- Social Sciences0.4× 2.1×
- Psychology0.8× 4.5×
Location quotient in 2022-now: the share of each side's research in the field over the world's share. 1× is the world's balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Bayer (Germany) leans further are at the top, Tilburg University's at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Bayer (Germany)
- Patient Rights
- Medical Ethics
- Omni-Channel Strategy
- Business Models
- Informed Consent
- Cardiovascular Events
- Genetic Testing
- Metastatic Prostate Cancer
- Pesticides
- Chronic Diseases
- Food Safety
- Targeted Therapy
- Invasive Species
- Genomic Profiling
- Hormone Therapy
- Digital Transformation
- Big Data
- Sustainable Development
- Climate Change
- Inflammation
- Epidemiology
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Clinical Trials
- Biomarkers
- Immunotherapy
- Biodiversity
- Heart Failure
- Prostate Cancer
- Genetic Mutations
- Clinical Guidelines
- Breast Cancer
- Mobile Health
- Androgen Receptor
- Molecular Biology
- Telemedicine
- Phylogeny
- Customer Experience
- Technology Innovation
- Organizational Change
- End-of-Life Care
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology97◆ 0.99×108 topics
- Inflammation80▲ 1.53×74 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease74▲ 2.6×36 topics
- Climate Change73◆ 1.09×78 topics
- Clinical Trials67▲ 4.1×16 topics
- Sustainable Development61▲ 1.58×34 topics
- Biomarkers60▲ 3.5×18 topics
- Big Data60▲ 2.5×20 topics
- Immunotherapy51▲ 2.9×17 topics
- Digital Transformation50▲ 3.8×12 topics
- Biodiversity45▲ 2.4×26 topics
- Hormone Therapy44▲ 21×3 topics
- Heart Failure43▲ 3.9×14 topics
- Genomic Profiling42▲ 17×2 topics
- Prostate Cancer41▲ 12×6 topics
- Invasive Species39▲ 3.7×18 topics
- Genetic Mutations38▲ 3.5×17 topics
- Targeted Therapy37▲ 6.8×5 topics
- Clinical Guidelines35▲ 4.8×8 topics
- Food Safety34▲ 4.9×11 topics
- Breast Cancer33▲ 5.3×9 topics
- Chronic Diseases30▲ 4.7×8 topics
- Mobile Health29▲ 8.0×3 topics
- Pesticides28▲ 16×3 topics
- Androgen Receptor28▲ 15×2 topics
- Metastatic Prostate Cancer28▲ 27×1 topic
- Molecular Biology28▲ 27×1 topic
- Genetic Testing28▲ 9.7×4 topics
- Telemedicine27▲ 8.2×5 topics
- Cardiovascular Events26▲ 8.7×4 topics
- Phylogeny25▲ 6.1×17 topics
- Informed Consent25▲ 14×4 topics
- Customer Experience25▲ 6.2×3 topics
- Business Models24▲ 14×3 topics
- Technology Innovation24▲ 29×2 topics
- Omni-Channel Strategy24▲ 47×1 topic
- Organizational Change24▲ 12×6 topics
- Medical Ethics23▲ 7.5×5 topics
- End-of-Life Care23▲ 8.2×4 topics
- Patient Rights22▲ 13×2 topics
Tilburg University
- Network Analysis
- Income Inequality
- Fairness
- Self-Regulation
- Mental Disorders
- Sovereignty
- Personality Traits
- Labor Market
- Neuroscience
- Regulation
- Social Capital
- Meta-Analysis
- Psychopathology
- Emotion Regulation
- Anxiety
- Corporate Governance
- Ethics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
- Mental Health
- Human Rights
- Globalization
- Social Media
- Depression
- Big Data
- Economic Growth
- International Law
- Emotion
- Global Governance
- Well-being
- Resilience
- European Union
- Trust
- Social Interaction
- Embodiment
- Accountability
- Inclusion
- Transnational Corporations
- Professionalism
- Neural Correlates
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Human Rights186▲ 4.9×56 topics
- Mental Health170▲ 3.2×38 topics
- Globalization166▲ 2.3×99 topics
- Machine Learning119◆ 0.96×67 topics
- Social Media110▲ 2.1×33 topics
- Artificial Intelligence110▲ 2.1×36 topics
- Depression103▲ 3.1×17 topics
- Ethics101▲ 5.3×39 topics
- Big Data86▲ 2.4×23 topics
- Corporate Governance82▲ 3.0×24 topics
- Economic Growth79▲ 2.6×25 topics
- Anxiety70▲ 3.9×10 topics
- International Law69▲ 5.9×24 topics
- Emotion Regulation68▲ 5.8×9 topics
- Emotion67▲ 8.6×11 topics
- Psychopathology63▲ 9.6×3 topics
- Global Governance63▲ 7.0×18 topics
- Meta-Analysis59▲ 2.7×18 topics
- Well-being58▲ 4.0×13 topics
- Social Capital58▲ 3.0×14 topics
- Resilience58▲ 3.1×14 topics
- Regulation55▲ 2.8×16 topics
- European Union54▲ 6.5×19 topics
- Neuroscience52▲ 4.5×13 topics
- Trust51▲ 4.9×10 topics
- Labor Market51▲ 4.9×13 topics
- Social Interaction51▲ 3.5×10 topics
- Personality Traits50▲ 10×8 topics
- Embodiment50▲ 7.1×6 topics
- Sovereignty49▲ 14×11 topics
- Accountability48▲ 10×4 topics
- Mental Disorders46▲ 11×3 topics
- Inclusion45▲ 8.2×7 topics
- Self-Regulation41▲ 6.1×6 topics
- Transnational Corporations39▲ 40×3 topics
- Fairness39▲ 10×2 topics
- Professionalism39▲ 6.2×6 topics
- Income Inequality37▲ 7.1×6 topics
- Neural Correlates36▲ 9.8×7 topics
- Network Analysis35▲ 8.1×4 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Tilburg University has out-published Bayer (Germany) every year since 2016, when it overtook it.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Which publishes more research, Bayer (Germany) or Tilburg University?
Tilburg University publishes 1.5× as much research as Bayer (Germany) in 2022-now (3.7k against 2.5k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Bayer (Germany) or Tilburg University?
14.3% of Tilburg University's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 12.3% for Bayer (Germany).
Is Bayer (Germany) or Tilburg University growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +4% against 2018-21 for Bayer (Germany), and +0% for Tilburg University.
Which has more open access research, Bayer (Germany) or Tilburg University?
56% of Tilburg University's research is free to read, against 21% of Bayer (Germany)'s.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Bayer (Germany)
- 1 Peter Kolkhof #14,970 worldwide 15k citations · 177 works
- 2 Ralf Nauen #16,364 worldwide 31k citations · 367 works
- 3 Anthonie W.A. Lensing #39,039 worldwide 17k citations · 128 works
- 4 Lothar Roessig #48,394 worldwide 6.7k citations · 114 works
- 5 Djork-Arné Clevert #58,394 worldwide 8.6k citations · 119 works
Tilburg University
- 1 Thorsten Beck #18,613 worldwide 36k citations · 310 works
- 2 Dorien T. A. M. Kooij #42,040 worldwide 7.3k citations · 127 works
- 3 Jelte M. Wicherts #45,873 worldwide 17k citations · 304 works
- 4 Mark John Brandt #49,289 worldwide 11k citations · 295 works
- 5 Jaap J. A. Denissen #68,180 worldwide 20k citations · 327 works