Harbin Engineering University vs Wake Forest University
On research quality in 2022-now, Wake Forest University ranks #772 in the world and Harbin Engineering University #774, of 22,385 institutions. Harbin Engineering University stands higher in 9 of the 18 fields both publish in, Wake Forest University in 9.
Compare other institutions
Harbin Engineering University
- World rank, 2022-now
- #774
- #965 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 12k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 11.9%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 22%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Ocean Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Computational Mechanics.
Wake Forest University
- World rank, 2022-now
- #772
- #680 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 7.2k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 9.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 33%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Transplantation, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Family Practice.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Harbin Engineering University leads on 4 of 8 measures: citation excellence for its fields, output, top-10% rate and growth. Wake Forest University leads on 4 of 8 measures: research quality, citations per work, open access and international co-authorship.
- #774Research qualityworld rank of 22,385 institutions, 2022-now#772
- 1.06×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.83×
- 12kOutputfractional works, 2022-now7.2k
- 11.9%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited9.6%
- 10.1Citations per workall time, per fractional work31.4
- 22%Open accessof its works free to read, all time33%
- 8%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time9%
- +45%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+7%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Harbin Engineering University stands higher in 9 of 18 fields, Wake Forest University in 9. Harbin Engineering University leads most in Computer Science (#430 against #1,752); Wake Forest University leads most in Medicine (#274 against #2,713). Each bar is that side's standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- -Arts and Humanities#601
- #1,283Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#677
- #1,259Business, Management and Accounting-
- #430Computer Science#1,752
- #422Decision Sciences-
- #616Earth and Planetary Sciences-
- #972Economics, Econometrics and Finance#811
- #373Energy-
- #184Engineering#978
- #1,024Environmental Science#1,621
- -Health Professions#500
- -Immunology and Microbiology#374
- #286Materials Science-
- #2,713Medicine#274
- -Neuroscience#492
- #729Physics and Astronomy-
- -Psychology#717
- -Social Sciences#2,022
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Harbin Engineering University rank | Wake Forest University rank | Harbin Engineering University top 10% | Wake Forest University top 10% | Harbin Engineering University works | Wake Forest University works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | - | #601 | - | 9.7% | - | 129 |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #1,283 | #677 | 14.9% | 9.4% | 71 | 469 |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #1,259 | - | 19.2% | - | 122 | - |
| Computer Science | #430 | #1,752 | 10.7% | 9.2% | 1.7k | 133 |
| Decision Sciences | #422 | - | 11.1% | - | 119 | - |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #616 | - | 11.2% | - | 372 | - |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #972 | #811 | 16.2% | 12.3% | 95 | 104 |
| Energy | #373 | - | 9.8% | - | 112 | - |
| Engineering | #184 | #978 | 12.2% | 9.3% | 6k | 174 |
| Environmental Science | #1,024 | #1,621 | 11.3% | 10.4% | 340 | 90 |
| Health Professions | - | #500 | - | 9.0% | - | 291 |
| Immunology and Microbiology | - | #374 | - | 7.9% | - | 111 |
| Materials Science | #286 | - | 12.6% | - | 784 | - |
| Medicine | #2,713 | #274 | 12.6% | 10.0% | 129 | 3.4k |
| Neuroscience | - | #492 | - | 6.9% | - | 270 |
| Physics and Astronomy | #729 | - | 9.4% | - | 267 | - |
| Psychology | - | #717 | - | 7.4% | - | 250 |
| Social Sciences | - | #2,022 | - | 9.7% | - | 434 |
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world's share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Earth and Planetary Sciences2.2× 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering3.2× 0.1×
- Engineering3.7× 0.2×
- Materials Science2.1× 0.2×
- Energy1.2× 0.1×
- Computer Science2.1× 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy1.1× 0.3×
- Environmental Science0.6× 0.3×
- Chemistry0.6× 0.3×
- Decision Sciences1.1× 0.7×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.4× 0.3×
- Mathematics0.8× 0.8×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.4× 0.7×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.1× 0.2×
- Social Sciences0.1× 0.6×
- Arts and Humanities0.1× 0.8×
- Dentistry0.1× 0.4×
- Psychology0.1× 1.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.1× 1.4×
- Neuroscience0.2× 2.6×
- Health Professions0.1× 1.7×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.1× 1.0×
- Veterinary0.0× 0.7×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.1× 1.8×
- Nursing0.1× 1.5×
- Medicine0.1× 2.8×
Location quotient in 2022-now: the share of each side's research in the field over the world's share. 1× is the world's balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Harbin Engineering University leans further are at the top, Wake Forest University's at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Harbin Engineering University
- Stability Analysis
- Maritime Transportation
- Seafloor Mapping
- Marine Sediments
- Disturbance Observer
- Emissions
- Robotics
- Nonlinear Dynamics
- Robotic Manipulators
- Sensor Networks
- Vibration Analysis
- Adaptive Control
- Path Planning
- Microstructure
- Convolutional Neural Networks
- Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks
- Remote Sensing
- Heat Transfer
- Wireless Sensor Networks
- Machine Learning
- Deep Learning
- Neural Networks
- Mechanical Properties
- Numerical Simulation
- Acoustic Communications
- Fluid-Structure Interaction
- Nonlinear Systems
- Multi-Agent Systems
- Collision Avoidance
- Neural Network
- Feedback Control
- Sliding Mode Control
- Turbulent Flow
- Large-Eddy Simulation
- Sparse Representation
- Aerial Vehicles
- Finite-Time Stability
- Acoustic Techniques
- Wireless Communications
- Sensor Fusion
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Deep Learning1,204▲ 2.9×85 topics
- Machine Learning673▲ 1.67×89 topics
- Neural Networks620▲ 3.3×38 topics
- Wireless Sensor Networks504▲ 9.3×22 topics
- Mechanical Properties448▲ 3.8×38 topics
- Heat Transfer391▲ 6.6×20 topics
- Numerical Simulation376▲ 11×14 topics
- Remote Sensing342▲ 2.3×32 topics
- Acoustic Communications291▲ 56×1 topic
- Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks291▲ 56×1 topic
- Fluid-Structure Interaction277▲ 15×6 topics
- Convolutional Neural Networks270▲ 3.1×14 topics
- Nonlinear Systems268▲ 10×8 topics
- Microstructure264▲ 4.2×18 topics
- Multi-Agent Systems254▲ 11×6 topics
- Path Planning253▲ 17×3 topics
- Collision Avoidance244▲ 11×4 topics
- Adaptive Control230▲ 14×7 topics
- Neural Network225▲ 10×9 topics
- Vibration Analysis220▲ 6.8×9 topics
- Feedback Control217▲ 11×8 topics
- Sensor Networks210▲ 7.2×6 topics
- Sliding Mode Control197▲ 24×2 topics
- Robotic Manipulators191▲ 16×3 topics
- Turbulent Flow176▲ 12×4 topics
- Nonlinear Dynamics175▲ 6.5×7 topics
- Large-Eddy Simulation173▲ 7.6×5 topics
- Robotics172▲ 5.8×10 topics
- Sparse Representation171▲ 7.5×6 topics
- Emissions167▲ 7.0×6 topics
- Aerial Vehicles166▲ 27×2 topics
- Disturbance Observer166▲ 28×1 topic
- Finite-Time Stability166▲ 28×1 topic
- Marine Sediments166▲ 21×2 topics
- Acoustic Techniques165▲ 44×1 topic
- Seafloor Mapping165▲ 44×1 topic
- Wireless Communications163▲ 7.7×5 topics
- Maritime Transportation162▲ 24×2 topics
- Sensor Fusion157▲ 12×3 topics
- Stability Analysis154▲ 8.1×5 topics
Wake Forest University
- Prefrontal Cortex
- Mild Cognitive Impairment
- Cognitive Training
- Cognitive Decline
- Mortality Risk
- Neuroimaging
- Heart Failure
- Rehabilitation
- Mortality
- Neurological Disorders
- Guidelines
- Immunotherapy
- Management
- Chemotherapy
- Obesity
- Biomarkers
- Treatment
- Public Health
- Quality of Life
- Inflammation
- Epidemiology
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Oxidative Stress
- Risk Factors
- Aging
- Diagnosis
- Mental Health
- Depression
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Cancer
- Clinical Trials
- Complications
- Global Burden
- Radiotherapy
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Neuroinflammation
- Elderly Patients
- Caregiver Burden
- Dementia
- Vascular Risk Factors
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology673▲ 2.4×129 topics
- Inflammation406▲ 2.6×82 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease268▲ 3.3×37 topics
- Quality of Life257▲ 2.5×51 topics
- Oxidative Stress239▲ 2.0×60 topics
- Public Health212▲ 2.0×56 topics
- Risk Factors207▲ 2.6×36 topics
- Treatment192▲ 2.2×49 topics
- Aging187▲ 4.8×18 topics
- Biomarkers184▲ 3.7×17 topics
- Diagnosis172▲ 2.6×41 topics
- Obesity170▲ 3.1×25 topics
- Mental Health165▲ 1.60×36 topics
- Chemotherapy164▲ 3.2×25 topics
- Depression162▲ 2.6×23 topics
- Management158▲ 2.7×31 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome152▲ 2.6×22 topics
- Immunotherapy152▲ 2.9×19 topics
- Cancer147▲ 1.52×51 topics
- Guidelines132▲ 3.9×13 topics
- Clinical Trials132▲ 2.8×19 topics
- Neurological Disorders118▲ 2.9×20 topics
- Complications115▲ 3.2×17 topics
- Mortality114▲ 2.8×13 topics
- Global Burden107▲ 2.7×12 topics
- Rehabilitation105▲ 3.6×13 topics
- Radiotherapy103▲ 3.6×13 topics
- Heart Failure102▲ 3.2×13 topics
- Alzheimer's Disease100▲ 5.0×7 topics
- Neuroimaging96▲ 4.8×11 topics
- Neuroinflammation83▲ 4.0×6 topics
- Mortality Risk82▲ 4.8×6 topics
- Elderly Patients72▲ 5.8×4 topics
- Cognitive Decline66▲ 7.5×2 topics
- Caregiver Burden65▲ 8.0×3 topics
- Cognitive Training64▲ 9.6×2 topics
- Dementia64▲ 9.3×2 topics
- Mild Cognitive Impairment64▲ 10×1 topic
- Vascular Risk Factors64▲ 10×1 topic
- Prefrontal Cortex60▲ 9.7×3 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Harbin Engineering University has out-published Wake Forest University every year since 2006, when it overtook it.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Which publishes more research, Harbin Engineering University or Wake Forest University?
Harbin Engineering University publishes 1.7× as much research as Wake Forest University in 2022-now (12k against 7.2k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Harbin Engineering University or Wake Forest University?
11.9% of Harbin Engineering University's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 9.6% for Wake Forest University.
Is Harbin Engineering University or Wake Forest University growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +45% against 2018-21 for Harbin Engineering University, and +7% for Wake Forest University.
Which has more open access research, Harbin Engineering University or Wake Forest University?
33% of Wake Forest University's research is free to read, against 22% of Harbin Engineering University's.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Harbin Engineering University
- 1 Piaoping Yang #4,610 worldwide 44k citations · 567 works
- 2 Zhuangjun Fan #5,431 worldwide 39k citations · 267 works
- 3 Yujin Chen #7,214 worldwide 29k citations · 398 works
- 4 Shili Gai #7,988 worldwide 25k citations · 292 works
- 5 Chunling Zhu #10,829 worldwide 17k citations · 225 works
Wake Forest University
- 1 Eugene R. Bleecker #6,672 worldwide 59k citations · 644 works
- 2 Gregory L. Burke #8,324 worldwide 83k citations · 462 works
- 3 Jeff D. Williamson #9,979 worldwide 63k citations · 536 works
- 4 Dalane W. Kitzman #11,455 worldwide 60k citations · 817 works
- 5 Miles R. Silman #12,160 worldwide 9.3k citations · 90 works