Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Compare · Institutions

Ikerbasque vs Universitat Jaume I

On research quality in 2022-now, Universitat Jaume I ranks #761 in the world and Ikerbasque #762, of 22,385 institutions. Ikerbasque stands higher in 7 of the 16 fields both publish in, Universitat Jaume I in 9.

Compare other institutions
vs

Ikerbasque

Spain · Bilbao

World rank, 2022-now
#762
#434 all time
Works, 2022-now
1.5k
fractional
Top-10% rate
15.7%
share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access
67%
of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Structural Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Polymers and Plastics.

Universitat Jaume I

Spain · Castellon

World rank, 2022-now
#761
#818 all time
Works, 2022-now
3.6k
fractional
Top-10% rate
12.7%
share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access
59%
of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Communication, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology.

Who leads, measure by measure?

Ikerbasque leads on 6 of 8 measures: citation excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work, open access, international co-authorship and growth. Universitat Jaume I leads on 2 of 8 measures: research quality and output.

Ikerbasque 62 Universitat Jaume I
  1. #762Research qualityworld rank of 22,385 institutions, 2022-now#761
  2. 1.28×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.02×
  3. 1.5kOutputfractional works, 2022-now3.6k
  4. 15.7%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited12.7%
  5. 31.8Citations per workall time, per fractional work20.7
  6. 67%Open accessof its works free to read, all time59%
  7. 61%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time20%
  8. +20%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change-6%

A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.

Who leads in each field?

Ikerbasque stands higher in 7 of 16 fields, Universitat Jaume I in 9. Universitat Jaume I leads most in Computer Science (#823 against #1,088); Ikerbasque leads most in Materials Science (#195 against #804). Each bar is that side's standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.

Ikerbasque 79 Universitat Jaume I
  1. -Agricultural and Biological Sciences#628
  2. -Arts and Humanities#137
  3. #520Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#1,185
  4. -Business, Management and Accounting#379
  5. #377Chemistry#583
  6. #1,088Computer Science#823
  7. -Economics, Econometrics and Finance#531
  8. #624Engineering#745
  9. #707Environmental Science#1,059
  10. -Health Professions#662
  11. #195Materials Science#804
  12. #1,024Medicine#1,819
  13. -Neuroscience#476
  14. #352Physics and Astronomy-
  15. -Psychology#391
  16. -Social Sciences#295

Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.

The numbers behind each field

Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.

Field Ikerbasque rankUniversitat Jaume I rank Ikerbasque top 10%Universitat Jaume I top 10% Ikerbasque worksUniversitat Jaume I works
Agricultural and Biological Sciences - #628 - 20.4% - 94
Arts and Humanities - #137 - 19.0% - 330
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology #520 #1,185 12.3% 11.8% 112 66
Business, Management and Accounting - #379 - 15.2% - 138
Chemistry #377 #583 13.1% 8.0% 83 75
Computer Science #1,088 #823 17.1% 15.0% 65 246
Economics, Econometrics and Finance - #531 - 15.3% - 87
Engineering #624 #745 13.8% 9.8% 272 446
Environmental Science #707 #1,059 18.1% 8.6% 61 99
Health Professions - #662 - 15.9% - 71
Materials Science #195 #804 13.2% 7.7% 213 125
Medicine #1,024 #1,819 19.8% 11.0% 92 185
Neuroscience - #476 - 11.4% - 76
Physics and Astronomy #352 - 16.7% - 135 -
Psychology - #391 - 12.7% - 214
Social Sciences - #295 - 14.3% - 694

Where does each put its research?

Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world's share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.

  1. Immunology and Microbiology1.0× 0.1×
  2. Physics and Astronomy4.4× 0.6×
  3. Materials Science4.5× 1.1×
  4. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.6× 0.4×
  5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.9× 0.3×
  6. Chemistry4.0× 1.4×
  7. Chemical Engineering4.9× 1.8×
  8. Veterinary0.5× 0.2×
  9. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.5× 0.2×
  10. Neuroscience2.7× 1.5×
  11. Environmental Science0.9× 0.6×
  12. Engineering1.4× 0.9×
  13. Medicine0.4× 0.3×
  14. Energy1.7× 1.4×
  15. Mathematics1.7× 1.5×
  16. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.4× 0.6×
  17. Nursing0.3× 0.4×
  18. Computer Science0.6× 1.0×
  19. Dentistry0.1× 0.3×
  20. Decision Sciences0.4× 0.7×
  21. Psychology0.9× 2.4×
  22. Health Professions0.1× 0.9×
  23. Social Sciences0.3× 1.8×
  24. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.2× 1.2×
  25. Arts and Humanities0.4× 3.5×
  26. Business, Management and Accounting0.1× 1.4×
IkerbasqueUniversitat Jaume I

Location quotient in 2022-now: the share of each side's research in the field over the world's share. 1× is the world's balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Ikerbasque leans further are at the top, Universitat Jaume I's at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.

What is each known for?

The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.

Ikerbasque

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's
All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Biomedical Applications89▲ 5.0×32 topics
  2. Nanocomposites69▲ 5.8×21 topics
  3. Nanoparticles65▲ 3.5×36 topics
  4. Catalysis47▲ 4.8×28 topics
  5. Tissue Engineering45▲ 5.0×12 topics
  6. Energy Storage43▲ 4.5×10 topics
  7. Graphene42▲ 4.1×11 topics
  8. Cathode Materials42▲ 7.2×3 topics
  9. Nanomaterials40▲ 2.6×20 topics
  10. Biosensors32▲ 4.3×12 topics
  11. Self-Assembly31▲ 6.5×12 topics
  12. Drug Delivery31▲ 3.8×15 topics
  13. Lithium-ion Batteries31▲ 5.0×3 topics
  14. Spintronics28▲ 15×4 topics
  15. Rechargeable Batteries24▲ 6.0×2 topics
  16. Conducting Polymers24▲ 12×2 topics
  17. Nanofibers24▲ 7.8×3 topics
  18. Two-Dimensional Materials24▲ 6.9×4 topics
  19. Biodegradable Polymers23▲ 8.8×4 topics
  20. Electronic Structure22▲ 8.3×8 topics
  21. Organic Electronics22▲ 11×2 topics
  22. Flexible Electronics22▲ 8.4×3 topics
  23. Energy Harvesting21▲ 7.7×3 topics
  24. Battery Technology20▲ 4.8×2 topics
  25. Regenerative Medicine20▲ 5.3×6 topics
  26. Health Monitoring20▲ 6.5×3 topics
  27. Nanogenerators19▲ 9.9×1 topic
  28. Wearable19▲ 9.9×1 topic
  29. Lithium-Sulfur Batteries19▲ 9.0×2 topics
  30. Ionic Conductivity19▲ 9.4×2 topics
  31. Stability19▲ 5.7×7 topics
  32. Battery Materials19▲ 7.6×1 topic
  33. Nanostructured Anodes19▲ 7.6×1 topic
  34. Raman Spectroscopy18▲ 6.4×6 topics
  35. Superconductivity18▲ 7.1×9 topics
  36. Entanglement18▲ 7.9×4 topics
  37. Nanostructured Cathodes18▲ 9.8×1 topic
  38. Solid-State Electrolytes18▲ 9.8×1 topic
  39. Room Temperature17▲ 7.7×3 topics
  40. Quantum Computing16▲ 11×4 topics

Universitat Jaume I

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's
All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Globalization175▲ 2.5×84 topics
  2. Education140▲ 2.3×70 topics
  3. Social Media111▲ 2.2×29 topics
  4. COVID-19105▲ 2.3×21 topics
  5. Mental Health98▲ 1.91×41 topics
  6. Educational Technology83▲ 1.97×29 topics
  7. Innovation79▲ 2.1×40 topics
  8. Human Rights74▲ 2.0×39 topics
  9. Welfare State70▲ 25×4 topics
  10. Gender69▲ 3.6×30 topics
  11. Communication68▲ 6.1×17 topics
  12. History66▲ 2.6×35 topics
  13. Efficiency62▲ 5.8×7 topics
  14. Gender Differences57▲ 4.3×15 topics
  15. Semiconductors56▲ 5.4×3 topics
  16. Social Interaction56▲ 4.0×10 topics
  17. Technology56▲ 3.0×18 topics
  18. Corpus Linguistics54▲ 7.1×5 topics
  19. Pedagogy53▲ 3.0×15 topics
  20. Crystal Growth51▲ 5.2×11 topics
  21. Stability49▲ 6.1×7 topics
  22. Light-Emitting Diodes48▲ 8.9×2 topics
  23. Inclusive Education48▲ 3.7×13 topics
  24. Social Networks47▲ 4.9×11 topics
  25. Organometal Halide Perovskites46▲ 12×1 topic
  26. Perovskite Solar Cells46▲ 12×1 topic
  27. Social Movements46▲ 4.3×24 topics
  28. Thermodynamic Analysis45▲ 20×3 topics
  29. Informal Learning43▲ 9.4×5 topics
  30. Latin America43▲ 6.3×18 topics
  31. Digital Media43▲ 6.6×5 topics
  32. European Union43▲ 5.4×12 topics
  33. Digital Divide41▲ 4.4×8 topics
  34. Constitutional Law38▲ 8.1×2 topics
  35. Historiography36▲ 8.3×10 topics
  36. Language Policy34▲ 6.9×5 topics
  37. Social Rights33▲ 31×2 topics
  38. Public Perception32▲ 7.0×6 topics
  39. Spain31▲ 24×5 topics
  40. Political Power31▲ 18×4 topics

Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.

How has their output grown?

Universitat Jaume I has out-published Ikerbasque every year since 2000.

still counting5001kUniversitat Jaume I782 in 2025Ikerbasque351 in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works per year.

Their share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.

still counting0.010%0.020%Universitat Jaume I0.013% in 2025Ikerbasque0.0060% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).

still counting10%20%30%Ikerbasque14.4% in 2025Universitat Jaume I12.5% in 2025200020102020

A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.

Which publishes more research, Ikerbasque or Universitat Jaume I?

Universitat Jaume I publishes 2.4× as much research as Ikerbasque in 2022-now (3.6k against 1.5k fractional works).

Whose research has more impact, Ikerbasque or Universitat Jaume I?

15.7% of Ikerbasque's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 12.7% for Universitat Jaume I.

Is Ikerbasque or Universitat Jaume I growing faster?

Output in 2022-25 was +20% against 2018-21 for Ikerbasque, and -6% for Universitat Jaume I.

Which has more open access research, Ikerbasque or Universitat Jaume I?

67% of Ikerbasque's research is free to read, against 59% of Universitat Jaume I's.

Who are the top researchers on each side?

The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.

Ikerbasque

  1. 1 Pablo Alonso‐González #22,821 worldwide 11k citations · 135 works
  2. 2 Alexey Y. Nikitin #66,442 worldwide 10k citations · 190 works
  3. 3 Raúl E. Angulo #75,891 worldwide 9.6k citations · 291 works
  4. 4 Antonio Dominguez‐Alfaro #75,909 worldwide 7.1k citations · 114 works
  5. 5 Ivo Souza #106,039 worldwide 18k citations · 156 works

Universitat Jaume I

  1. 1 Juan Bisquert #9,844 worldwide 62k citations · 681 works
  2. 2 Sara Izquierdo Zandalinas #11,933 worldwide 14k citations · 118 works
  3. 3 Adrián Mota-Babiloni #17,899 worldwide 6.6k citations · 135 works
  4. 4 Joaquín Navarro-Esbrí #31,923 worldwide 6.1k citations · 136 works
  5. 5 Lubertus Bijlsma #36,413 worldwide 8.9k citations · 170 works