Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Ann Arbor · United States

Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

In research, Arbor Research Collaborative for Health stands highest in Health Sciences (#2,505 of 16,688 worldwide) and Medicine (#2,745 of 14,558 worldwide), over all time.

arborresearch.orgROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#12,421
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#2,578
of 7,310
Research works
376
▼ 25% vs 2018-21
Citations
17k
44.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.9%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.27×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
48%
world 40%
International
32%
world 18%
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

What is Arbor Research Collaborative for Health known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Health SciencesDomain #2,505 of 16,688 21.2%305
MedicineField #2,745 of 14,558 22.1%258

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Arbor Research Collaborative for Health sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Arbor Research Collaborative for Health work in?

In 2022-now, 81% of research at Arbor Research Collaborative for Health is in Health Sciences, 8% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (70%), Health Professions (10%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (4%). It does 3.1× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 54 fractional works · 81.3% of its workMedicine: 46 fractional works · 69.8% of its workNephrology: 14 fractional works · 21.0% of its workSurgery: 4 fractional works · 5.8% of its workEpidemiology: 3 fractional works · 5.0% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 3 fractional works · 4.3% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 2 fractional works · 3.7% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 2 fractional works · 3.5% of its workTransplantation: 2 fractional works · 2.7% of its workRheumatology: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workHematology: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workUrology: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workDermatology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workHepatology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workFamily Practice: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGastroenterology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workInternal Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Professions: 6 fractional works · 9.5% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 4 fractional works · 6.0% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workHealth Information Management: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNursing: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workResearch and Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPeriodontics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 5 fractional works · 7.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 3.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 4 fractional works · 6.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 3.5% of its workMolecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 2.4% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workImmunology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workPhysical Sciences: 3 fractional works · 4.9% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKArbor ResearchCollaborative fo…66fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences6%Physical Sciences5%Health Sciences81%Social Sciences8%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 21 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine4669.8%
    2. Health Professions69.5%
    3. Nursing11.6%
    4. Dentistry00.3%
    1. Social Sciences23.0%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance12.0%
    3. Psychology11.8%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting00.5%
    5. Decision Sciences00.2%
    6. Arts and Humanities00.2%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology23.5%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology11.3%
    3. Neuroscience11.0%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.4%
    5. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.0%
    1. Computer Science11.8%
    2. Physics and Astronomy11.0%
    3. Engineering10.8%
    4. Environmental Science10.8%
    5. Materials Science00.3%
    6. Mathematics00.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.01× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.67× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.27× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.61× its world share, 1 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 1.06× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Computer Science: 0.23× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.16× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.45× its world share, 1 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 0.73× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 3.62× its world share, 6 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 3.63× its world share, 46 worksMedicineNursing: 3.34× its world share, 1 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.22× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.91× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.58× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.24× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Medicine, 3.6×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 21 fields, with their numbers
  1. Medicine3.63×46 works
  2. Health Professions3.62×6 works
  3. Nursing3.34×1 works
  4. Immunology and Microbiology1.27×1 works
  5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics1.06×0 works
  6. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.91×1 works
  7. Dentistry0.73×0 works
  8. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.67×2 works
  9. Neuroscience0.61×1 works
  10. Psychology0.58×1 works
  11. Physics and Astronomy0.45×1 works
  12. Social Sciences0.24×2 works
  13. Computer Science0.23×1 works
  14. Decision Sciences0.22×0 works
  15. Mathematics0.19×0 works
  16. Environmental Science0.16×0 works
  17. Business, Management and Accounting0.15×0 works
  18. Materials Science0.07×0 works
  19. Arts and Humanities0.06×0 works
  20. Engineering0.05×0 works
  21. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.01×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Arbor Research Collaborative for Health?

Ranked on the quality score, Bruce Robinson, Ronald L. Pisoni and Francesca Tentori lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Arbor Research Collaborative for Health.

  1. 1 Bruce Robinson United States · #54,291 worldwide 48k citations · 749 works
  2. 2 Ronald L. Pisoni United States · #55,540 worldwide 27k citations · 374 works
  3. 3 Francesca Tentori United States · #64,089 worldwide 14k citations · 194 works
  4. 4 David A. Goodkin United States · #102,721 worldwide 12k citations · 86 works
  5. 5 Dawn M. Dykstra United States · #346,613 worldwide 6.5k citations · 34 works
  6. 6 Nathan P. Goodrich United States · #366,968 worldwide 6.4k citations · 62 works
  7. 7 Keith P. McCullough United States · #395,478 worldwide 13k citations · 175 works
  8. 8 Brian A. Bieber United States · #420,017 worldwide 5.8k citations · 268 works
  9. 9 Justin M. Albert United States · #432,867 worldwide 4.7k citations · 28 works
  10. 10 S. J. Elder United States · #560,260 worldwide 2.6k citations · 18 works
All ranked researchers at Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

What are the most cited papers from Arbor Research Collaborative for Health?

The most cited paper from Arbor Research Collaborative for Health is "Comparison of Mortality in All Patients on Dialysis, Patients on Dialysis Awaiting Transplantation, and Recipients of a First Cadaveric Transplant" (Robert A. Wolfe, Valarie B. Ashby, Edgar Louis Milford et al., 1999), with 5,394 citations. Next come "Characteristics Associated with Liver Graft Failure: The Concept of a Donor Risk Index" (1,970) and "Mortality Risk for Dialysis Patients With Different Levels of Serum Calcium, Phosphorus, and PTH: The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)" (1,102).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Comparison of Mortality in All Patients on Dialysis, Patients on Dialysis Awaiting Transplantation, and Recipients of a First Cadaveric Transplant Robert A. Wolfe, Valarie B. Ashby, Edgar Louis Milford et al. · New England Journal of Medicine 2 Dec 1999 5,394
2 Characteristics Associated with Liver Graft Failure: The Concept of a Donor Risk Index Sandy Feng, Nathan P. Goodrich, J.L. Bragg-Gresham et al. · American Journal of Transplantation Open access 27 Feb 2006 1,970
3 Mortality Risk for Dialysis Patients With Different Levels of Serum Calcium, Phosphorus, and PTH: The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) Francesca Tentori, Margaret J. Blayney, Justin M. Albert et al. · American Journal of Kidney Diseases 3 Jun 2008 1,102
4 A Comprehensive Risk Quantification Score for Deceased Donor Kidneys: The Kidney Donor Risk Index Panduranga S. Rao, Douglas Earl Schaubel, Mary K. Guidinger et al. · Transplantation 16 Jul 2009 1,083
5 The Survival Benefit of Liver Transplantation Robert M. Merion, Doulglas E. Schaubel, Dawn M. Dykstra et al. · American Journal of Transplantation Open access 11 Jan 2005 877
All 58 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Arbor Research Collaborative for Health?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Chronic Kidney Disease, Cardiovascular Disease, Quality of Life, Inflammation, Mortality, Hemodialysis, Nutrition and Dialysis.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Chronic Kidney Disease14▲ 86×6 topics
  2. Cardiovascular Disease14▲ 18×21 topics
  3. Quality of Life11▲ 12×20 topics
  4. Inflammation10▲ 7.2×25 topics
  5. Hemodialysis8▲ 146×2 topics
  6. Mortality8▲ 22×10 topics
  7. Nutrition7▲ 25×3 topics
  8. Dialysis7▲ 209×1 topic
  9. Peritoneal Dialysis7▲ 209×1 topic
  10. Epidemiology7▲ 2.5×37 topics
  11. Global Burden4▲ 11×8 topics
  12. Heart Failure3▲ 11×8 topics
  13. TGF-ß3▲ 31×3 topics
  14. Fibrosis3▲ 23×3 topics
  15. Diabetic Nephropathy3▲ 67×1 topic
  16. Glomerular Filtration Rate3▲ 101×1 topic
  17. Treatment2▲ 3.1×11 topics
  18. Diagnosis2▲ 3.8×9 topics
  19. Graft Survival2▲ 42×2 topics
  20. Kidney Transplantation2▲ 55×2 topics
  21. Primary Care2▲ 8.8×8 topics
  22. Risk Factors2▲ 3.0×11 topics
  23. Urinary Incontinence2▲ 41×2 topics
  24. Immunosuppressive Drugs2▲ 47×2 topics
  25. Antibody-Mediated Rejection2▲ 71×1 topic
  26. Guidelines2▲ 5.7×8 topics
  27. Hypertension2▲ 9.6×7 topics
  28. Renal Allograft2▲ 71×1 topic
  29. Parathyroid Hormone2▲ 27×3 topics
  30. FGF232▲ 69×1 topic
  31. phosphate2▲ 69×1 topic
  32. Anemia1▲ 21×3 topics
  33. Clinical Guidelines1▲ 7.0×4 topics
  34. Rehabilitation1▲ 5.2×4 topics
  35. Acute Kidney Injury1▲ 38×2 topics
  36. Critical Care1▲ 7.8×5 topics
  37. Iron Deficiency1▲ 38×2 topics
  38. Quality Improvement1▲ 11×5 topics
  39. Renal Failure1▲ 42×2 topics
  40. Stroke1▲ 10×3 topics

Which research topics does Arbor Research Collaborative for Health publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Dialysis and Renal Disease Management, Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes, Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments and Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments.

Dialysis and Renal Disea…7Dialysis and Renal Disease Management: 7 fractional worksChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes: 3 fractional worksRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments: 2 fractional worksParathyroid Disorders and Treatments: 2 fractional worksUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research: 1 fractional worksAcute Kidney Injury Research: 1 fractional worksPelvic floor disorders treatments: 1 fractional worksPotassium and Related Disorders: 1 fractional worksErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment: 1 fractional worksCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis: 1 fractional works
NephrologyTransplantationUrologyRheumatology3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Dialysis and Renal Disease Management Nephrology 7 works
  2. 2 Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes Nephrology 3 works
  3. 3 Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments Transplantation 2 works
  4. 4 Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments Nephrology 2 works
  5. 5 Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research Urology 1 works
  6. 6 Acute Kidney Injury Research Nephrology 1 works
  7. 7 Pelvic floor disorders treatments Rheumatology 1 works
  8. 8 Potassium and Related Disorders Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1 works
  9. 9 Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment Hematology 1 works
  10. 10 Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis Emergency Medical Services 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available47.7%not open52.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors32.1%domestic only67.9%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Arbor Research Collaborative for Health's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 25% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Arbor Research Collaborative for Health as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00025% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%Arbor Research Collaborative for Health0.00019% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Arbor Research Collaborative for Health over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Ann Arbor

All research institutions in Ann Arbor

Share Arbor Research Collaborative for Health's ranking

Arbor Research Collaborative for Health on Science Explorer

A card with Arbor Research Collaborative for Health's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Arbor Research Collaborative for Health. Posts are plain text and can be reported.