Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Research facility · Long Beach · United States

Collaborative Neuroscience Network

Research works
35
▼ 19% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.1k
33.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
12.5%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
49%
world 40%
International
42%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Collaborative Neuroscience Network is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Collaborative Neuroscience Network work in?

In all years, 41% of research at Collaborative Neuroscience Network is in Health Sciences, 24% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (35%), Psychology (13%), Neuroscience (10%). It does 1.6× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 14 fractional works · 41.0% of its workMedicine: 12 fractional works · 35.3% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 4 fractional works · 12.7% of its workEpidemiology: 2 fractional works · 4.3% of its workPharmacology: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workFamily Practice: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDermatology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 5.5% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 8 fractional works · 24.3% of its workNeuroscience: 4 fractional works · 10.3% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workBiological Psychiatry: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workBehavioral Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEndocrine and Autonomic Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 3 fractional works · 9.3% of its workMolecular Biology: 3 fractional works · 8.5% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workFood Science: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workVirology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMicrobiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPharmaceutical Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 7 fractional works · 19.2% of its workPsychology: 5 fractional works · 13.0% of its workClinical Psychology: 3 fractional works · 9.5% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workMusic: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 5 fractional works · 15.4% of its workEngineering: 3 fractional works · 8.1% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 2 fractional works · 4.7% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEarth-Surface Processes: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKCollaborativeNeuroscience…35fractional works, all years
Life Sciences24%Physical Sciences15%Health Sciences41%Social Sciences19%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 19 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine1235.3%
    2. Health Professions25.5%
    3. Dentistry00.1%
    4. Nursing00.1%
    1. Neuroscience410.3%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology39.3%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences13.1%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology01.1%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.5%
    1. Psychology513.0%
    2. Arts and Humanities12.5%
    3. Social Sciences12.3%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting01.1%
    5. Decision Sciences00.3%
    1. Engineering38.1%
    2. Computer Science13.6%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences11.9%
    4. Environmental Science11.5%
    5. Mathematics00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.81× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 2.65× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 4.87× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.77× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 3.41× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 1.50× its world share, 3 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.85× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 0.76× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 1.93× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.57× its world share, 4 worksMedicineNursing: 0.26× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 0.29× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.83× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Psychology: 1.78× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Neuroscience, 4.9×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 16 fields, with their numbers
  1. Neuroscience4.87×1 works
  2. Earth and Planetary Sciences3.41×1 works
  3. Immunology and Microbiology2.65×0 works
  4. Health Professions1.93×1 works
  5. Psychology1.78×1 works
  6. Medicine1.57×4 works
  7. Engineering1.50×3 works
  8. Environmental Science0.85×0 works
  9. Business, Management and Accounting0.83×0 works
  10. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.81×0 works
  11. Computer Science0.77×1 works
  12. Mathematics0.76×0 works
  13. Arts and Humanities0.29×0 works
  14. Nursing0.26×0 works
  15. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.14×0 works
  16. Social Sciences0.10×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Collaborative Neuroscience Network?

Ranked on the quality score, Omid Omidvar and David P. Walling lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Collaborative Neuroscience Network.

  1. 1 Omid Omidvar United States · #439,578 worldwide 4.6k citations · 20 works
  2. 2 David P. Walling United States · #453,236 worldwide 3.6k citations · 99 works
All ranked researchers at Collaborative Neuroscience Network

What are the most cited papers from Collaborative Neuroscience Network?

The most cited paper from Collaborative Neuroscience Network is "Interhospital Transfer Before Thrombectomy Is Associated With Delayed Treatment and Worse Outcome in the STRATIS Registry (Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke)" (Michael T. Froehler et al., 2017), with 425 citations. Next come "Posttraumatic Stress and Depressive Reactions Among Children and Adolescents After the 1999 Earthquake in Ano Liosia, Greece" (397) and "Safety and Tolerability of Multiple Ascending Doses of PRX002/RG7935, an Anti–α-Synuclein Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients With Parkinson Disease" (303).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Interhospital Transfer Before Thrombectomy Is Associated With Delayed Treatment and Worse Outcome in the STRATIS Registry (Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke) Michael T. Froehler et al. · Circulation Open access 25 Sep 2017 425
2 Posttraumatic Stress and Depressive Reactions Among Children and Adolescents After the 1999 Earthquake in Ano Liosia, Greece Alexandra C. Roussos, Armen K. Goenjian, Alan M. Steinberg et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry Mar 2005 397
3 Safety and Tolerability of Multiple Ascending Doses of PRX002/RG7935, an Anti–α-Synuclein Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients With Parkinson Disease Joseph J. Jankovic, Ira J. Goodman, Beth Safirstein et al. · JAMA Neurology Open access 18 Jun 2018 303
4 Preclinical and clinical evaluation of the LRRK2 inhibitor DNL201 for Parkinson’s disease Danna L. Jennings et al. · Science Translational Medicine 8 Jun 2022 266
5 Reconsidering Models of Influence: The Relationship between Consumer Social Networks and Word-of-Mouth Effectiveness Ted Smith, James R. Coyle, Elizabeth Lightfoot et al. · Journal of Advertising Research Dec 2007 250
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Collaborative Neuroscience Network?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Cognitive Therapy, Depression, Social Cognition, Metabolic Syndrome, Antipsychotic Drugs, Neurocognitive Deficits, Mental Health and Public Health.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 35 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 35 words, with their numbers
  1. Cognitive Therapy4▲ 119×2 topics
  2. Epidemiology3▲ 2.3×24 topics
  3. Depression3▲ 12×11 topics
  4. Metabolic Syndrome3▲ 11×2 topics
  5. Social Cognition3▲ 50×2 topics
  6. Antipsychotic Drugs3▲ 173×1 topic
  7. Neurocognitive Deficits3▲ 173×1 topic
  8. Mental Health2▲ 5.9×8 topics
  9. Public Health2▲ 4.9×11 topics
  10. Ethical Considerations2▲ 15×3 topics
  11. Environmental Impact2▲ 3.2×2 topics
  12. Schizophrenia2▲ 32×4 topics
  13. Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases1▲ 407×1 topic
  14. Global Burden1▲ 6.9×6 topics
  15. Neurobiology1▲ 11×5 topics
  16. Prevalence1▲ 9.3×4 topics
  17. Synaptic Plasticity1▲ 12×2 topics
  18. cAMP Signaling1▲ 407×1 topic
  19. Anxiety1▲ 9.2×8 topics
  20. Clinical Guidelines1▲ 11×3 topics
  21. Genetics1▲ 4.4×4 topics
  22. Oxidative Stress1▲ 1.91×5 topics
  23. Resilience1▲ 8.9×3 topics
  24. Sustainability1▲ 1.90×2 topics
  25. Trauma1▲ 17×2 topics
  26. Global Health1▲ 24×2 topics
  27. Healthcare Workers1▲ 22×2 topics
  28. NMDA Receptor1▲ 48×2 topics
  29. Neurobiological Mechanisms1▲ 67×2 topics
  30. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder1▲ 141×1 topic
  31. Psychological Treatment1▲ 141×1 topic
  32. Stress1▲ 8.2×3 topics
  33. Treatment1▲ 2.5×7 topics
  34. Dietary Guidelines1▲ 679×1 topic
  35. Nutrition Science1▲ 679×1 topic

Which research topics does Collaborative Neuroscience Network publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Schizophrenia research and treatment, Concrete and Cement Materials Research, Geophysics and Gravity Measurements and Innovative concrete reinforcement materials.

  1. 1 Schizophrenia research and treatment Psychiatry and Mental health 1 works
  2. 2 Concrete and Cement Materials Research Civil and Structural Engineering 0 works
  3. 3 Geophysics and Gravity Measurements Oceanography 0 works
  4. 4 Innovative concrete reinforcement materials Civil and Structural Engineering 0 works
  5. 5 Concrete Properties and Behavior Civil and Structural Engineering 0 works
  6. 6 Family Caregiving in Mental Illness Clinical Psychology 0 works
  7. 7 Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology Infectious Diseases 0 works
  8. 8 Tryptophan and brain disorders Biological Psychiatry 0 works
  9. 9 Treatment of Major Depression Pharmacology 0 works
  10. 10 Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available48.9%not open51.1%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors42.3%domestic only57.7%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Collaborative Neuroscience Network's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 19% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Collaborative Neuroscience Network as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000049% in 2024.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%0.00015%Collaborative Neuroscience Network0.000060% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Collaborative Neuroscience Network over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Long Beach

All research institutions in Long Beach

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Collaborative Neuroscience Network. Posts are plain text and can be reported.