Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion

Creative Technologies (United States)

In research, Creative Technologies (United States) stands highest in Physical Sciences (#7,654 of 10,670 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence is 6.0× its share of world research).

World rank, 2022-now
#11,095
of 22,385 · #6,229 all time
Rank in United States
#1,534
of 3,332
Research works
678
▲ 24% vs 2018-21
Citations
23k
33.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
15.7%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.11×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
29%
world 40%
International
23%
world 18%

What is Creative Technologies (United States) known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Physical SciencesDomain #7,654 of 10,670 16.3%60 #3923

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Creative Technologies (United States) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Creative Technologies (United States) work in?

In 2022-now, 48% of research at Creative Technologies (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 37% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (32%), Psychology (15%), Social Sciences (13%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 75 fractional works · 47.8% of its workComputer Science: 51 fractional works · 32.5% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 23 fractional works · 14.5% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 12 fractional works · 7.5% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 5 fractional works · 2.9% of its workInformation Systems: 3 fractional works · 2.2% of its workComputer Science Applications: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSignal Processing: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 2 fractional works · 1.3% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workComputer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEngineering: 16 fractional works · 10.5% of its workBuilding and Construction: 3 fractional works · 2.0% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workOcean Engineering: 2 fractional works · 1.2% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMedia Technology: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMechanical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workComputational Mechanics: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAerospace Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 4 fractional works · 2.6% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEcological Modeling: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 2 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGeology: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workChemistry: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workInorganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 57 fractional works · 36.8% of its workPsychology: 23 fractional works · 14.6% of its workSocial Psychology: 10 fractional works · 6.6% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 7 fractional works · 4.3% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 3 fractional works · 2.2% of its workClinical Psychology: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workApplied Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 20 fractional works · 12.6% of its workSociology and Political Science: 6 fractional works · 4.0% of its workSafety Research: 3 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workCultural Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workUrban Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAnthropology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCommunication: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 6 fractional works · 4.1% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workArcheology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHistory: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMusic: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 3 fractional works · 2.2% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMarketing: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDecision Sciences: 3 fractional works · 1.6% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 1.3% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Sciences: 13 fractional works · 8.6% of its workMedicine: 8 fractional works · 5.2% of its workHealth Informatics: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 3 fractional works · 1.7% of its workHealth Professions: 5 fractional works · 3.4% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 2 fractional works · 1.0% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 2 fractional works · 1.0% of its workHealth Information Management: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 11 fractional works · 6.8% of its workNeuroscience: 7 fractional works · 4.3% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 6 fractional works · 3.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 3 fractional works · 1.6% of its workMolecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 1.2% of its workBiophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workToxicology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKCreativeTechnologies…156fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences7%Physical Sciences48%Health Sciences9%Social Sciences37%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 22 fields, with their numbers
    1. Computer Science5132.5%
    2. Engineering1610.5%
    3. Environmental Science42.6%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences21.0%
    5. Physics and Astronomy10.4%
    6. Mathematics10.4%
    7. Chemistry10.4%
    8. Materials Science00.1%
    1. Psychology2314.6%
    2. Social Sciences2012.6%
    3. Arts and Humanities64.1%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting32.2%
    5. Decision Sciences31.6%
    6. Economics, Econometrics and Finance21.6%
    1. Medicine85.2%
    2. Health Professions53.4%
    3. Nursing00.1%
    1. Neuroscience74.3%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology31.6%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences10.4%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.2%
    5. Immunology and Microbiology00.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

What does Creative Technologies (United States) specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Artificial Intelligence takes 6.0× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Artificial IntelligenceSubfield · 22.6 works6.0×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.09× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.30× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 2.65× its world share, 7 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.71× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 0.23× its world share, 1 worksChemistryComputer Science: 4.18× its world share, 51 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.61× its world share, 2 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.70× its world share, 16 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.53× its world share, 4 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.32× its world share, 1 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.18× its world share, 1 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 1.27× its world share, 5 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.27× its world share, 8 worksMedicineNursing: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 1.41× its world share, 6 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.69× its world share, 4 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 1.66× its world share, 2 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.74× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 4.80× its world share, 23 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.00× its world share, 20 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 4.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 22 fields, with their numbers
  1. Psychology4.80×23 works
  2. Computer Science4.18×51 works
  3. Neuroscience2.65×7 works
  4. Decision Sciences1.66×2 works
  5. Arts and Humanities1.41×6 works
  6. Health Professions1.27×5 works
  7. Social Sciences1.00×20 works
  8. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.74×2 works
  9. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.71×0 works
  10. Engineering0.70×16 works
  11. Business, Management and Accounting0.69×4 works
  12. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.61×2 works
  13. Environmental Science0.53×4 works
  14. Mathematics0.32×1 works
  15. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.30×2 works
  16. Medicine0.27×8 works
  17. Chemistry0.23×1 works
  18. Immunology and Microbiology0.20×0 works
  19. Physics and Astronomy0.18×1 works
  20. Nursing0.15×0 works
  21. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.09×1 works
  22. Materials Science0.03×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Creative Technologies (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Paul E. Debevec, Koki Nagano and Graham Fyffe lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Creative Technologies (United States).

  1. 1 Paul E. Debevec United States · #94,795 worldwide 20k citations · 295 works
  2. 2 Koki Nagano United States · #175,443 worldwide 3.6k citations · 92 works
  3. 3 Graham Fyffe United States · #280,210 worldwide 3.3k citations · 53 works
  4. 4 Jay Busch United States · #385,733 worldwide 2.1k citations · 48 works
  5. 5 Ari Daniel Shapiro United States · #484,788 worldwide 2.9k citations · 112 works
  6. 6 Evan A. Suma United States · #499,173 worldwide 3.6k citations · 85 works
  7. 7 Mark T. Bolas United States · #720,802 worldwide 5k citations · 164 works
  8. 8 Xueming Yu United States · #795,265 worldwide 1.5k citations · 34 works
  9. 9 Oleg Alexander United States · #858,211 worldwide 809 citations · 27 works
  10. 10 Yuyu Xu United States · #1,061,029 worldwide 1.1k citations · 25 works
All ranked researchers at Creative Technologies (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Creative Technologies (United States)?

The most cited paper from Creative Technologies (United States) is "Stan : A Probabilistic Programming Language" (Bob Carpenter, Andrew Gelman, Matthew D. Hoffman et al., 2017), with 7,589 citations. Next come "Adaptive control using multiple models" (1,280) and "PIFu: Pixel-Aligned Implicit Function for High-Resolution Clothed Human Digitization" (1,256).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Stan : A Probabilistic Programming Language Bob Carpenter, Andrew Gelman, Matthew D. Hoffman et al. · Journal of Statistical Software Open access 2017 7,589
2 Adaptive control using multiple models Kumpati S. Narendra, Janaki Balakrishnan · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1997 1,280
3 PIFu: Pixel-Aligned Implicit Function for High-Resolution Clothed Human Digitization Shunsuke Saito, Zeng Huang, Ryota Natsume et al. Conference paper Oct 2019 1,256
4 Learning a model of facial shape and expression from 4D scans Tianye Li, Timo Bolkart, Michael J. Black et al. · ACM Transactions on Graphics 20 Nov 2017 1,241
5 On the Continuity of Rotation Representations in Neural Networks Yi Zhou, Connelly Barnes, Jingwan Lu et al. Conference paper Jun 2019 1,205
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Creative Technologies (United States)?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Deep Learning, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Neural Networks, Feature Extraction, Human-Computer Interaction and Social Interaction.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Deep Learning26▲ 4.8×48 topics
  2. Machine Learning19▲ 3.6×44 topics
  3. Artificial Intelligence12▲ 5.3×16 topics
  4. Neural Networks10▲ 4.4×23 topics
  5. Big Data10▲ 6.5×17 topics
  6. Feature Extraction6▲ 8.1×6 topics
  7. Human-Computer Interaction6▲ 20×3 topics
  8. Social Interaction6▲ 9.1×5 topics
  9. Emotion Recognition6▲ 18×3 topics
  10. Convolutional Neural Networks5▲ 4.6×9 topics
  11. Ethics5▲ 5.8×4 topics
  12. Healthcare5▲ 2.6×11 topics
  13. Agent-Based Modeling4▲ 20×5 topics
  14. Simulation4▲ 10×4 topics
  15. Surveillance4▲ 9.6×3 topics
  16. Facial Expression4▲ 58×1 topic
  17. Multimodal Data4▲ 58×1 topic
  18. Reinforcement Learning4▲ 22×3 topics
  19. Virtual Reality4▲ 5.1×4 topics
  20. Pose Estimation4▲ 21×2 topics
  21. Multi-Agent Systems4▲ 12×2 topics
  22. Discrimination3▲ 10×2 topics
  23. Emotion3▲ 10×7 topics
  24. Natural Language Processing3▲ 9.2×6 topics
  25. Trust3▲ 7.9×5 topics
  26. Fairness3▲ 20×2 topics
  27. Learning Outcomes3▲ 5.0×4 topics
  28. Embodiment3▲ 11×3 topics
  29. Social Cognition3▲ 11×7 topics
  30. Topic Modeling3▲ 13×2 topics
  31. Negotiation3▲ 55×2 topics
  32. Transparency3▲ 13×2 topics
  33. Human-Robot Interaction3▲ 15×3 topics
  34. Text Classification3▲ 11×3 topics
  35. Accountability3▲ 14×1 topic
  36. Algorithmic Bias3▲ 21×1 topic
  37. Information Retrieval3▲ 7.8×3 topics
  38. Markov Decision Processes2▲ 73×1 topic
  39. Spoken Dialogue Systems2▲ 73×1 topic
  40. Deep Neural Networks2▲ 13×3 topics

Which research topics does Creative Technologies (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Emotion and Mood Recognition, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Speech and dialogue systems and Topic Modeling.

  1. 1 Emotion and Mood Recognition Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 4 works
  2. 2 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 3 works
  3. 3 Speech and dialogue systems Artificial Intelligence 2 works
  4. 4 Topic Modeling Artificial Intelligence 2 works
  5. 5 Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation Artificial Intelligence 2 works
  6. 6 Face recognition and analysis Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2 works
  7. 7 Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts Human-Computer Interaction 2 works
  8. 8 Human-Automation Interaction and Safety Social Psychology 2 works
  9. 9 Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Health Informatics 2 works
  10. 10 Social Robot Interaction and HRI Social Psychology 2 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available28.9%not open71.1%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors23.3%domestic only76.7%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Creative Technologies (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 24% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Creative Technologies (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00056% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%0.0015%Creative Technologies (United States)0.00072% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Creative Technologies (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

still counting10%20%30%Creative Technologies (United States)13.2% in 2025all institutions10.0% in 202520102020

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 23.5% in 2011.

Other research institutions in Los Angeles

All research institutions in Los Angeles

Share Creative Technologies (United States)'s ranking

Creative Technologies (United States) on Science Explorer

A card with Creative Technologies (United States)'s standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Creative Technologies (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.