Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Utica · United States

Critical Technologies (United States)

critical.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
111
▲ 129% vs 2018-21
Citations
3k
26.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
4.2%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
32%
world 40%
International
24%
world 18%
Critical Technologies (United States)

Not ranked overall: Critical Technologies (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Critical Technologies (United States) work in?

In all years, 60% of research at Critical Technologies (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 22% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (34%), Computer Science (16%), Social Sciences (10%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 67 fractional works · 60.4% of its workEngineering: 38 fractional works · 34.4% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 12 fractional works · 11.1% of its workAerospace Engineering: 8 fractional works · 7.2% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 4 fractional works · 4.0% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 4 fractional works · 3.8% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 2 fractional works · 1.8% of its workMechanical Engineering: 2 fractional works · 1.7% of its workComputational Mechanics: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMechanics of Materials: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 18 fractional works · 16.2% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 5 fractional works · 4.8% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 4 fractional works · 3.8% of its workInformation Systems: 3 fractional works · 2.4% of its workHardware and Architecture: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSoftware: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSignal Processing: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Science: 3 fractional works · 2.8% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workBiomaterials: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workElectronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPolymers and Plastics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnvironmental Science: 3 fractional works · 2.5% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 2 fractional works · 2.0% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workRadiation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNuclear and High Energy Physics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemistry: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGeochemistry and Petrology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workTheoretical Computer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 25 fractional works · 22.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 12 fractional works · 10.5% of its workSociology and Political Science: 4 fractional works · 3.8% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 3 fractional works · 2.9% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPublic Administration: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 4 fractional works · 3.2% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workAccounting: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 3 fractional works · 3.0% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 1.9% of its workFinance: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDecision Sciences: 3 fractional works · 2.7% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArts and Humanities: 2 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPhilosophy: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 14 fractional works · 12.2% of its workMedicine: 9 fractional works · 8.5% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHematology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth Professions: 3 fractional works · 2.9% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 2 fractional works · 1.8% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMedical Laboratory Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNursing: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 5 fractional works · 4.9% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 3 fractional works · 2.7% of its workMolecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 1.8% of its workClinical Biochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEndocrinology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMicrobiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKCriticalTechnologies…111fractional works, all years
Life Sciences5%Physical Sciences60%Health Sciences12%Social Sciences22%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 24 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering3834.4%
    2. Computer Science1816.2%
    3. Materials Science32.8%
    4. Environmental Science32.5%
    5. Physics and Astronomy22.0%
    6. Chemistry10.9%
    7. Earth and Planetary Sciences10.7%
    8. Mathematics10.5%
    9. Energy00.5%
    1. Social Sciences1210.5%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting43.2%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance33.0%
    4. Decision Sciences32.7%
    5. Arts and Humanities21.8%
    6. Psychology11.3%
    1. Medicine98.5%
    2. Health Professions32.9%
    3. Nursing10.5%
    4. Veterinary00.2%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology32.7%
    2. Neuroscience11.3%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology00.5%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.2%
    5. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.38× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.79× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.02× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 2.35× its world share, 1 worksChemistryComputer Science: 2.60× its world share, 3 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.94× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 1.82× its world share, 4 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.56× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.16× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 1.88× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.83× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 1.05× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.92× its world share, 3 worksMedicineNursing: 1.13× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 1.53× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesDecision Sciences: 4.57× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesSocial Sciences: 0.45× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 4.6×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 17 fields, with their numbers
  1. Decision Sciences4.57×1 works
  2. Computer Science2.60×3 works
  3. Chemistry2.35×1 works
  4. Mathematics1.88×0 works
  5. Engineering1.82×4 works
  6. Arts and Humanities1.53×1 works
  7. Nursing1.13×0 works
  8. Health Professions1.05×0 works
  9. Neuroscience1.02×0 works
  10. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.94×0 works
  11. Medicine0.92×3 works
  12. Physics and Astronomy0.83×0 works
  13. Immunology and Microbiology0.79×0 works
  14. Environmental Science0.56×0 works
  15. Social Sciences0.45×1 works
  16. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.38×0 works
  17. Materials Science0.16×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Critical Technologies (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Stuart W. Card lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Critical Technologies (United States).

  1. 1 Stuart W. Card United States · #5,445,669 worldwide 65 citations · 42 works
All ranked researchers at Critical Technologies (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Critical Technologies (United States)?

The most cited paper from Critical Technologies (United States) is "Prognostics Methods for Battery Health Monitoring Using a Bayesian Framework" (Bhaskar Prasad Saha, Kai Goebel, Scott D. Poll et al., 2008), with 828 citations. Next come "Prognostics in Battery Health Management" (594) and "Metrics for evaluating performance of prognostic techniques" (517).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Prognostics Methods for Battery Health Monitoring Using a Bayesian Framework Bhaskar Prasad Saha, Kai Goebel, Scott D. Poll et al. · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 22 Oct 2008 828
2 Prognostics in Battery Health Management Kai Goebel, Bhaskar Prasad Saha, Abhinav Saxena et al. · IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine Aug 2008 594
3 Metrics for evaluating performance of prognostic techniques Abhinav Saxena, Jose ́ R. Celaya, Edward Balaban et al. Conference paper Oct 2008 517
4 Comparison of prognostic algorithms for estimating remaining useful life of batteries Bhaskar Prasad Saha, Kai Goebel, Jon P. Christophersen · Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control Jun 2009 421
5 Modeling Li-ion Battery Capacity Depletion in a Particle Filtering Framework Bhaskar Prasad Saha, Kai Goebel · Annual Conference of the PHM Society Conference paperOpen access 2009 316
All 62 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Critical Technologies (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Healthcare, Machine Learning, Statistical Analysis, Fault Detection, Process Monitoring, Nonlinear Systems, Neural Network and Deep Learning.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Machine Learning7▲ 3.0×19 topics
  2. Healthcare5▲ 6.6×7 topics
  3. Deep Learning5▲ 2.1×19 topics
  4. Statistical Analysis3▲ 22×2 topics
  5. Fault Detection3▲ 24×1 topic
  6. Process Monitoring3▲ 29×1 topic
  7. Neural Networks3▲ 2.7×10 topics
  8. Nonlinear Systems3▲ 13×3 topics
  9. Innovation3▲ 2.8×6 topics
  10. Neural Network3▲ 9.2×3 topics
  11. Parameter Estimation2▲ 15×2 topics
  12. Internet of Things2▲ 3.5×3 topics
  13. Robust Control2▲ 18×2 topics
  14. Stability Analysis2▲ 8.7×2 topics
  15. Thermal Management2▲ 6.4×6 topics
  16. Detection2▲ 6.0×5 topics
  17. Feedback Control2▲ 7.8×3 topics
  18. Adaptive Control2▲ 11×2 topics
  19. Anomaly Detection2▲ 9.6×4 topics
  20. Elderly Care2▲ 11×2 topics
  21. Lithium-ion Batteries2▲ 6.1×3 topics
  22. Sliding Mode Control2▲ 23×2 topics
  23. State Estimation2▲ 21×2 topics
  24. Disturbance Observer2▲ 31×1 topic
  25. Electric Vehicles2▲ 8.9×3 topics
  26. Finite-Time Stability2▲ 31×1 topic
  27. Hybrid Rocket Propulsion2▲ 55×1 topic
  28. Privacy2▲ 8.0×3 topics
  29. Regression Rate Behavior2▲ 55×1 topic
  30. Time Series2▲ 16×3 topics
  31. Constraint Handling2▲ 14×2 topics
  32. Social Work2▲ 17×2 topics
  33. Data-Driven Control1▲ 18×2 topics
  34. Fuzzy Control1▲ 7.9×2 topics
  35. Nonlinear MPC1▲ 19×1 topic
  36. Real-time Optimization1▲ 18×1 topic
  37. Battery Management Systems1▲ 15×1 topic
  38. Cryogenic Storage1▲ 33×1 topic
  39. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)1▲ 33×1 topic
  40. Thermal Runaway1▲ 15×1 topic

Which research topics does Critical Technologies (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Advanced Sensor and Control Systems, Advanced Sensor Technologies Research and Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation.

Blockchain Technology Ap…1Blockchain Technology Applications and Security: 1 fractional worksAdvanced Sensor and Cont…1Advanced Sensor and Control Systems: 1 fractional worksAdvanced Sensor Technolo…1Advanced Sensor Technologies Research: 1 fractional worksScientific Measurement a…1Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation: 1 fractional worksFault Detection and Control Systems: 0 fractional worksAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications: 0 fractional worksPsychosomatic Disorders …0Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments: 0 fractional worksHistory and Theory of Mathematics: 0 fractional worksArt, Technology, and Culture: 0 fractional worksAI-based Problem Solving and Planning: 0 fractional works
Information SystemsControl and Systems EngineeringBiomedical EngineeringStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Blockchain Technology Applications and Security Information Systems 1 works
  2. 2 Advanced Sensor and Control Systems Control and Systems Engineering 1 works
  3. 3 Advanced Sensor Technologies Research Biomedical Engineering 1 works
  4. 4 Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1 works
  5. 5 Fault Detection and Control Systems Control and Systems Engineering 0 works
  6. 6 Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  7. 7 Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments Psychiatry and Mental health 0 works
  8. 8 History and Theory of Mathematics Theoretical Computer Science 0 works
  9. 9 Art, Technology, and Culture Visual Arts and Performing Arts 0 works
  10. 10 AI-based Problem Solving and Planning Artificial Intelligence 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available32.3%not open67.7%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors23.8%domestic only76.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Critical Technologies (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 129% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Critical Technologies (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000084% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Critical Technologies (United States)0.000017% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Critical Technologies (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Utica

All research institutions in Utica

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Critical Technologies (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.