Fauna and Flora International
In research, Fauna and Flora International stands highest in Environmental Science (#3,210 of 5,407 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#14,755 of 17,446 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #18,981 of 22,385 · #19,192 all time
- Rank in United Kingdom
- #682 of 862
- Research works
- 454 ▲ 13% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 7.4k 16.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.9% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.97× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 75% world 40%
- International
- 43% world 18%
What is Fauna and Flora International known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental ScienceField | #3,210 of 5,407 | 10.2% | 179 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #14,755 of 17,446 | 9.8% | 215 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Fauna and Flora International sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Fauna and Flora International work in?
In 2022-now, 49% of research at Fauna and Flora International is in Physical Sciences, 22% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Environmental Science (40%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (14%), Social Sciences (9%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Life Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 23 fields, with their numbers
- Physical Sciences5248.9%
- Environmental Science4340.2%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences43.8%
- Engineering43.3%
- Computer Science10.8%
- Mathematics10.6%
- Materials Science00.1%
- Physics and Astronomy00.1%
- Energy00.0%
- Life Sciences2321.7%
- Social Sciences2220.8%
- Health Sciences98.5%
- Health Professions54.3%
- Medicine43.5%
- Veterinary10.5%
- Nursing00.2%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 8.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 23 fields, with their numbers
- Environmental Science8.09×43 works
- Veterinary4.01×1 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences2.97×15 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences2.45×4 works
- Health Professions1.64×5 works
- Arts and Humanities1.63×5 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.17×7 works
- Decision Sciences1.13×1 works
- Immunology and Microbiology1.09×1 works
- Psychology0.94×3 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.84×2 works
- Social Sciences0.72×10 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.52×0 works
- Mathematics0.49×1 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.36×1 works
- Nursing0.32×0 works
- Engineering0.22×4 works
- Medicine0.18×4 works
- Computer Science0.10×1 works
- Neuroscience0.05×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.05×0 works
- Energy0.03×0 works
- Materials Science0.03×0 works
- Environmental Science 8.1×
- Veterinary 4.0×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 2.5×
- Health Professions 1.6×
- Arts and Humanities 1.6×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.2×
- Decision Sciences 1.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.1×
- Psychology 0.9×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.8×
- Social Sciences 0.7×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.4×
- Nursing 0.3×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Computer Science 0.1×
- Neuroscience 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Energy 0.0×
- Materials Science 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Fauna and Flora International?
Ranked on the quality score, Abigail C. Entwistle, Mark Infield and Pablo Sinovas lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Fauna and Flora International.
- 1
Abigail C. Entwistle
United Kingdom · #488,703 worldwide 4.4k citations · 52 works
- 2
Mark Infield
United Kingdom · #1,136,864 worldwide 1.3k citations · 33 works
- 3
Pablo Sinovas
United Kingdom · #1,263,051 worldwide 461 citations · 51 works
- 4
José Urteaga
United Kingdom · #1,379,827 worldwide 666 citations · 21 works
- 5
Pippa Howard
United Kingdom · #1,762,404 worldwide 328 citations · 18 works
- 6
Jennifer C. Daltry
United Kingdom · #1,978,608 worldwide 2.5k citations · 52 works
- 7
Tony Whitten
United Kingdom · #2,187,756 worldwide 2.4k citations · 95 works
- 8
Evan Bowen-Jones
United Kingdom · #2,696,121 worldwide 657 citations · 17 works
- 9
Simon P. Mickleburgh
United Kingdom · #2,718,791 worldwide 1.2k citations · 39 works
- 10
Laura Benítez
United Kingdom · #3,714,556 worldwide 71 citations · 26 works
Which keywords describe research at Fauna and Flora International?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Biodiversity, Population Dynamics, Invasive Species, Conservation, Habitat Selection, Trophic Cascades and Animal Movement.
- Ecosystem Health
- Acoustic Communication
- Metabolic Rate
- Policy
- Evolution
- Parrot Poaching
- Species Distribution Modeling
- Habitat Fragmentation
- Genetic Structure
- community-based monitoring
- Arctic Indigenous Peoples
- Traditional Knowledge
- Biogeography
- Food Security
- Conservation Biology
- Animal Movement
- Sustainability
- Habitat Selection
- Invasive Species
- Biodiversity
- Climate Change
- Population Dynamics
- Conservation
- Environmental Impact
- Trophic Cascades
- Occupancy Rates
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Vulnerability
- Phylogenetic Analysis
- Ecological Knowledge
- Nutrition Transition
- Molecular Phylogeny
- DNA Barcoding
- Ecological Niche
- Illegal Wildlife Trade
- Taxonomy
- Species Richness
- Climate Change Impacts
- Phylogeny
- Bats
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change21▲ 7.4×39 topics
- Biodiversity14▲ 17×25 topics
- Population Dynamics12▲ 42×10 topics
- Invasive Species11▲ 25×16 topics
- Conservation10▲ 22×17 topics
- Habitat Selection7▲ 95×2 topics
- Environmental Impact7▲ 3.8×17 topics
- Sustainability7▲ 2.7×20 topics
- Trophic Cascades7▲ 69×2 topics
- Animal Movement7▲ 121×1 topic
- Occupancy Rates7▲ 121×1 topic
- Conservation Biology6▲ 52×4 topics
- Biodiversity Conservation5▲ 13×14 topics
- Food Security5▲ 8.7×8 topics
- Vulnerability5▲ 20×3 topics
- Biogeography5▲ 17×14 topics
- Phylogenetic Analysis5▲ 15×10 topics
- Traditional Knowledge5▲ 102×4 topics
- Ecological Knowledge4▲ 91×2 topics
- Arctic Indigenous Peoples4▲ 208×1 topic
- Nutrition Transition4▲ 114×2 topics
- community-based monitoring4▲ 208×1 topic
- Molecular Phylogeny4▲ 22×7 topics
- Genetic Structure4▲ 44×4 topics
- DNA Barcoding3▲ 18×8 topics
- Habitat Fragmentation3▲ 15×4 topics
- Ecological Niche3▲ 52×1 topic
- Species Distribution Modeling3▲ 52×1 topic
- Illegal Wildlife Trade3▲ 201×1 topic
- Parrot Poaching3▲ 201×1 topic
- Taxonomy3▲ 17×8 topics
- Evolution3▲ 9.2×7 topics
- Species Richness3▲ 37×2 topics
- Policy2▲ 11×2 topics
- Climate Change Impacts2▲ 18×6 topics
- Metabolic Rate2▲ 35×2 topics
- Phylogeny2▲ 13×8 topics
- Acoustic Communication2▲ 37×3 topics
- Bats2▲ 59×2 topics
- Ecosystem Health2▲ 41×2 topics
Which research topics does Fauna and Flora International publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Indigenous Studies and Ecology, Species Distribution and Climate Change and Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 7 works
- 2 Indigenous Studies and Ecology General Health Professions 4 works
- 3 Species Distribution and Climate Change Ecological Modeling 3 works
- 4 Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses Nature and Landscape Conservation 3 works
- 5 Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation Ecology 2 works
- 6 Bat Biology and Ecology Studies Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2 works
- 7 Coastal and Marine Management Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 2 works
- 8 Community Development and Social Impact Finance 2 works
- 9 Primate Behavior and Ecology Social Psychology 1 works
- 10 Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Fauna and Flora International's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 13% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Fauna and Flora International as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00037% in 2024.
Fractional works of Fauna and Flora International over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Cambridge
- Tanjungpura University
- Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak
- Pancur Kasih Association
- Panca Bhakti University
- Lembaga Gemawan
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Fauna and Flora International. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
