- World rank, 2022-now
- #6,297 of 22,385 · #2,799 all time
- Rank in Belgium
- #28 of 105
- Research works
- 2.1k ◆ 1% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 75k 35.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 19.5% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.08× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 43% world 40%
- International
- 33% world 18%
What is Fund for Scientific Research known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #3,373 of 9,585 | 23.8% | 117 | #2381 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Fund for Scientific Research sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Fund for Scientific Research work in?
In 2022-now, 56% of research at Fund for Scientific Research is in Social Sciences, 23% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (26%), Psychology (14%), Arts and Humanities (10%). It does 2.2× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 26 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences12655.8%
- Social Sciences5926.1%
- Psychology3214.3%
- Arts and Humanities2310.4%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance62.9%
- Business, Management and Accounting31.4%
- Decision Sciences10.6%
- Physical Sciences5223.0%
- Engineering156.4%
- Environmental Science135.8%
- Computer Science125.3%
- Mathematics31.4%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences31.4%
- Physics and Astronomy31.3%
- Materials Science20.9%
- Chemistry10.3%
- Energy00.1%
- Chemical Engineering00.0%
- Life Sciences2913.1%
- Health Sciences188.1%
- Medicine156.6%
- Health Professions31.2%
- Nursing00.1%
- Dentistry00.1%
- Veterinary00.1%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 4.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 26 fields, with their numbers
- Psychology4.70×32 works
- Neuroscience4.16×15 works
- Arts and Humanities3.60×23 works
- Social Sciences2.06×59 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.35×6 works
- Mathematics1.21×3 works
- Environmental Science1.17×13 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.88×3 works
- Computer Science0.68×12 works
- Decision Sciences0.66×1 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.62×7 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.60×7 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.57×3 works
- Veterinary0.54×0 works
- Health Professions0.47×3 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.44×3 works
- Engineering0.43×14 works
- Medicine0.34×15 works
- Materials Science0.27×2 works
- Nursing0.24×0 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.22×0 works
- Chemistry0.21×1 works
- Dentistry0.15×0 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.14×0 works
- Chemical Engineering0.14×0 works
- Energy0.12×0 works
- Psychology 4.7×
- Neuroscience 4.2×
- Arts and Humanities 3.6×
- Social Sciences 2.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.4×
- Mathematics 1.2×
- Environmental Science 1.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.9×
- Computer Science 0.7×
- Decision Sciences 0.7×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.6×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.6×
- Veterinary 0.5×
- Health Professions 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.4×
- Engineering 0.4×
- Medicine 0.3×
- Materials Science 0.3×
- Nursing 0.2×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.2×
- Dentistry 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering 0.1×
- Energy 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Fund for Scientific Research?
Ranked on the quality score, Christiane Zorbas, Olivier Desmedt and Gaëlle Nicolas lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Fund for Scientific Research.
- 1
Christiane Zorbas
Belgium · #558,805 worldwide 1.8k citations · 31 works
- 2
Olivier Desmedt
Belgium · #827,262 worldwide 1.3k citations · 46 works
- 3
Gaëlle Nicolas
Belgium · #1,645,455 worldwide 2.1k citations · 170 works
- 4
J. B. O. S. Martens
Belgium · #2,583,714 worldwide 1k citations · 41 works
- 5
Frederik Ponjaert
Belgium · #2,763,756 worldwide 188 citations · 41 works
- 6
Catherine Demoulin
Belgium · #3,169,919 worldwide 130 citations · 16 works
- 7
Mia Gosselin
Belgium · #3,757,367 worldwide 82 citations · 16 works
- 8
B. Grassi
Belgium · #3,757,698 worldwide 87 citations · 28 works
- 9
D.Y. Dubois
Belgium · #3,814,675 worldwide 223 citations · 16 works
- 10
Rebecca Gebauer
Belgium · #3,949,158 worldwide 1 citations · 16 works
Which keywords describe research at Fund for Scientific Research?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Emotion Regulation, Globalization, Psychological Well-being, Climate Change, Human Rights, Neural Correlates, Identity Formation and Cultural Psychology.
- Neural Mechanisms
- Environmental Services
- Security Council
- Self-Regulation
- Risk Perception
- Global Governance
- Emotion
- Memory Retrieval
- Community Engagement
- Citizenship
- Land Use Change
- Metacognition
- Autobiographical Memory
- Depression
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Ethics
- Psychological Well-being
- Social Media
- Mental Health
- Globalization
- Climate Change
- Emotion Regulation
- Human Rights
- Anxiety
- Neural Correlates
- Identity Formation
- Cultural Psychology
- Gender
- Narrative Identity
- Ethnicity
- Neuroscience
- Psychopathology
- Episodic Memory
- Democracy
- Immigration
- Social Networks
- Language Development
- Bilingualism
- Cognitive Control
- Tropical Deforestation
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change11▲ 1.84×36 topics
- Globalization10▲ 2.4×26 topics
- Emotion Regulation8▲ 11×8 topics
- Mental Health8▲ 2.5×19 topics
- Human Rights8▲ 3.4×14 topics
- Social Media7▲ 2.4×17 topics
- Anxiety6▲ 5.2×6 topics
- Psychological Well-being6▲ 17×5 topics
- Neural Correlates5▲ 23×6 topics
- Ethics5▲ 4.3×10 topics
- Identity Formation5▲ 90×2 topics
- Biodiversity Conservation5▲ 5.7×8 topics
- Cultural Psychology5▲ 48×2 topics
- Depression5▲ 2.4×11 topics
- Gender5▲ 4.0×15 topics
- Autobiographical Memory5▲ 168×1 topic
- Narrative Identity5▲ 168×1 topic
- Metacognition4▲ 13×4 topics
- Ethnicity4▲ 5.2×8 topics
- Land Use Change4▲ 5.8×5 topics
- Neuroscience4▲ 5.6×7 topics
- Citizenship4▲ 14×4 topics
- Psychopathology4▲ 9.3×3 topics
- Community Engagement4▲ 4.8×5 topics
- Episodic Memory4▲ 165×1 topic
- Memory Retrieval4▲ 165×1 topic
- Democracy3▲ 4.3×10 topics
- Emotion3▲ 7.2×7 topics
- Immigration3▲ 14×2 topics
- Global Governance3▲ 5.9×7 topics
- Social Networks3▲ 5.2×6 topics
- Risk Perception3▲ 5.2×5 topics
- Language Development3▲ 10×5 topics
- Self-Regulation3▲ 7.2×5 topics
- Bilingualism3▲ 9.1×5 topics
- Security Council3▲ 25×2 topics
- Cognitive Control3▲ 19×2 topics
- Environmental Services3▲ 34×1 topic
- Tropical Deforestation3▲ 34×1 topic
- Neural Mechanisms2▲ 11×4 topics
Which research topics does Fund for Scientific Research publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Identity, Memory, and Therapy, Memory Processes and Influences, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Identity, Memory, and Therapy Developmental and Educational Psychology 5 works
- 2 Memory Processes and Influences Cognitive Neuroscience 4 works
- 3 Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management Global and Planetary Change 3 works
- 4 Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments Psychiatry and Mental health 2 works
- 5 COVID-19 and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 2 works
- 6 Mental Health Research Topics Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2 works
- 7 Misinformation and Its Impacts Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 8 Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment Cognitive Neuroscience 2 works
- 9 International Law and Human Rights Political Science and International Relations 2 works
- 10 Behavioral Health and Interventions Applied Psychology 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Fund for Scientific Research's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 1% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Fund for Scientific Research as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00095% in 2024.
Fractional works of Fund for Scientific Research over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 24.2% in 2022.
Other research institutions in Brussels
- Université Libre de Bruxelles
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel
- European Commission
- European Union of Medical Specialists
- European Union
- Institute of Natural Sciences
- IS practice
- European Corporate Governance Institute
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Fund for Scientific Research. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
