Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Ithaca · United States

GrammaTech (United States)

Research works
100
▼ 86% vs 2018-21
Citations
2.2k
22.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
4.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
29%
world 40%
International
13%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: GrammaTech (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does GrammaTech (United States) work in?

In all years, 97% of research at GrammaTech (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 2% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (89%), Engineering (7%), Social Sciences (1%). It does 2.3× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 97 fractional works · 97.0% of its workComputer Science: 89 fractional works · 88.9% of its workSoftware: 26 fractional works · 25.6% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 17 fractional works · 17.3% of its workInformation Systems: 13 fractional works · 13.5% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 11 fractional works · 11.3% of its workSignal Processing: 8 fractional works · 7.7% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 7 fractional works · 7.2% of its workHardware and Architecture: 6 fractional works · 5.6% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEngineering: 7 fractional works · 6.6% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 2 fractional works · 2.3% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workMechanical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 2.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKGrammaTech(United States)100fractional works, all years
Life Sciences0%Physical Sciences97%Health Sciences1%Social Sciences2%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 13 fields, with their numbers
    1. Computer Science8988.9%
    2. Engineering76.6%
    3. Materials Science10.8%
    4. Chemistry00.2%
    5. Physics and Astronomy00.2%
    6. Chemical Engineering00.1%
    7. Energy00.1%
    8. Environmental Science00.1%
    1. Social Sciences11.1%
    2. Decision Sciences11.1%
    1. Medicine10.6%
    2. Health Professions00.2%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Chemical Engineering: 10.89× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringComputer Science: 1.10× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 2.92× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringMaterials Science: 7.64× its world share, 1 worksMaterials ScienceHealth Professions: 2.89× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsSocial Sciences: 0.75× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Chemical Engineering, 10.9×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 6 fields, with their numbers
  1. Chemical Engineering10.89×0 works
  2. Materials Science7.64×1 works
  3. Engineering2.92×1 works
  4. Health Professions2.89×0 works
  5. Computer Science1.10×0 works
  6. Social Sciences0.75×0 works

Who are the top researchers at GrammaTech (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, David R. Cok, David Melski and Denis Gopan lead among researchers whose main affiliation is GrammaTech (United States).

  1. 1 David R. Cok United States · #660,312 worldwide 3.1k citations · 71 works
  2. 2 David Melski United States · #954,773 worldwide 855 citations · 38 works
  3. 3 Denis Gopan United States · #1,123,840 worldwide 790 citations · 17 works
All ranked researchers at GrammaTech (United States)

What are the most cited papers from GrammaTech (United States)?

The most cited paper from GrammaTech (United States) is "WYSINWYX" (Gogul Balakrishnan, Thomas Reps, 2010), with 277 citations. Next come "Local versus Global Lessons for Defect Prediction and Effort Estimation" (262) and "Reducing concurrent analysis under a context bound to sequential analysis" (192).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 WYSINWYX Gogul Balakrishnan, Thomas Reps · ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems Open access Aug 2010 277
2 Local versus Global Lessons for Defect Prediction and Effort Estimation Tim Menzies, Andrew R. Butcher, David R. Cok et al. · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31 May 2013 262
3 Reducing concurrent analysis under a context bound to sequential analysis Akash Lal, Thomas Reps · Formal Methods in System Design 6 Jul 2009 192
4 The Surprising Creativity of Digital Evolution: A Collection of Anecdotes from the Evolutionary Computation and Artificial Life Research Communities Joel Lehman et al. · Artificial Life Open access 9 Apr 2020 185
5 Local vs. global models for effort estimation and defect prediction Tim Menzies, Andrew R. Butcher, Andrian Marcus et al. Conference paper Nov 2011 171
All 57 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at GrammaTech (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Model Checking, Machine Learning, Automated Testing, Software Fault Localization, Temporal Logic, Satisfiability Modulo Theories, Symbolic Model Checker and Code Clone Detection.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Model Checking19▲ 177×3 topics
  2. Machine Learning18▲ 8.5×7 topics
  3. Automated Testing17▲ 598×1 topic
  4. Software Fault Localization17▲ 598×1 topic
  5. Temporal Logic11▲ 151×2 topics
  6. Satisfiability Modulo Theories10▲ 272×1 topic
  7. Symbolic Model Checker10▲ 272×1 topic
  8. Code Clone Detection10▲ 213×1 topic
  9. Refactoring10▲ 213×1 topic
  10. Deep Learning9▲ 4.2×6 topics
  11. Static Analysis8▲ 211×2 topics
  12. IoT Security8▲ 49×2 topics
  13. Formal Verification8▲ 231×1 topic
  14. Type Inference8▲ 231×1 topic
  15. Security Analysis8▲ 66×2 topics
  16. Android Malware8▲ 167×1 topic
  17. Detection8▲ 26×1 topic
  18. Architecture-Based Approach7▲ 234×1 topic
  19. Software Reliability Modeling7▲ 234×1 topic
  20. Distributed Systems7▲ 27×4 topics
  21. Side-Channel Attacks6▲ 123×2 topics
  22. Virtualization6▲ 76×2 topics
  23. High-Performance Computing6▲ 37×2 topics
  24. Control-Flow Integrity5▲ 298×1 topic
  25. Security Policies5▲ 298×1 topic
  26. Parallel Computing5▲ 28×2 topics
  27. GPU Computing5▲ 69×1 topic
  28. Performance Optimization5▲ 48×1 topic
  29. Anomaly Detection5▲ 29×3 topics
  30. Performance Prediction4▲ 71×2 topics
  31. Log Analysis4▲ 110×1 topic
  32. Microservices4▲ 110×1 topic
  33. Model-Based Development4▲ 92×2 topics
  34. Cybersecurity3▲ 24×3 topics
  35. Fault Tolerance2▲ 12×2 topics
  36. Assurance Cases2▲ 317×1 topic
  37. Safety Assurance2▲ 317×1 topic
  38. Metamodeling2▲ 47×2 topics
  39. Information Security2▲ 39×1 topic
  40. Policy Compliance2▲ 82×1 topic

Which research topics does GrammaTech (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Manufacturing Process and Optimization, Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications, Nanotechnology research and applications and Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging.

  1. 1 Manufacturing Process and Optimization Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 0 works
  2. 2 Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications Materials Chemistry 0 works
  3. 3 Nanotechnology research and applications Biomedical Engineering 0 works
  4. 4 Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging Biomaterials 0 works
  5. 5 Polymer Science and PVC Polymers and Plastics 0 works
  6. 6 Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications Biomedical Engineering 0 works
  7. 7 Advanced Cellulose Research Studies Biomaterials 0 works
  8. 8 Combustion and flame dynamics Computational Mechanics 0 works
  9. 9 Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 0 works
  10. 10 Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis Civil and Structural Engineering 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available29.1%not open70.9%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors13.2%domestic only86.8%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has GrammaTech (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 86% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is GrammaTech (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000031% in 2023.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%GrammaTech (United States)0.000038% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of GrammaTech (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Ithaca

All research institutions in Ithaca

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about GrammaTech (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.