Impact Technology Development (United States)
In research, Impact Technology Development (United States) stands highest in Engineering (#4,324 of 11,412 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#8,995 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #14,313 of 28,054 · #13,648 all time
- Rank in United States
- #2,001 of 4,192
- Research works
- 431 ▲ 80% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 18k 41.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 25.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 36% world 28%
What is Impact Technology Development (United States) known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EngineeringField | #4,324 of 11,412 | 41.2% | 168 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #8,995 of 21,541 | 36.5% | 257 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Impact Technology Development (United States) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Nursing, 6.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Nursing 6.6×
- Health Professions 3.6×
- Decision Sciences 3.2×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.1×
- Environmental Science 1.4×
- Psychology 1.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.1×
- Social Sciences 1.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.0×
- Medicine 1.0×
- Materials Science 0.8×
- Engineering 0.8×
- Computer Science 0.6×
- Mathematics 0.5×
- Chemistry 0.5×
- Neuroscience 0.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.4×
- Energy 0.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.4×
- Dentistry 0.4×
- Arts and Humanities 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Impact Technology Development (United States)?
Ranked on the composite score, Carl S. Byington, Michael Roemer and Liang Tang lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Impact Technology Development (United States).
- 1 Carl S. Byington United States · #169,514 worldwide 184 citations · 21 works
- 2 Michael Roemer United States · #209,203 worldwide 139 citations · 31 works
- 3 Liang Tang United States · #848,416 worldwide 98 citations · 37 works
- 4 Antonio Ginart United States · #967,994 worldwide 103 citations · 16 works
- 5 Terry Richardson United States · #1,007,558 worldwide 3 citations · 19 works
Which keywords describe research at Impact Technology Development (United States)?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Public Health, Obesity, Mental Health, Health Outcomes, Social Determinants, Epidemiology, Chronic Disease and Health.
- Income Tax
- Healthcare Interventions
- Chronic Disease Management
- Evidence-Based Practice
- Overweight
- Infectious Diseases
- Childhood
- Health Promotion
- Eating Habits
- Behavior Change
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Mechanical Properties
- Nutritional Consequences
- Food Insecurity
- Social Determinants
- Health
- Education
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Obesity
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Mental Health
- Climate Change
- Health Outcomes
- Physical Activity
- Nutrition
- Chronic Disease
- Health Effects
- Risk Factors
- Adolescents
- Prevalence
- Dietary Behavior
- Ethical Considerations
- Bioinformatics
- Dietary Patterns
- Mediterranean Diet
- Vulnerability
- Global Burden of Disease
- Gender Inequality
- Implementation Science
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology6▲ 1.58×35 topics
- Public Health6▲ 4.1×19 topics
- Mental Health5▲ 3.5×19 topics
- Obesity4▲ 6.2×9 topics
- Climate Change4▲ 1.59×20 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease3▲ 3.0×11 topics
- Health Outcomes3▲ 11×5 topics
- Education3▲ 1.67×15 topics
- Physical Activity3▲ 5.7×5 topics
- Health3▲ 6.9×7 topics
- Nutrition3▲ 5.9×3 topics
- Social Determinants3▲ 13×4 topics
- Chronic Disease2▲ 15×4 topics
- Food Insecurity2▲ 40×1 topic
- Health Effects2▲ 3.9×5 topics
- Nutritional Consequences2▲ 48×1 topic
- Risk Factors2▲ 2.1×12 topics
- Mechanical Properties2▲ 2.4×13 topics
- Adolescents2▲ 5.9×5 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome2▲ 2.6×7 topics
- Prevalence2▲ 4.8×5 topics
- Behavior Change2▲ 13×3 topics
- Dietary Behavior2▲ 156×1 topic
- Eating Habits2▲ 156×1 topic
- Ethical Considerations2▲ 5.5×7 topics
- Health Promotion2▲ 5.9×5 topics
- Bioinformatics2▲ 15×3 topics
- Childhood2▲ 22×1 topic
- Dietary Patterns2▲ 26×1 topic
- Infectious Diseases2▲ 4.7×5 topics
- Mediterranean Diet2▲ 26×1 topic
- Overweight2▲ 23×1 topic
- Vulnerability2▲ 6.7×5 topics
- Evidence-Based Practice1▲ 11×2 topics
- Global Burden of Disease1▲ 5.8×4 topics
- Chronic Disease Management1▲ 7.2×5 topics
- Gender Inequality1▲ 9.9×3 topics
- Healthcare Interventions1▲ 38×1 topic
- Implementation Science1▲ 38×1 topic
- Income Tax1▲ 15×2 topics
Which research topics does Impact Technology Development (United States) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations, Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet and Nutritional Studies and Diet.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations General Health Professions 2 works
- 2 Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior Nutrition and Dietetics 2 works
- 3 Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
- 4 Nutritional Studies and Diet Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
- 5 Health Policy Implementation Science General Health Professions 1 works
- 6 Drilling and Well Engineering Ocean Engineering 1 works
- 7 Evaluation and Performance Assessment Management Science and Operations Research 1 works
- 8 Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research Molecular Biology 1 works
- 9 Child Nutrition and Water Access Nutrition and Dietetics 1 works
- 10 Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics Gender Studies 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Impact Technology Development (United States)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 80% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Ayer
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.