Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Research facility · Zabrze · Poland

Kardio-Med Silesia

In research, Kardio-Med Silesia stands highest in Health Sciences (#13,631 of 16,688 worldwide) and Medicine (#12,055 of 14,558 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, all time
#29,489
of 34,923
Rank in Poland
#364
of 436
Research works
229
▼ 9% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.1k
4.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
3.8%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.85×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
24%
world 40%
International
8%
world 18%

What is Kardio-Med Silesia known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Health SciencesDomain #13,631 of 16,688 5.8%168
MedicineField #12,055 of 14,558 5.9%160

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Kardio-Med Silesia sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Kardio-Med Silesia work in?

In 2022-now, 64% of research at Kardio-Med Silesia is in Health Sciences, 16% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (52%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (11%), Dentistry (7%). It does 2.1× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 15 fractional works · 63.5% of its workMedicine: 13 fractional works · 52.1% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 2 fractional works · 8.5% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 6.0% of its workDermatology: 1 fractional works · 5.3% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 1 fractional works · 4.6% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHepatology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workInternal Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDentistry: 2 fractional works · 7.0% of its workOral Surgery: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workOrthodontics: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPeriodontics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workComplementary and Manual Therapy: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workLife Sciences: 4 fractional works · 16.3% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 3 fractional works · 10.6% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 6.0% of its workCell Biology: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workMolecular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workAquatic Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workParasitology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPharmaceutical Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysical Sciences: 3 fractional works · 12.5% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 4.8% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSurfaces, Coatings and Films: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEarth-Surface Processes: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workModeling and Simulation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 7.7% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workClassics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workConservation: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workALL ITS WORKKardio-MedSilesia24fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences16%Physical Sciences13%Health Sciences64%Social Sciences8%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 19 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine1352.1%
    2. Dentistry27.0%
    3. Health Professions14.4%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology310.6%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences12.2%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology01.6%
    4. Neuroscience01.5%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.5%
    1. Engineering14.8%
    2. Environmental Science13.2%
    3. Materials Science01.7%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences01.4%
    5. Chemistry00.7%
    6. Mathematics00.3%
    7. Computer Science00.3%
    1. Arts and Humanities13.4%
    2. Psychology02.1%
    3. Social Sciences01.7%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting00.5%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.47× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.98× its world share, 3 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.58× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.90× its world share, 0 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 1.30× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 0.44× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.91× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.32× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.65× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.49× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.29× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsDentistry: 14.33× its world share, 2 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.69× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.71× its world share, 13 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 1.18× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Psychology: 0.68× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Dentistry, 14.3×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 19 fields, with their numbers
  1. Dentistry14.33×2 works
  2. Medicine2.71×13 works
  3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.98×3 works
  4. Health Professions1.69×1 works
  5. Immunology and Microbiology1.58×0 works
  6. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics1.30×0 works
  7. Arts and Humanities1.18×1 works
  8. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.91×0 works
  9. Neuroscience0.90×0 works
  10. Psychology0.68×0 works
  11. Environmental Science0.65×1 works
  12. Materials Science0.49×0 works
  13. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.47×0 works
  14. Chemistry0.44×0 works
  15. Engineering0.32×1 works
  16. Mathematics0.29×0 works
  17. Business, Management and Accounting0.14×0 works
  18. Social Sciences0.14×0 works
  19. Computer Science0.04×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Kardio-Med Silesia?

Ranked on the quality score, Krystyna Twardowska-Saucha, Wojciech Bednarz and Adam Konka lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Kardio-Med Silesia.

  1. 1 Krystyna Twardowska-Saucha Poland · #3,016,807 worldwide 188 citations · 19 works
  2. 2 Wojciech Bednarz Poland · #3,734,262 worldwide 258 citations · 19 works
  3. 3 Adam Konka Poland · #5,382,652 worldwide 108 citations · 20 works
All ranked researchers at Kardio-Med Silesia

What are the most cited papers from Kardio-Med Silesia?

The most cited paper from Kardio-Med Silesia is "Magnetic Nanoparticles in Cancer Theranostics" (Oliviero L. Gobbo, Kristine Sjaastad, Marek Witold Radomski et al., 2015), with 466 citations. Next come "The Nanopharmacology and Nanotoxicology of Nanomaterials: New Opportunities and Challenges" (89) and "Titanium dioxide nanoparticles enhance production of superoxide anion and alter the antioxidant system in human osteoblast cells" (80).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Magnetic Nanoparticles in Cancer Theranostics Oliviero L. Gobbo, Kristine Sjaastad, Marek Witold Radomski et al. · Theranostics Open access 2015 466
2 The Nanopharmacology and Nanotoxicology of Nanomaterials: New Opportunities and Challenges Anna Radomska, Jarosław Leszczyszyn, Marek Witold Radomski · Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine Open access 25 Feb 2016 89
3 Titanium dioxide nanoparticles enhance production of superoxide anion and alter the antioxidant system in human osteoblast cells Iwona Inkielewicz‐Stępniak, Karolina Niska, Katarzyna Pyszka et al. · International Journal of Nanomedicine Open access Feb 2015 80
4 The effect of culture media on large-scale expansion and characteristic of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells Justyna Czapla, Sybilla Matuszczak, Klaudia Kulik et al. · Stem Cell Research & Therapy Open access 5 Aug 2019 74
5 CuO nanoparticles induce apoptosis by impairing the antioxidant defense and detoxification systems in the mouse hippocampal HT22 cell line: Protective effect of crocetin Karolina Niska, Maria José Santos-Martínez, Marek Witold Radomski et al. · Toxicology in Vitro 18 Feb 2015 71
All 61 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Kardio-Med Silesia publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies, Pluripotent Stem Cells Research, Body Contouring and Surgery and Global Health Care Issues.

  1. 1 Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1 works
  2. 2 Pluripotent Stem Cells Research Molecular Biology 1 works
  3. 3 Body Contouring and Surgery Surgery 1 works
  4. 4 Global Health Care Issues General Health Professions 0 works
  5. 5 SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research Infectious Diseases 0 works
  6. 6 3D Printing in Biomedical Research Biomedical Engineering 0 works
  7. 7 Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes Oral Surgery 0 works
  8. 8 Bone health and osteoporosis research Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 0 works
  9. 9 Dental Radiography and Imaging Oral Surgery 0 works
  10. 10 Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis Archeology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available24.1%not open75.9%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors7.8%domestic only92.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Kardio-Med Silesia's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 9% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Kardio-Med Silesia as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00012% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%0.0030%Kardio-Med Silesia0.000052% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Kardio-Med Silesia over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Zabrze

All research institutions in Zabrze

Share Kardio-Med Silesia's ranking

Kardio-Med Silesia on Science Explorer

A card with Kardio-Med Silesia's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Kardio-Med Silesia. Posts are plain text and can be reported.