Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Saint Paul · United States

Minnesota Project

In research, Minnesota Project stands highest in Social Sciences (#10,850 of 14,833 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#12,964 of 17,446 worldwide), over all time.

mnproject.orgROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022-now
#16,838
of 22,385 · #14,045 all time
Rank in United States
#2,442
of 3,332
Research works
457
▲ 71% vs 2018-21
Citations
6.5k
14.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
6.1%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.92×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
44%
world 40%
International
28%
world 18%
Minnesota Project

What is Minnesota Project known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #10,850 of 14,833 7.9%152
Physical SciencesDomain #12,964 of 17,446 4.6%180

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Minnesota Project sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Minnesota Project work in?

In 2022-now, 44% of research at Minnesota Project is in Physical Sciences, 38% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (20%), Computer Science (13%), Social Sciences (12%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 42 fractional works · 44.0% of its workEngineering: 19 fractional works · 19.8% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 4 fractional works · 3.9% of its workBuilding and Construction: 3 fractional works · 3.3% of its workMechanical Engineering: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workAerospace Engineering: 2 fractional works · 2.2% of its workComputational Mechanics: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workOcean Engineering: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 12 fractional works · 13.1% of its workInformation Systems: 5 fractional works · 4.9% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 2 fractional works · 2.0% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 2 fractional works · 1.8% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workComputer Science Applications: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHardware and Architecture: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 4 fractional works · 4.3% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workNuclear and High Energy Physics: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workRadiation: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 4 fractional works · 4.1% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMaterials Science: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSpace and Planetary Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 36 fractional works · 38.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 12 fractional works · 12.4% of its workSociology and Political Science: 3 fractional works · 2.9% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workLibrary and Information Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workCultural Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workUrban Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workLaw: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 9 fractional works · 9.2% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 3 fractional works · 2.7% of its workManagement Information Systems: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workMarketing: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBusiness and International Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 5 fractional works · 5.5% of its workHistory: 2 fractional works · 1.8% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 2 fractional works · 1.8% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workReligious studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychology: 4 fractional works · 4.2% of its workClinical Psychology: 2 fractional works · 2.0% of its workSocial Psychology: 2 fractional works · 1.9% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 3 fractional works · 3.5% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 3 fractional works · 2.9% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDecision Sciences: 3 fractional works · 3.2% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 3 fractional works · 3.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 12 fractional works · 12.3% of its workMedicine: 8 fractional works · 8.0% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHealth Informatics: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workHealth Professions: 3 fractional works · 2.9% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNursing: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 5 fractional works · 5.6% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 3 fractional works · 3.5% of its workForestry: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workFood Science: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSoil Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workALL ITS WORKMinnesota Project95fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences6%Physical Sciences44%Health Sciences12%Social Sciences38%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 24 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering1919.8%
    2. Computer Science1213.1%
    3. Physics and Astronomy44.3%
    4. Environmental Science44.1%
    5. Materials Science21.6%
    6. Earth and Planetary Sciences10.7%
    7. Energy00.2%
    8. Chemical Engineering00.2%
    9. Chemistry00.0%
    10. Mathematics00.0%
    1. Social Sciences1212.4%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting99.2%
    3. Arts and Humanities55.5%
    4. Psychology44.2%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance33.5%
    6. Decision Sciences33.2%
    1. Medicine88.0%
    2. Health Professions32.9%
    3. Nursing11.3%
    4. Dentistry00.1%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences33.5%
    2. Neuroscience11.1%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology11.0%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.74× its world share, 3 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.18× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.65× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceChemical Engineering: 0.50× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringChemistry: 0.02× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 1.68× its world share, 12 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.44× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 1.32× its world share, 19 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.82× its world share, 4 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.46× its world share, 2 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 1.93× its world share, 4 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 0.21× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.11× its world share, 3 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.42× its world share, 8 worksMedicineNursing: 2.62× its world share, 1 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 1.92× its world share, 5 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2.85× its world share, 9 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 3.33× its world share, 3 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.63× its world share, 3 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.37× its world share, 4 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.98× its world share, 12 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 3.3×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 24 fields, with their numbers
  1. Decision Sciences3.33×3 works
  2. Business, Management and Accounting2.85×9 works
  3. Nursing2.62×1 works
  4. Physics and Astronomy1.93×4 works
  5. Arts and Humanities1.92×5 works
  6. Computer Science1.68×12 works
  7. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.63×3 works
  8. Psychology1.37×4 works
  9. Engineering1.32×19 works
  10. Health Professions1.11×3 works
  11. Social Sciences0.98×12 works
  12. Environmental Science0.82×4 works
  13. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.74×3 works
  14. Neuroscience0.65×1 works
  15. Chemical Engineering0.50×0 works
  16. Materials Science0.46×2 works
  17. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.44×1 works
  18. Medicine0.42×8 works
  19. Energy0.27×0 works
  20. Dentistry0.21×0 works
  21. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.18×1 works
  22. Immunology and Microbiology0.04×0 works
  23. Mathematics0.03×0 works
  24. Chemistry0.02×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Minnesota Project?

Ranked on the quality score, Kuan-Hsin Lin, Barbara A. Bicksler and Jeremy Karrick lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Minnesota Project.

  1. 1 Kuan-Hsin Lin United States · #3,098,927 worldwide 0 citations · 16 works
  2. 2 Barbara A. Bicksler United States · #3,197,190 worldwide 200 citations · 42 works
  3. 3 Jeremy Karrick United States · #3,355,534 worldwide 0 citations · 27 works
  4. 4 Ewart Wooldridge United States · #3,991,290 worldwide 24 citations · 15 works
  5. 5 Franco Albini United States · #3,999,446 worldwide 6 citations · 15 works
  6. 6 Azadeh Shahshahani United States · #4,657,534 worldwide 24 citations · 19 works
  7. 7 Charles Herckis United States · #5,035,333 worldwide 52 citations · 23 works
All ranked researchers at Minnesota Project

What are the most cited papers from Minnesota Project?

The most cited paper from Minnesota Project is "An Analysis of a Short Self-Report Measure of Life Satisfaction: Correlation With Rater Judgments" (Vivian Wood, M. L. Wylie, B. Sheafor, 1969), with 592 citations. Next come "Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis—Supporting documentation" (436) and "Object-oriented systems analysis: modeling the world in data" (407).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 An Analysis of a Short Self-Report Measure of Life Satisfaction: Correlation With Rater Judgments Vivian Wood, M. L. Wylie, B. Sheafor · Journal of Gerontology Oct 1969 592
2 Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis—Supporting documentation Douglas W. Wong, Steven D. Wexner, Ann C. Lowry et al. · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum Mar 2000 436
3 Object-oriented systems analysis: modeling the world in data Sally Shlaer, Stephen J. Mellor · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) 1985 407
4 Effects of legislation restricting pack sizes of paracetamol and salicylate on self poisoning in the United Kingdom: before and after study Keith Hawton, Ellen Townsend, Jonathan Deeks et al. · BMJ Open access 19 May 2001 384
5 The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development Kathleen Astin Knafl, Janet A. Deatrick, Agatha M. Gallo et al. · Research in Nursing & Health 22 Mar 2007 347
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Minnesota Project?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Risk Management, Supply Chain Management, Big Data, Sustainability, Entrepreneurship, Healthcare, Turbulence and Innovation.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Sustainability6▲ 2.5×20 topics
  2. Machine Learning5▲ 1.58×11 topics
  3. Risk Management4▲ 9.9×6 topics
  4. Supply Chain Management4▲ 5.3×8 topics
  5. Big Data4▲ 4.6×7 topics
  6. Healthcare4▲ 3.6×9 topics
  7. Innovation4▲ 3.6×14 topics
  8. Artificial Intelligence3▲ 2.5×9 topics
  9. Globalization3▲ 1.72×14 topics
  10. Entrepreneurship3▲ 7.7×9 topics
  11. Sustainable Development3▲ 1.89×12 topics
  12. Turbulence3▲ 30×3 topics
  13. Social Capital2▲ 4.9×6 topics
  14. Numerical Simulation2▲ 8.4×3 topics
  15. Technology2▲ 4.6×6 topics
  16. Optimization2▲ 5.2×3 topics
  17. Construction2▲ 14×2 topics
  18. Participatory Design2▲ 34×2 topics
  19. Open Innovation2▲ 29×2 topics
  20. BIM2▲ 26×1 topic
  21. Efficiency2▲ 5.3×2 topics
  22. Prefabrication2▲ 26×1 topic
  23. Boundary Layer1▲ 12×2 topics
  24. Pipeline1▲ 14×2 topics
  25. Public Sector Innovation1▲ 60×1 topic
  26. User-Centric Design1▲ 60×1 topic
  27. CFD Simulations1▲ 99×1 topic
  28. Decolonization1▲ 17×2 topics
  29. Fluid Dynamics1▲ 9.9×1 topic
  30. Lifestyle1▲ 47×3 topics
  31. Mechanics1▲ 84×1 topic
  32. Psychology1▲ 11×3 topics
  33. Ship Maneuvering1▲ 99×1 topic
  34. Affordances1▲ 49×2 topics
  35. Analytics1▲ 15×1 topic
  36. Business Intelligence1▲ 15×1 topic
  37. Complexity Theory1▲ 21×2 topics
  38. Construction Projects1▲ 29×2 topics
  39. Information Security1▲ 13×3 topics
  40. Market Structure1▲ 18×2 topics

Which research topics does Minnesota Project publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: BIM and Construction Integration, Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development, Big Data and Business Intelligence and Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability.

BIM and Construction Int…2BIM and Construction Integration: 2 fractional worksInnovative Approaches in…1Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development: 1 fractional worksBig Data and Business Intelligence: 1 fractional worksShip Hydrodynamics and M…1Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability: 1 fractional worksFluid dynamics and aerod…1Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies: 1 fractional worksEthics and Social Impacts of AI: 1 fractional worksEvaluation and Performance Assessment: 1 fractional worksLibrary Science and Admi…1Library Science and Administration: 1 fractional worksConstruction Project Management and Performance: 1 fractional worksFamily Business Performance and Succession: 1 fractional works
Building and ConstructionManagement of Technology and InnovationManagement Information SystemsOcean Engineering5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 BIM and Construction Integration Building and Construction 2 works
  2. 2 Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development Management of Technology and Innovation 1 works
  3. 3 Big Data and Business Intelligence Management Information Systems 1 works
  4. 4 Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability Ocean Engineering 1 works
  5. 5 Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies Computational Mechanics 1 works
  6. 6 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 1 works
  7. 7 Evaluation and Performance Assessment Management Science and Operations Research 1 works
  8. 8 Library Science and Administration Library and Information Sciences 1 works
  9. 9 Construction Project Management and Performance Management Science and Operations Research 1 works
  10. 10 Family Business Performance and Succession Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available44.4%not open55.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors27.5%domestic only72.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Minnesota Project's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 71% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Minnesota Project as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00044% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%0.0030%Minnesota Project0.00049% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Minnesota Project over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Saint Paul

All research institutions in Saint Paul

Share Minnesota Project's ranking

Minnesota Project on Science Explorer

A card with Minnesota Project's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Minnesota Project. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.