Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Saint Paul · United States

Minnesota Project

In research, Minnesota Project stands highest in Social Sciences (#14,156 of 16,945 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#19,094 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time.

mnproject.orgROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022–2025
#25,192
of 28,054 · #24,707 all time
Rank in United States
#3,796
of 4,192
Research works
457
▼ 16% vs 2013–17
Citations
6.5k
14.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.1%
record average 16.5%
Open access
44%
world 28%

What is Minnesota Project known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #14,156 of 16,945 18.2%152
Physical SciencesDomain #19,094 of 21,541 8.1%180

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Minnesota Project sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.44× its world share, 2 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.20× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.40× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceChemical Engineering: 0.62× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringComputer Science: 1.63× its world share, 10 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.46× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.33× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 1.20× its world share, 14 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.78× its world share, 3 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.50× its world share, 1 worksMaterials SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 1.28× its world share, 2 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 0.26× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.25× its world share, 3 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.43× its world share, 6 worksMedicineNursing: 3.23× its world share, 1 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 2.29× its world share, 5 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 3.44× its world share, 9 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 3.83× its world share, 3 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.98× its world share, 3 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.48× its world share, 4 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.98× its world share, 10 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 3.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Minnesota Project?

Ranked on the composite score, Pat Niessner Palmer and Ida Persson lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Minnesota Project.

  1. 1 Pat Niessner Palmer United States · #891,370 worldwide 3 citations · 32 works
  2. 2 Ida Persson United States · #1,072,382 worldwide 0 citations · 20 works
All ranked researchers at Minnesota Project

Which keywords describe research at Minnesota Project?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Risk Management, Supply Chain Management, Big Data, Healthcare, Entrepreneurship, Sustainability, Innovation and Machine Learning.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Sustainability5▲ 2.5×12 topics
  2. Machine Learning4▲ 1.79×11 topics
  3. Risk Management4▲ 12×6 topics
  4. Supply Chain Management4▲ 6.2×8 topics
  5. Healthcare4▲ 4.4×9 topics
  6. Big Data4▲ 5.3×7 topics
  7. Innovation3▲ 4.2×12 topics
  8. Globalization3▲ 2.1×13 topics
  9. Artificial Intelligence3▲ 2.7×9 topics
  10. Sustainable Development3▲ 2.2×11 topics
  11. Entrepreneurship3▲ 8.9×7 topics
  12. Technology2▲ 5.6×6 topics
  13. Optimization2▲ 6.1×3 topics
  14. Social Capital2▲ 5.5×5 topics
  15. Construction2▲ 17×2 topics
  16. Literature2▲ 4.0×5 topics
  17. Participatory Design2▲ 44×2 topics
  18. Digital Transformation2▲ 4.0×6 topics
  19. Open Innovation2▲ 34×2 topics
  20. BIM2▲ 31×1 topic
  21. Efficiency2▲ 6.4×2 topics
  22. Prefabrication2▲ 31×1 topic
  23. Pipeline1▲ 16×2 topics
  24. Public Sector Innovation1▲ 72×1 topic
  25. User-Centric Design1▲ 72×1 topic
  26. Decolonization1▲ 21×2 topics
  27. Lifestyle1▲ 52×3 topics
  28. Psychology1▲ 13×3 topics
  29. Affordances1▲ 79×2 topics
  30. Analytics1▲ 17×1 topic
  31. Big Data Analytics1▲ 7.0×3 topics
  32. Business Intelligence1▲ 17×1 topic
  33. Complexity Theory1▲ 30×2 topics
  34. Construction Projects1▲ 35×2 topics
  35. Information Security1▲ 17×3 topics
  36. Market Structure1▲ 20×2 topics
  37. Trauma1▲ 7.5×3 topics
  38. Citizen Participation1▲ 11×2 topics
  39. Internationalization1▲ 23×2 topics
  40. NGOs1▲ 14×2 topics

Which research topics does Minnesota Project publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: BIM and Construction Integration, Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development, Big Data and Business Intelligence and Insurance and Financial Risk Management.

BIM and Construction Int…2BIM and Construction Integration: 2 fractional worksInnovative Approaches in…1Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development: 1 fractional worksBig Data and Business Intelligence: 1 fractional worksInsurance and Financial Risk Management: 1 fractional worksCOVID-19 and Mental Health: 1 fractional worksBlockchain Technology Applications and Security: 1 fractional worksHistorical and Contemporary Political Dynamics: 1 fractional worksFamily Business Performa…1Family Business Performance and Succession: 1 fractional worksEvaluation and Performance Assessment: 1 fractional worksFrench Urban and Social Studies: 1 fractional works
Building and ConstructionManagement of Technology and InnovationManagement Information SystemsEconomics and Econometrics6 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 BIM and Construction Integration Building and Construction 2 works
  2. 2 Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development Management of Technology and Innovation 1 works
  3. 3 Big Data and Business Intelligence Management Information Systems 1 works
  4. 4 Insurance and Financial Risk Management Economics and Econometrics 1 works
  5. 5 COVID-19 and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 1 works
  6. 6 Blockchain Technology Applications and Security Information Systems 1 works
  7. 7 Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics History 1 works
  8. 8 Family Business Performance and Succession Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1 works
  9. 9 Evaluation and Performance Assessment Management Science and Operations Research 1 works
  10. 10 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available44.4%not open55.6%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors27.5%domestic only72.5%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Minnesota Project's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 16% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Saint Paul

All research institutions in Saint Paul

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.