Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · San Diego · United States

NanoCellect Biomedical (United States)

nanocellect.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
12
▲ 54% vs 2018-21
Citations
156
12.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
5.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
57%
world 40%
International
22%
world 18%
NanoCellect Biomedical (United States)

Not ranked overall: NanoCellect Biomedical (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does NanoCellect Biomedical (United States) work in?

In all years, 44% of research at NanoCellect Biomedical (United States) is in Life Sciences, 44% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (41%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (38%), Medicine (12%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Life Sciences: 5 fractional works · 44.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 5 fractional works · 38.2% of its workMolecular Biology: 3 fractional works · 26.3% of its workBiophysics: 1 fractional works · 8.4% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 5.9% of its workImmunology: 1 fractional works · 5.9% of its workPhysical Sciences: 5 fractional works · 43.8% of its workEngineering: 5 fractional works · 40.9% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 5 fractional works · 38.9% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Sciences: 2 fractional works · 12.1% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 12.1% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 8.1% of its workImmunology and Allergy: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKNanoCellectBiomedical…12fractional works, all years
Life Sciences44%Physical Sciences44%Health Sciences12%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 3 domains and 7 fields, with their numbers
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology538.2%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology15.9%
    1. Engineering540.9%
    2. Computer Science01.4%
    3. Physics and Astronomy00.9%
    4. Materials Science00.6%
    1. Medicine212.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Who are the top researchers at NanoCellect Biomedical (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, José M. Morachis lead among researchers whose main affiliation is NanoCellect Biomedical (United States).

  1. 1 José M. Morachis United States · #1,180,720 worldwide 863 citations · 18 works
All ranked researchers at NanoCellect Biomedical (United States)

What are the most cited papers from NanoCellect Biomedical (United States)?

The most cited paper from NanoCellect Biomedical (United States) is "The systemic delivery of siRNAs by a cell penetrating peptide, low molecular weight protamine" (Young-Suk Choi, Jue Yeon Lee, Jin Sook Suh et al., 2009), with 128 citations. Next come "Universally applicable three-dimensional hydrodynamic microfluidic flow focusing" (94) and "Cameraless high-throughput three-dimensional imaging flow cytometry" (41).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The systemic delivery of siRNAs by a cell penetrating peptide, low molecular weight protamine Young-Suk Choi, Jue Yeon Lee, Jin Sook Suh et al. · Biomaterials 2 Dec 2009 128
2 Universally applicable three-dimensional hydrodynamic microfluidic flow focusing Yu‐Jui Chiu, Sung Hwan Cho, Zhe Mei et al. · Lab on a Chip Open access 2013 94
3 Cameraless high-throughput three-dimensional imaging flow cytometry Yuanyuan Han, Rui Hua Tang, Yi Gu et al. · Optica Open access 26 Sep 2019 41
4 Low-latency label-free image-activated cell sorting using fast deep learning and AI inferencing Rui Hua Tang, Lin Xia, Bien Gutierrez et al. · Biosensors and Bioelectronics Open access 7 Nov 2022 34
5 Image-guided cell sorting using fast scanning lasers Xinyu Chen, Yi Gu, Jiajie Chen et al. · APL Photonics Open access Apr 2020 26
All 19 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does NanoCellect Biomedical (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies, Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, CAR-T cell therapy research and Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation.

Microfluidic and Bio-sen…2Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies: 2 fractional worksSingle-cell and spatial …1Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics: 1 fractional worksCAR-T cell therapy research: 1 fractional worksInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation: 1 fractional worksCell Image Analysis Techniques: 0 fractional worksCancer Genomics and Diagnostics: 0 fractional worksViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects: 0 fractional works3D Printing in Biomedical Research: 0 fractional worksMolecular Communication and Nanonetworks: 0 fractional worksCRISPR and Genetic Engineering: 0 fractional works
Biomedical EngineeringMolecular BiologyOncologyBiophysics1 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies Biomedical Engineering 2 works
  2. 2 Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics Molecular Biology 1 works
  3. 3 CAR-T cell therapy research Oncology 1 works
  4. 4 Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation Biomedical Engineering 1 works
  5. 5 Cell Image Analysis Techniques Biophysics 0 works
  6. 6 Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics Cancer Research 0 works
  7. 7 Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects Molecular Biology 0 works
  8. 8 3D Printing in Biomedical Research Biomedical Engineering 0 works
  9. 9 Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks Biomedical Engineering 0 works
  10. 10 CRISPR and Genetic Engineering Molecular Biology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available57.3%not open42.7%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors21.7%domestic only78.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has NanoCellect Biomedical (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 54% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting2010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is NanoCellect Biomedical (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000018% in 2024.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%NanoCellect Biomedical (United States)0.000014% in 202520102020

Fractional works of NanoCellect Biomedical (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in San Diego

All research institutions in San Diego

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about NanoCellect Biomedical (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.