Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation is a research topic within Biomedical Engineering. Science Explorer counts 41k research works in it since 1950. 19.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the advances in droplet microfluidics technology, including topics such as continuous flow chemistry, digital PCR, high-throughput screening, emulsion generation, microreactor technology, single-cell analysis, chemical synthesis, and biomedical applications.
- Microfluidics
- Droplet Formation
- Continuous Flow Chemistry
- Digital PCR
- High-Throughput Screening
- Emulsion Generation
- Microreactor Technology
- Single-Cell Analysis
- Chemical Synthesis
- Biomedical Applications
- Research works
- 41k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 8.1k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 19.5% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +23% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation research?
By volume, China and the United States publish the most (2.2k and 1.1k works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 China 2.2k works
- 2 United States 1.1k works
- 3 India 610 works
- 4 Germany 406 works
- 5 Japan 369 works
- 6 United Kingdom 317 works
- 7 France 265 works
- 8 South Korea 228 works
- 9 Italy 185 works
- 10 Iran 168 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Tsinghua University publishes the most Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation research, followed by State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering and Tianjin University.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Tsinghua UniversityChina 71 works
- 2 State Key Laboratory of Chemical EngineeringChina 51 works
- 3 Tianjin UniversityChina 47 works
- 4 Chinese Academy of SciencesChina 40 works
- 5 Zhejiang UniversityChina 39 works
- 6 Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityChina 37 works
- 7 Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFrance 37 works
- 8 East China University of Science and TechnologyChina 36 works
- 9 Nanjing Tech UniversityChina 34 works
- 10 The University of TokyoJapan 31 works
Who are the leading researchers in Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation include George M. Whitesides, Krzysztof Matyjaszewski and Róbert Langer.
- 1 George M. Whitesides United States 4.8k citations
- 2 Krzysztof Matyjaszewski United States 4.4k citations
- 3 Róbert Langer United States 4.2k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation research done?
The largest centres of Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Hangzhou (China) and Nanjing (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Rahway, Graz and Karlsruhe.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- RahwayUS · 21.2 works32×
- GrazAT · 30.2 works6.1×
- KarlsruheDE · 29.0 works4.9×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation?
Among universities, judged by research, Nanjing Tech University, Sharif University of Technology and ETH Zurich score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nanjing Tech UniversityChina | 49.2 | 14.8% | 8.9× | 34 | +41.5% |
| 2 | Sharif University of TechnologyIran | 49.1 | 10.1% | 11.0× | 17 | +106.2% |
| 3 | ETH ZurichSwitzerland | 47.4 | 24.8% | 5.2× | 27 | +36.1% |
| 4 | Pohang University of Science and TechnologySouth Korea | 46.3 | 21.6% | 9.2× | 15 | +18.8% |
| 5 | Tsinghua UniversityChina | 45.7 | 13.8% | 4.7× | 71 | +51.7% |
| 6 | East China University of Science and TechnologyChina | 45.5 | 10.5% | 9.3× | 36 | -7.2% |
| 7 | Iran University of Science and TechnologyIran | 45.5 | 16.3% | 6.5× | 14 | +382.8% |
| 8 | Carnegie Mellon UniversityUnited States | 40.4 | 58.9% | 2.6× | 8 | -7.8% |
| 9 | Purdue University West LafayetteUnited States | 40.3 | 26.6% | 3.4× | 25 | +73.1% |
| 10 | Loughborough UniversityUnited Kingdom | 40.3 | 28.2% | 5.1× | 9 | +87.0% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 23% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.