Oxfam
In research, Oxfam stands highest in Social Sciences (#8,195 of 9,585 worldwide), 2022-now.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #9,593 of 22,385 · #1,201 all time
- Rank in United Kingdom
- #319 of 862
- Research works
- 1.4k ▼ 36% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 31k 21.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 11.6% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.28× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 33% world 40%
- International
- 24% world 18%
What is Oxfam known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #8,195 of 9,585 | 8.7% | 72 | #856 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Oxfam sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Oxfam work in?
In 2022-now, 50% of research at Oxfam is in Social Sciences, 22% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (31%), Health Professions (11%), Medicine (10%). It does 1.9× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 24 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences7749.5%
- Social Sciences4931.4%
- Arts and Humanities117.1%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance63.8%
- Business, Management and Accounting63.7%
- Psychology42.6%
- Decision Sciences10.9%
- Health Sciences3422.1%
- Health Professions1711.0%
- Medicine1610.2%
- Nursing10.9%
- Physical Sciences2918.5%
- Engineering95.8%
- Environmental Science64.1%
- Computer Science42.6%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences31.7%
- Physics and Astronomy31.6%
- Chemistry21.0%
- Materials Science21.0%
- Mathematics00.3%
- Energy00.2%
- Chemical Engineering00.1%
- Life Sciences159.9%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 4.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 24 fields, with their numbers
- Health Professions4.16×17 works
- Social Sciences2.48×49 works
- Arts and Humanities2.46×11 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics2.01×1 works
- Nursing1.86×1 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.75×6 works
- Business, Management and Accounting1.16×6 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences1.08×3 works
- Decision Sciences0.96×2 works
- Psychology0.84×4 works
- Environmental Science0.82×6 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.80×6 works
- Neuroscience0.79×2 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.73×2 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.71×6 works
- Chemistry0.64×2 works
- Medicine0.53×16 works
- Engineering0.39×9 works
- Computer Science0.34×4 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.32×0 works
- Chemical Engineering0.31×0 works
- Materials Science0.28×2 works
- Energy0.27×0 works
- Mathematics0.25×0 works
- Health Professions 4.2×
- Social Sciences 2.5×
- Arts and Humanities 2.5×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 2.0×
- Nursing 1.9×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.8×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.1×
- Decision Sciences 1.0×
- Psychology 0.8×
- Environmental Science 0.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.8×
- Neuroscience 0.8×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.7×
- Chemistry 0.6×
- Medicine 0.5×
- Engineering 0.4×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.3×
- Chemical Engineering 0.3×
- Materials Science 0.3×
- Energy 0.3×
- Mathematics 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at Oxfam?
Ranked on the quality score, Caroline Sweetman, Ruth Mayne and Mackenzie E. C. Walcott lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Oxfam.
- 1
Caroline Sweetman
United Kingdom · #607,747 worldwide 2.4k citations · 154 works
- 2
Ruth Mayne
United Kingdom · #1,387,033 worldwide 940 citations · 34 works
- 3
Mackenzie E. C. Walcott
United Kingdom · #1,528,294 worldwide 9 citations · 358 works
- 4
Deborah Eade
United Kingdom · #1,679,880 worldwide 2.5k citations · 172 works
- 5
Jo Rowlands
United Kingdom · #1,746,762 worldwide 2.3k citations · 36 works
- 6
Hermentrude
United Kingdom · #1,989,272 worldwide 6 citations · 545 works
- 7
Luis Correia Da Silva
United Kingdom · #2,020,231 worldwide 312 citations · 41 works
- 8
James H. Kavanagh
United Kingdom · #2,072,715 worldwide 393 citations · 40 works
- 9
Lovell Drage
United Kingdom · #2,174,404 worldwide 140 citations · 57 works
- 10
John R. Magrath
United Kingdom · #2,201,983 worldwide 419 citations · 151 works
Which keywords describe research at Oxfam?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Quality Improvement, Human Rights, Primary Care, Globalization, Health System Reform, Chronic Disease Management, Continuity of Care and Patient-Centered Medical Home.
- Archaeology
- Economic Crisis
- Unemployment
- Atlantic History
- Health Outcomes
- Development Policies
- Neuroscience
- Development
- Occupation
- Gender Inequality
- Poverty Reduction
- NGOs
- Governance
- Economic Growth
- Labor Market
- Education
- Patient-Centered Medical Home
- Chronic Disease Management
- Primary Care
- Quality Improvement
- Globalization
- Human Rights
- Health System Reform
- Continuity of Care
- Public Health
- Gender
- Mental Health
- Economic Development
- Neoliberalism
- Nationalism
- Patient Satisfaction
- Metaphysics
- Colonialism
- Cultural Studies
- Social Determinants of Health
- Foreign Aid
- Price Discrimination
- Transatlantic Slave Trade
- Decolonization
- Precarious Employment
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization10▲ 3.1×25 topics
- Quality Improvement9▲ 29×3 topics
- Human Rights8▲ 5.3×16 topics
- Primary Care7▲ 12×7 topics
- Health System Reform6▲ 57×2 topics
- Chronic Disease Management6▲ 18×2 topics
- Continuity of Care6▲ 75×1 topic
- Patient-Centered Medical Home6▲ 105×1 topic
- Public Health6▲ 2.4×17 topics
- Education5▲ 1.83×16 topics
- Gender5▲ 5.6×12 topics
- Labor Market4▲ 9.9×8 topics
- Mental Health4▲ 1.93×10 topics
- Economic Growth4▲ 3.2×9 topics
- Economic Development4▲ 3.2×9 topics
- Governance4▲ 7.9×6 topics
- Neoliberalism4▲ 7.1×12 topics
- NGOs4▲ 27×3 topics
- Nationalism4▲ 5.2×8 topics
- Poverty Reduction4▲ 18×4 topics
- Patient Satisfaction3▲ 6.5×2 topics
- Gender Inequality3▲ 14×6 topics
- Metaphysics3▲ 45×2 topics
- Occupation3▲ 31×2 topics
- Colonialism3▲ 3.9×7 topics
- Development3▲ 5.3×9 topics
- Cultural Studies3▲ 4.9×3 topics
- Neuroscience3▲ 5.7×5 topics
- Social Determinants of Health3▲ 7.7×3 topics
- Development Policies2▲ 46×1 topic
- Foreign Aid2▲ 46×1 topic
- Health Outcomes2▲ 5.8×3 topics
- Price Discrimination2▲ 42×2 topics
- Atlantic History2▲ 97×1 topic
- Transatlantic Slave Trade2▲ 97×1 topic
- Unemployment2▲ 19×2 topics
- Decolonization2▲ 18×3 topics
- Economic Crisis2▲ 12×1 topic
- Precarious Employment2▲ 24×1 topic
- Archaeology2▲ 11×4 topics
Which research topics does Oxfam publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Primary Care and Health Outcomes, International Development and Aid, Colonialism, slavery, and trade and Employment and Welfare Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Primary Care and Health Outcomes General Health Professions 6 works
- 2 International Development and Aid Development 2 works
- 3 Colonialism, slavery, and trade Anthropology 2 works
- 4 Employment and Welfare Studies General Health Professions 2 works
- 5 Classical Philosophy and Thought Philosophy 2 works
- 6 European history and politics Political Science and International Relations 2 works
- 7 Healthcare Quality and Management Health Information Management 2 works
- 8 Empathy and Medical Education Psychiatry and Mental health 2 works
- 9 Healthcare cost, quality, practices General Health Professions 2 works
- 10 Merger and Competition Analysis Economics and Econometrics 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Oxfam's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 36% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Oxfam as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00078% in 2024.
Fractional works of Oxfam over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 18.9% in 2008.
Other research institutions in Oxford
- University of Oxford
- Science Oxford
- Oxford Brookes University
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre
- Genomics (United Kingdom)
- Oxford Archaeology
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Oxfam. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
