- World rank, all time
- #26,937 of 34,923
- Rank in Eswatini
- #2 of 2
- Research works
- 138 ▼ 55% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 2.5k 17.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 6.8% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.03× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 42% world 40%
- International
- 40% world 18%
Which fields of science does Swaziland National Trust Commission work in?
In all years, 33% of research at Swaziland National Trust Commission is in Health Sciences, 30% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (24%), Environmental Science (18%), Social Sciences (13%). It does 1.4× the world's share of Health Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 25 fields, with their numbers
- Health Sciences4633.0%
- Medicine3323.9%
- Health Professions107.3%
- Nursing21.3%
- Veterinary00.2%
- Dentistry00.1%
- Physical Sciences4129.9%
- Environmental Science2417.7%
- Engineering118.1%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences21.4%
- Computer Science10.9%
- Physics and Astronomy10.6%
- Chemistry10.6%
- Energy00.2%
- Materials Science00.2%
- Mathematics00.1%
- Social Sciences3323.9%
- Life Sciences1813.2%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 5.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 17 fields, with their numbers
- Health Professions5.40×2 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance4.17×1 works
- Environmental Science3.02×2 works
- Business, Management and Accounting2.24×1 works
- Arts and Humanities1.76×1 works
- Psychology1.74×1 works
- Social Sciences1.12×2 works
- Medicine1.01×2 works
- Chemistry0.92×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.78×0 works
- Computer Science0.37×0 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.37×0 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.26×0 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.23×0 works
- Materials Science0.21×0 works
- Engineering0.10×0 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.09×0 works
- Health Professions 5.4×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4.2×
- Environmental Science 3.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting 2.2×
- Arts and Humanities 1.8×
- Psychology 1.7×
- Social Sciences 1.1×
- Medicine 1.0×
- Chemistry 0.9×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.8×
- Computer Science 0.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.4×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Swaziland National Trust Commission?
Ranked on the quality score, David Price Williams, Roland R. Berger and RICHARD C. BOYCOTT lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Swaziland National Trust Commission.
- 1
David Price Williams
Eswatini · #2,341,431 worldwide 226 citations · 15 works
- 2
Roland R. Berger
Eswatini · #5,033,700 worldwide 69 citations · 29 works
- 3
RICHARD C. BOYCOTT
Eswatini · #5,248,922 worldwide 247 citations · 40 works
Which keywords describe research at Swaziland National Trust Commission?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Antiretroviral Therapy, HIV Prevention, Population Dynamics, Mortality Rates, HIV Transmission, Preexposure Prophylaxis and Stigma and Discrimination.
- Poverty Reduction
- Child Mortality
- Health Inequalities
- Maternal Mortality
- Vaccine
- Impact
- Habitat Fragmentation
- Genetic Diversity
- Invasive Species
- Development
- Economic Growth
- Sexual Behavior
- Social Determinants of Health
- Conservation
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Preexposure Prophylaxis
- Biodiversity
- Mortality Rates
- HIV Prevention
- Epidemiology
- Climate Change
- Antiretroviral Therapy
- Population Dynamics
- Risk Factors
- HIV Transmission
- Stigma and Discrimination
- Adolescent Health
- Remote Sensing
- HIV/AIDS
- Youth Risk Behavior
- South Africa
- Healthcare
- Poverty
- Conservation Biology
- Global Change
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Land Use Change
- Habitat Selection
- Model Evaluation
- Health Systems
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change19▲ 5.1×37 topics
- Epidemiology9▲ 1.57×32 topics
- Antiretroviral Therapy7▲ 21×6 topics
- HIV Prevention7▲ 72×2 topics
- Population Dynamics6▲ 15×8 topics
- Mortality Rates6▲ 45×2 topics
- Risk Factors6▲ 4.1×6 topics
- Biodiversity6▲ 5.6×12 topics
- HIV Transmission6▲ 47×2 topics
- Preexposure Prophylaxis5▲ 71×1 topic
- Stigma and Discrimination5▲ 71×1 topic
- Biodiversity Conservation5▲ 13×5 topics
- Adolescent Health5▲ 42×2 topics
- Conservation5▲ 7.3×9 topics
- Remote Sensing5▲ 3.2×8 topics
- Social Determinants of Health5▲ 15×2 topics
- HIV/AIDS5▲ 47×2 topics
- Sexual Behavior5▲ 84×1 topic
- Youth Risk Behavior5▲ 84×1 topic
- Economic Growth4▲ 4.4×7 topics
- South Africa4▲ 107×2 topics
- Development4▲ 9.0×3 topics
- Healthcare4▲ 4.2×3 topics
- Invasive Species4▲ 5.1×11 topics
- Poverty4▲ 39×2 topics
- Genetic Diversity4▲ 5.8×8 topics
- Conservation Biology4▲ 25×2 topics
- Habitat Fragmentation4▲ 8.6×4 topics
- Global Change3▲ 8.1×4 topics
- Impact3▲ 105×1 topic
- Sub-Saharan Africa3▲ 175×1 topic
- Vaccine3▲ 5.8×7 topics
- Land Use Change3▲ 7.1×3 topics
- Maternal Mortality3▲ 11×3 topics
- Habitat Selection3▲ 21×2 topics
- Health Inequalities3▲ 19×2 topics
- Model Evaluation3▲ 18×2 topics
- Child Mortality3▲ 33×1 topic
- Health Systems3▲ 33×1 topic
- Poverty Reduction2▲ 17×2 topics
Which research topics does Swaziland National Trust Commission publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Teacher Education and Leadership Studies, Business and Economic Development, Environmental Sustainability in Business and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Teacher Education and Leadership Studies Education 1 works
- 2 Business and Economic Development Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
- 3 Environmental Sustainability in Business Marketing 0 works
- 4 Global Cancer Incidence and Screening Oncology 0 works
- 5 Methodologies in Health Research and Practice Health Information Management 0 works
- 6 Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity Philosophy 0 works
- 7 Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues General Health Professions 0 works
- 8 Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction General Health Professions 0 works
- 9 Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecology 0 works
- 10 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Swaziland National Trust Commission's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 55% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Swaziland National Trust Commission as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000029% in 2024.
Fractional works of Swaziland National Trust Commission over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Swaziland National Trust Commission. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
