Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Body Composition Measurement Techniques is a research topic within Physiology. Science Explorer counts 27k research works in it since 1950. 13.6% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the assessment and analysis of body composition, including methods such as bioelectrical impedance analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and anthropometry. It covers topics related to clinical practice, obesity, muscle mass, and nutritional assessment in various populations.
- Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
- Body Mass Index
- Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry
- Body Fat Percentage
- Segmental Body Composition
- Clinical Practice
- Obesity
- Muscle Mass
- Nutritional Assessment
- Adiposity
- Research works
- 27k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 3.6k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 13.6% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +40% the tick is no change
This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.
Which countries lead Body Composition Measurement Techniques research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (769 and 636 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 769 works
- 2 China 636 works
- 3 Brazil 334 works
- 4 Japan 316 works
- 5 India 291 works
- 6 Spain 221 works
- 7 South Korea 199 works
- 8 Türkiye 183 works
- 9 Italy 167 works
- 10 United Kingdom 163 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Body Composition Measurement Techniques research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Universidade de São Paulo publishes the most Body Composition Measurement Techniques research, followed by University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Hacettepe University.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Universidade de São PauloBrazil 18 works
- 2 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States 17 works
- 3 Hacettepe UniversityTürkiye 17 works
- 4 Sichuan UniversityChina 15 works
- 5 Yonsei UniversitySouth Korea 12 works
- 6 Sağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiTürkiye 12 works
- 7 West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChina 12 works
- 8 Texas Tech UniversityUnited States 11 works
- 9 Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Brazil 10 works
- 10 Yeungnam UniversitySouth Korea 10 works
Who are the leading researchers in Body Composition Measurement Techniques?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Body Composition Measurement Techniques include Cyrus Cooper, George Davey Smith and Ruth J. F. Loos.
- 1 Cyrus Cooper United Kingdom 7.2k citations
- 2 George Davey Smith United Kingdom 4.9k citations
- 3 Ruth J. F. Loos United States 3.6k citations
- 4 Diego Augusto Santos Silva Brazil 3.5k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Body Composition Measurement Techniques research done?
The largest centres of Body Composition Measurement Techniques research in 2022–2025 are Seoul (South Korea), Beijing (China), Tokyo (Japan) and Shanghai (China).
Where is the best place to study Body Composition Measurement Techniques?
Among universities, judged by research, Texas Tech University, Sichuan University and Yeungnam University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas Tech UniversityUnited States | 57.8 | 27.2% | 5.2× | 11 | +279.6% |
| 2 | Sichuan UniversityChina | 56.4 | 34.5% | 1.7× | 15 | +130.1% |
| 3 | Yeungnam UniversitySouth Korea | 54.0 | 19.7% | 9.2× | 10 | -60.0% |
| 4 | Hacettepe UniversityTürkiye | 53.4 | 8.2% | 6.7× | 17 | +154.4% |
| 5 | Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina | 50.4 | 35.7% | 1.9× | 9 | +513.3% |
| 6 | Yonsei UniversitySouth Korea | 50.0 | 19.2% | 3.3× | 12 | +192.4% |
| 7 | University of AlbertaCanada | 45.3 | 29.9% | 2.1× | 9 | +96.4% |
| 8 | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteBrazil | 42.8 | 19.4% | 4.8× | 9 | +156.3% |
| 9 | University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States | 41.0 | 5.7% | 2.1× | 18 | +270.5% |
| 10 | Capital Medical UniversityChina | 39.5 | 33.6% | 3.3× | 9 | -32.6% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Body Composition Measurement Techniques research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 40% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Body Composition Measurement Techniques.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.