Biochemical effects in animals
Biochemical effects in animals is a research topic within Physiology. Science Explorer counts 40k research works in it since 1950. 9.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the physiology and pathophysiology of carnosine, a dipeptide with antioxidant and neuroprotective properties. It covers topics such as the effects of ß-alanine supplementation on muscle carnosine, its role in diabetic nephropathy, exercise performance, and its potential in mitigating oxidative stress and aging-related processes.
- Carnosine
- ß-Alanine Supplementation
- Muscle Carnosine
- Antioxidant
- Neuroprotection
- Diabetic Nephropathy
- Exercise Performance
- Histidine Dipeptides
- Aging
- Oxidative Stress
- Research works
- 40k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 3.9k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 9.9% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
- +17% the tick is no change
- Largest producer
China
37% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.
Which countries lead Biochemical effects in animals research?
By volume, China and the United States publish the most (1.3k and 533 works in 2022-now).
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
China 1.3k works
- 2
United States 533 works
- 3
Russia 415 works
- 4
India 313 works
- 5
Iran 211 works
- 6
Japan 207 works
- 7
Türkiye 165 works
- 8
South Korea 145 works
- 9
Brazil 144 works
- 10
Egypt 130 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Biochemical effects in animals research?
By volume in 2022-now, Russian Academy of Sciences publishes the most Biochemical effects in animals research, followed by Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and Islamic Azad University, Tehran.
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
Russian Academy of Sciences
Russia 117 works
- 2
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
China 45 works
- 3
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
Iran 38 works
- 4
Northeast Agricultural University
China 26 works
- 5
Dalian Polytechnic University
China 24 works
- 6
Chinese Academy of Sciences
China 22 works
- 7
China Agricultural University
China 22 works
- 8
Nanchang University
China 22 works
- 9
Nanjing Agricultural University
China 22 works
- 10
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs
China 20 works
Who are the leading researchers in Biochemical effects in animals?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Biochemical effects in animals include George Davey Smith, Walter Churchill Willett and Jun Wang.
- 1
George Davey Smith
United Kingdom 435k citations
- 2
Walter Churchill Willett
United States 411k citations
- 3
Jun Wang
China 340k citations
- 4
Róbert Langer
United States 303k citations
- 5
Luigi Ferrucci
United States 281k citations
- 6
JoAnn E. Manson
United States 263k citations
- 7
Amirhossein Sahebkar
Iran 258k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Biochemical effects in animals research done?
The largest centres of Biochemical effects in animals research in 2022-now are Beijing (China), Moscow (Russia), Guangzhou (China) and Tehran (Iran).
Where is the best place to study Biochemical effects in animals?
Among universities, judged by research, Northeast Agricultural University, Beijing Technology and Business University and China Agricultural University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.
Every institution in Biochemical effects in animals, country by countryIs Biochemical effects in animals research growing?
Output in 2022-2025 was 17% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2024. The fastest-growing topics are Biochemical effects in animals.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Biochemical effects in animals as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.028% in 2024.
Fractional works of Biochemical effects in animals over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year.
Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Biochemical effects in animals. Posts are plain text and can be reported.