Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies is a research topic within Sensory Systems. Science Explorer counts 50k research works in it since 1950. 17.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the various aspects of olfactory dysfunction, including its association with COVID-19, neurological implications, neural processing, and the impact on quality of life. It covers topics such as anosmia, olfactory receptors, pheromones, taste disorders, and the role of the olfactory system in health and disease.

  • Olfactory Dysfunction
  • COVID-19
  • Olfactory System
  • Anosmia
  • Olfactory Receptors
  • Neural Processing
  • Pheromones
  • Taste Disorders
  • Neurological Implications
  • Quality of Life
Research works
50k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
8.7k
per year above
Top-10% rate
17.5%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+31%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.4k and 1.3k works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.4k works
  2. 2 China 1.3k works
  3. 3 Japan 583 works
  4. 4 Germany 423 works
  5. 5 United Kingdom 351 works
  6. 6 India 323 works
  7. 7 France 317 works
  8. 8 Italy 312 works
  9. 9 South Korea 262 works
  10. 10 Brazil 210 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 26.1%China: 23.3%Japan: 10.6%Germany: 7.7%6 others listed: 32.3%26%largest
United States1,433 · 26.1%China1,279 · 23.3%Japan583 · 10.6%Germany423 · 7.7%6 others listed1,776 · 32.3%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies research?

By volume in 2022–2025, The University of Tokyo publishes the most Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies research, followed by Technische Universität Dresden and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

Who are the leading researchers in Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies include Elizabeth Loder, Ling Shao and Thomas Hofmann.

  1. 1 Elizabeth Loder United States 13k citations
  2. 2 Ling Shao United Arab Emirates 4.1k citations
  3. 3 Thomas Hofmann Germany 3.5k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies research done?

The largest centres of Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Tokyo (Japan), Seoul (South Korea) and Shanghai (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Dijon and Dresden.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 232 works
  2. 2 Tokyo Japan 189 works
  3. 3 Seoul South Korea 122 works
  4. 4 Shanghai China 116 works
  5. 5 Paris France 103 works
  6. 6 London United Kingdom 95 works
  7. 7 Hangzhou China 76 works
  8. 8 Guangzhou China 73 works
  9. 9 New York United States 71 works
  10. 10 Moscow Russia 64 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. DijonFR · 21.9 works10×
  2. DresdenDE · 42.6 works6.3×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies than the world average.

See Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies on the map

Where is the best place to study Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies?

Among universities, judged by research, Beijing Technology and Business University, Technische Universität Dresden and University of Oxford score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%25%50%75%mean 32.39%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Beijing Technology and Business University: 20, 68.7%Technische Universität Dresden: 30, 10.3%University of Oxford: 21, 48.7%Konkuk University: 10, 26.6%Shanghai Institute of Technology: 11, 36.1%University College London: 21, 32.0%Shanghai Jiao Tong University: 18, 44.1%University of Pennsylvania: 25, 25.2%University of Cagliari: 10, 12.2%Wageningen University & Research: 14, 20.0%Beijing Technology a…University of OxfordKonkuk UniversityTechnische Universit…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Beijing Technology and Business UniversityChina 78.568.7%11.9×20 +106.3%
2 Technische Universität DresdenGermany 56.510.3%8.3×30 +112.8%
3 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 50.848.7%2.1×21 +41.8%
4 Konkuk UniversitySouth Korea 48.426.6%7.4×10 +236.9%
5 Shanghai Institute of TechnologyChina 46.136.1%8.5×11
6 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 42.032.0%2.0×21 +21.3%
7 Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityChina 41.244.1%1.1×18 +66.7%
8 University of PennsylvaniaUnited States 40.625.2%3.6×25 +5.5%
9 University of CagliariItaly 40.312.2%6.2×10 +215.0%
10 Wageningen University & ResearchNetherlands 40.120.0%5.1×14 +28.9%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 31% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2022. The fastest-growing topics are Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.