Armenia vs Belarus
On research quality in 2022-now, Belarus ranks #135 in the world and Armenia #153, of 189 countries. Armenia stands higher in 8 of the 15 fields both publish in, Belarus in 7.
Research profiles alike: 0.45similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Armenia
- World rank, 2022-now
- #153
- #163 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 9.9k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 4.0%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 47%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: General Energy, Archeology, Classics.
Belarus
- World rank, 2022-now
- #135
- #132 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 15k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 3.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 46%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Nuclear Energy and Engineering, General Materials Science, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Armenia leads on 4 of 9 measures: excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work and growth. Belarus leads on 2 of 9 measures: research quality and output. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100, open access and international co-authorship.
- #153Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#135
- 0.43×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.33×
- 9.9kOutputfractional works, 2022-now15k
- 4.0%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited3.4%
- 8.0Citations per workall time, per fractional work6.3
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 47%Open accessof its works free to read, all time46%
- 26%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time26%
- +97%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+0%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Armenia stands higher in 8 of 15 fields, Belarus in 7. Armenia leads most in Arts and Humanities (#82 against #97); Belarus leads most in Materials Science (#64 against #87). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #117Agricultural and Biological Sciences#118
- #82Arts and Humanities#97
- #87Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#85
- #107Business, Management and Accounting#109
- #71Chemistry#61
- #124Computer Science#95
- #102Economics, Econometrics and Finance#103
- #121Engineering#90
- #115Environmental Science#111
- #87Materials Science#64
- #65Mathematics#73
- #119Medicine#125
- #64Physics and Astronomy#70
- #99Psychology#100
- #133Social Sciences#129
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Armenia rank | Belarus rank | Armenia top 10% | Belarus top 10% | Armenia works | Belarus works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #117 | #118 | 4.5% | 3.7% | 579 | 925 |
| Arts and Humanities | #82 | #97 | 5.0% | 6.5% | 544 | 334 |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #87 | #85 | 3.9% | 3.3% | 394 | 680 |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #107 | #109 | 2.7% | 4.3% | 343 | 427 |
| Chemistry | #71 | #61 | 1.5% | 1.9% | 271 | 347 |
| Computer Science | #124 | #95 | 2.8% | 3.3% | 525 | 900 |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #102 | #103 | 4.3% | 2.9% | 523 | 351 |
| Engineering | #121 | #90 | 3.0% | 2.7% | 967 | 2.8k |
| Environmental Science | #115 | #111 | 3.4% | 3.6% | 342 | 624 |
| Materials Science | #87 | #64 | 2.7% | 2.7% | 292 | 1k |
| Mathematics | #65 | #73 | 3.4% | 3.1% | 264 | 374 |
| Medicine | #119 | #125 | 4.6% | 3.2% | 1k | 2.4k |
| Physics and Astronomy | #64 | #70 | 3.9% | 2.1% | 585 | 504 |
| Psychology | #99 | #100 | 3.5% | 4.4% | 291 | 214 |
| Social Sciences | #133 | #129 | 4.9% | 5.0% | 2.1k | 1.8k |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Armenia
- Nation-Building
- Eurasian Exchange
- Cultural Interaction
- Human Capital
- Financial Crisis
- European Legal Systems
- Constitutionalism
- Judicial Review
- Legal Regulation
- Labor Market
- Political Economy
- Economic Growth
- Democracy
- European Immigration
- Renewable Energy
- Cultural Exchange
- Artificial Intelligence
- Human Rights
- Education
- Climate Change
- Globalization
- Sustainable Development
- Sustainability
- Innovation
- Neoliberalism
- Economic Development
- Immigration
- Human Agency
- International Relations
- Geopolitics
- Digital Transformation
- Synthesis
- Agriculture
- Global Governance
- ECHR
- Central Asia
- Sovereignty
- Linguistics
- Ethnic Conflict
- Silk Roads
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization724▲ 3.3×114 topics
- Climate Change514▲ 1.68×110 topics
- Sustainable Development436▲ 2.5×93 topics
- Education435▲ 2.2×90 topics
- Sustainability389▲ 1.41×107 topics
- Human Rights387▲ 3.4×69 topics
- Innovation380▲ 3.3×65 topics
- Artificial Intelligence291▲ 1.81×53 topics
- Neoliberalism288▲ 7.1×19 topics
- Cultural Exchange272▲ 19×7 topics
- Economic Development271▲ 3.0×42 topics
- Renewable Energy242▲ 1.49×51 topics
- Immigration218▲ 18×7 topics
- European Immigration207▲ 181×1 topic
- Human Agency207▲ 181×1 topic
- Democracy186▲ 4.7×21 topics
- International Relations186▲ 6.8×26 topics
- Economic Growth185▲ 2.0×34 topics
- Geopolitics167▲ 9.8×10 topics
- Political Economy163▲ 5.6×15 topics
- Digital Transformation160▲ 2.6×26 topics
- Labor Market160▲ 5.0×13 topics
- Synthesis157▲ 3.7×35 topics
- Legal Regulation151▲ 6.0×8 topics
- Agriculture150▲ 3.5×14 topics
- Judicial Review150▲ 16×5 topics
- Global Governance146▲ 5.4×21 topics
- Constitutionalism140▲ 14×3 topics
- ECHR139▲ 36×1 topic
- European Legal Systems139▲ 36×1 topic
- Central Asia135▲ 17×4 topics
- Financial Crisis123▲ 9.7×14 topics
- Sovereignty119▲ 12×10 topics
- Human Capital118▲ 6.8×9 topics
- Linguistics115▲ 6.5×7 topics
- Cultural Interaction100▲ 35×2 topics
- Ethnic Conflict98▲ 19×4 topics
- Eurasian Exchange95▲ 41×1 topic
- Silk Roads95▲ 41×1 topic
- Nation-Building92▲ 15×4 topics
Belarus
- Geographical Analysis
- Polymer Composite Materials
- Adhesive Joints
- Structural Properties
- Foresight
- Industrial Policy
- Industry 4.0
- Language
- Ethnicity
- Metal Nanoparticles
- Economic Security
- Legal Regulation
- Economic Development
- Regional Development
- Mechanical Properties
- Food Security
- Energy Efficiency
- Digital Transformation
- Epidemiology
- Climate Change
- Sustainable Development
- Artificial Intelligence
- Innovation
- Globalization
- Oxidative Stress
- Sustainability
- Digital Economy
- Renewable Energy
- Nanoparticles
- Digitalization
- Agricultural Development
- Nutrition
- Synthesis
- Global Economy
- Aerospace Applications
- Geopolitics
- Transition
- Cultural History
- Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics
- Information Security
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainable Development948▲ 3.6×91 topics
- Climate Change760▲ 1.65×112 topics
- Artificial Intelligence586▲ 2.4×61 topics
- Epidemiology525▼ 0.78×133 topics
- Innovation508▲ 2.9×67 topics
- Digital Transformation494▲ 5.4×25 topics
- Globalization482▲ 1.45×111 topics
- Energy Efficiency418▲ 2.7×41 topics
- Oxidative Stress414▲ 1.49×63 topics
- Food Security410▲ 4.5×24 topics
- Sustainability404◆ 0.98×102 topics
- Mechanical Properties374▲ 2.2×39 topics
- Digital Economy369▲ 11×19 topics
- Regional Development359▲ 6.2×19 topics
- Renewable Energy331▲ 1.35×55 topics
- Economic Development331▲ 2.4×43 topics
- Nanoparticles313▲ 1.47×44 topics
- Legal Regulation294▲ 7.7×8 topics
- Digitalization253▲ 7.3×14 topics
- Economic Security232▲ 6.5×7 topics
- Agricultural Development225▲ 8.7×7 topics
- Metal Nanoparticles220▲ 8.2×6 topics
- Nutrition215▲ 2.9×14 topics
- Ethnicity207▲ 3.3×18 topics
- Synthesis202▲ 3.2×35 topics
- Language193▲ 4.6×12 topics
- Global Economy189▲ 8.7×7 topics
- Industry 4.0167▲ 19×3 topics
- Aerospace Applications150▲ 9.2×3 topics
- Industrial Policy149▲ 8.2×4 topics
- Geopolitics144▲ 5.6×10 topics
- Foresight144▲ 6.5×2 topics
- Transition140▲ 9.4×6 topics
- Structural Properties138▲ 18×2 topics
- Cultural History136▲ 6.7×9 topics
- Adhesive Joints134▲ 12×2 topics
- Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics132▲ 24×1 topic
- Polymer Composite Materials132▲ 24×1 topic
- Information Security130▲ 7.8×4 topics
- Geographical Analysis126▲ 18×2 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Belarus has out-published Armenia every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 0In the top 5000
- 0In the top 1,0000
- #51Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Armenia or Belarus?
Belarus publishes 1.5× as much research as Armenia in 2022-now (15k against 9.9k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Armenia or Belarus?
4.0% of Armenia's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 3.4% for Belarus.
Is Armenia or Belarus growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +97% against 2018-21 for Armenia, and +0% for Belarus.
Which has more open access research, Armenia or Belarus?
47% of Armenia's research is free to read, against 46% of Belarus's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Armenia or Belarus?
Armenia holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Belarus 0; in the top 1,000 it is 0 against 0.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Armenia
- 1Armenian State University of Economics3.0% top 10% · 787 works
- 2National University of Architecture and Construction of Armenia3.7% top 10% · 322 works
- 3Yerevan State University4.1% top 10% · 2.3k works
- 4Shirak State University0.9% top 10% · 261 works
- 5American University of Armenia10.0% top 10% · 190 works
- 6National Statistical Service of the Republic of Armenia3.5% top 10% · 173 works
Belarus
- 1National Academy of Sciences of Belarus5.2% top 10% · 4.7k works
- 2Euphrosyne Polotskaya State University2.4% top 10% · 452 works
- 3Belarusian National Technical University2.9% top 10% · 900 works
- 4Vitebsk State Medical University1.8% top 10% · 335 works
- 5Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno3.8% top 10% · 323 works
- 6Belarusian State Technological University1.8% top 10% · 472 works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Armenia
- 1 T. Dahms #1,639 worldwide 82k citations · 841 works
- 2 W. Haj Ahmad #1,668 worldwide 47k citations · 510 works
- 3 H. Van Haevermaet #1,688 worldwide 78k citations · 848 works
- 4 P. Ronchese #1,703 worldwide 30k citations · 258 works
- 5 O. Bondu #1,778 worldwide 40k citations · 463 works
Belarus
- 1 Alena Skrahina #47,327 worldwide 8.7k citations · 157 works
- 2 Andrey Litvin #129,746 worldwide 8.9k citations · 233 works
- 3 Dzmitry Mukha #487,907 worldwide 1k citations · 23 works
- 4 Varvara Solodovnikova #491,374 worldwide 2k citations · 46 works
- 5 Svetlana N. Samovich #706,105 worldwide 992 citations · 41 works