Monaco vs New Zealand
On research quality in 2022-now, New Zealand ranks #25 in the world and Monaco #143, of 189 countries. Monaco stands higher in 0 of the 23 fields both publish in, New Zealand in 23.
Research profiles alike: 0.63similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Monaco
- World rank, 2022-now
- #143
- #107 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 326
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 14.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 35%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Oceanography, Marketing, Biotechnology.
New Zealand
- World rank, 2022-now
- #25
- #26 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 48k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 12.0%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 37%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Public Administration, Equine, Medical Terminology.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Monaco leads on 5 of 9 measures: citation excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work, international co-authorship and growth. New Zealand leads on 3 of 9 measures: research quality, output and open access. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #143Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#25
- 1.11×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.05×
- 326Outputfractional works, 2022-now48k
- 14.6%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited12.0%
- 27.8Citations per workall time, per fractional work26.5
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 35%Open accessof its works free to read, all time37%
- 52%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time26%
- -4%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change-6%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Monaco stands higher in 0 of 23 fields, New Zealand in 23. Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- -Agricultural and Biological Sciences#26
- -Arts and Humanities#31
- -Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#27
- -Business, Management and Accounting#23
- -Chemistry#25
- -Computer Science#29
- -Decision Sciences#29
- -Dentistry#28
- -Earth and Planetary Sciences#18
- -Economics, Econometrics and Finance#28
- -Energy#35
- -Engineering#29
- -Environmental Science#26
- -Health Professions#27
- -Immunology and Microbiology#27
- -Materials Science#29
- -Mathematics#35
- -Medicine#24
- -Neuroscience#28
- -Nursing#27
- -Physics and Astronomy#34
- -Psychology#22
- -Social Sciences#30
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Monaco rank | New Zealand rank | Monaco top 10% | New Zealand top 10% | Monaco works | New Zealand works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | - | #26 | - | 13.1% | - | 2.8k |
| Arts and Humanities | - | #31 | - | 15.7% | - | 1.5k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | - | #27 | - | 11.3% | - | 2.6k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | - | #23 | - | 17.1% | - | 1.6k |
| Chemistry | - | #25 | - | 11.0% | - | 452 |
| Computer Science | - | #29 | - | 13.0% | - | 2.7k |
| Decision Sciences | - | #29 | - | 12.0% | - | 566 |
| Dentistry | - | #28 | - | 15.3% | - | 205 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | - | #18 | - | 11.5% | - | 1.2k |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | - | #28 | - | 12.4% | - | 1.2k |
| Energy | - | #35 | - | 13.0% | - | 261 |
| Engineering | - | #29 | - | 11.9% | - | 4.4k |
| Environmental Science | - | #26 | - | 10.2% | - | 3.7k |
| Health Professions | - | #27 | - | 11.4% | - | 2k |
| Immunology and Microbiology | - | #27 | - | 12.0% | - | 393 |
| Materials Science | - | #29 | - | 11.8% | - | 701 |
| Mathematics | - | #35 | - | 9.3% | - | 385 |
| Medicine | - | #24 | - | 11.1% | - | 9.4k |
| Neuroscience | - | #28 | - | 9.3% | - | 964 |
| Nursing | - | #27 | - | 13.2% | - | 355 |
| Physics and Astronomy | - | #34 | - | 10.1% | - | 624 |
| Psychology | - | #22 | - | 11.5% | - | 2.6k |
| Social Sciences | - | #30 | - | 12.6% | - | 7.3k |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Monaco
- Stakeholder Engagement
- Seagrasses
- Marine Natural Products
- Bioprospecting
- Impulse Buying
- Climate Change Impacts
- Marine Organisms
- Human Health
- Aquaculture
- CO2 Emissions
- Benthic Communities
- Ecosystem Services
- Brand Trust
- Marine Environment
- Customer Experience
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Behavior
- Coral Reefs
- Marine Ecosystems
- Ocean Acidification
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Bleaching
- Sustainability
- Environmental Impact
- Oxidative Stress
- Coastal Protection
- Brand Equity
- Health Effects
- Social Capital
- Marine Biodiversity
- Environmental Impacts
- Global Change
- Calcifying Organisms
- Metagenomics
- Ecosystem Resilience
- Multichannel Retailing
- Kelp Forests
- Microbial Symbionts
- Sponge-Associated Microorganisms
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change32▲ 3.1×48 topics
- Ocean Acidification24▲ 84×3 topics
- Epidemiology17◆ 1.11×77 topics
- Marine Ecosystems15▲ 72×2 topics
- Bleaching15▲ 118×1 topic
- Coral Reefs15▲ 118×1 topic
- Sustainability13▲ 1.36×38 topics
- Consumer Behavior12▲ 4.9×11 topics
- Environmental Impact12▲ 1.78×23 topics
- Corporate Governance10▲ 3.7×10 topics
- Oxidative Stress10▲ 1.64×26 topics
- Customer Experience8▲ 12×3 topics
- Coastal Protection8▲ 29×2 topics
- Marine Environment7▲ 13×3 topics
- Brand Equity7▲ 28×1 topic
- Brand Trust7▲ 35×1 topic
- Health Effects7▲ 3.0×15 topics
- Ecosystem Services7▲ 4.6×6 topics
- Social Capital6▲ 3.3×9 topics
- Benthic Communities6▲ 25×2 topics
- Marine Biodiversity6▲ 25×2 topics
- CO2 Emissions6▲ 8.3×3 topics
- Environmental Impacts5▲ 5.1×6 topics
- Aquaculture5▲ 5.2×4 topics
- Global Change5▲ 5.0×3 topics
- Human Health5▲ 8.1×2 topics
- Calcifying Organisms5▲ 107×1 topic
- Marine Organisms5▲ 107×1 topic
- Metagenomics5▲ 14×3 topics
- Climate Change Impacts5▲ 10×4 topics
- Ecosystem Resilience5▲ 8.0×4 topics
- Impulse Buying5▲ 23×1 topic
- Multichannel Retailing5▲ 23×1 topic
- Bioprospecting5▲ 43×2 topics
- Kelp Forests4▲ 38×1 topic
- Marine Natural Products4▲ 26×2 topics
- Microbial Symbionts4▲ 78×1 topic
- Seagrasses4▲ 38×1 topic
- Sponge-Associated Microorganisms4▲ 78×1 topic
- Stakeholder Engagement4▲ 11×3 topics
New Zealand
- Indigenous Health
- Indigenous Knowledge Systems
- Settler Colonialism
- Global Change
- Biogeography
- Ethical Considerations
- Primary Care
- Ethics
- Population Dynamics
- Ecosystem Services
- Social Justice
- Depression
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Invasive Species
- Biodiversity
- Environmental Impact
- Public Health
- Mental Health
- Globalization
- Epidemiology
- Climate Change
- Sustainability
- Machine Learning
- Deep Learning
- Inflammation
- Quality of Life
- Resilience
- Risk Factors
- Vulnerability
- Social Capital
- Health Equity
- Conservation
- Global Warming
- Decolonization
- Neoliberalism
- Well-being
- Habitat Fragmentation
- Reflective Practice
- Traditional Ecological Knowledge
- Historical Trauma
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change2,990▲ 2.0×120 topics
- Epidemiology2,618▲ 1.20×140 topics
- Sustainability1,660▲ 1.24×128 topics
- Globalization1,399▲ 1.30×155 topics
- Machine Learning1,285▼ 0.71×95 topics
- Mental Health1,185▲ 1.52×47 topics
- Deep Learning1,181▼ 0.63×83 topics
- Public Health1,150▲ 1.45×74 topics
- Inflammation1,100◆ 0.95×83 topics
- Environmental Impact1,039◆ 1.11×69 topics
- Quality of Life870◆ 1.10×60 topics
- Biodiversity807▲ 1.94×36 topics
- Resilience776▲ 2.9×18 topics
- Invasive Species743▲ 3.2×21 topics
- Risk Factors731▲ 1.22×37 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease700◆ 1.12×39 topics
- Vulnerability662▲ 5.2×9 topics
- Depression656▲ 1.37×26 topics
- Social Capital551▲ 1.94×20 topics
- Social Justice547▲ 1.68×49 topics
- Health Equity511▲ 3.2×6 topics
- Ecosystem Services508▲ 2.4×14 topics
- Conservation498▲ 2.1×24 topics
- Population Dynamics469▲ 3.3×13 topics
- Global Warming462▲ 1.98×15 topics
- Ethics460▲ 1.66×56 topics
- Decolonization456▲ 10×8 topics
- Primary Care444▲ 2.2×15 topics
- Neoliberalism437▲ 2.2×27 topics
- Ethical Considerations419▲ 2.2×19 topics
- Well-being404▲ 1.90×14 topics
- Biogeography358▲ 2.4×20 topics
- Habitat Fragmentation357▲ 3.0×5 topics
- Global Change354▲ 2.5×7 topics
- Reflective Practice326▲ 3.2×7 topics
- Settler Colonialism268▲ 12×2 topics
- Traditional Ecological Knowledge266▲ 11×2 topics
- Indigenous Knowledge Systems265▲ 15×3 topics
- Historical Trauma256▲ 31×1 topic
- Indigenous Health256▲ 31×1 topic
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
New Zealand has out-published Monaco every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 0In the top 5001
- 0In the top 1,0006
- #51Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#25
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Monaco or New Zealand?
New Zealand publishes 148.0× as much research as Monaco in 2022-now (48k against 326 fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Monaco or New Zealand?
14.6% of Monaco's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 12.0% for New Zealand.
Is Monaco or New Zealand growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was -4% against 2018-21 for Monaco, and -6% for New Zealand.
Which has more open access research, Monaco or New Zealand?
37% of New Zealand's research is free to read, against 35% of Monaco's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Monaco or New Zealand?
Monaco holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and New Zealand 0; in the top 1,000 it is 0 against 6.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Monaco
- 1International University of Monaco14.1% top 10% · 173 works
- 2Scientific Centre of Monaco19.1% top 10% · 91 works
New Zealand
- 1University of Auckland13.6% top 10% · 11k works
- 2University of Otago11.4% top 10% · 6.2k works
- 3Victoria University of Wellington11.5% top 10% · 4.4k works
- 4University of Canterbury12.2% top 10% · 3.3k works
- 5Auckland University of Technology12.1% top 10% · 3.7k works
- 6Massey University13.3% top 10% · 3.7k works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Monaco
- 1 Christine Ferrier‐Pagès #76,466 worldwide 16k citations · 332 works
- 2 Denis Allemand #77,538 worldwide 19k citations · 318 works
- 3 Éric Tambutté #79,835 worldwide 8.7k citations · 169 works
- 4 Didier Zoccola #169,874 worldwide 6.7k citations · 175 works
- 5 Sylvie Tambutté #172,332 worldwide 8.5k citations · 155 works
New Zealand
- 1 Lawrence Jun Zhang #225 worldwide 13k citations · 435 works
- 2 Geoffrey I. N. Waterhouse #3,932 worldwide 62k citations · 716 works
- 3 Simon J. Greenhill #4,052 worldwide 11k citations · 298 works
- 4 Valery L. Feigin #4,707 worldwide 341k citations · 657 works
- 5 Rod Ellis #4,784 worldwide 46k citations · 370 works
Other comparisons
Finlandvs
New Zealand
New Zealandvs
Poland
New Zealandvs
Taiwan
Czechiavs
New Zealand
New Zealandvs
Portugal
Brazilvs
New Zealand