Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Moscow · United States

BioTracking (United States)

Research works
32
▲ 35% vs 2018-21
Citations
454
14.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
14.2%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
34%
world 40%
International
41%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: BioTracking (United States) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does BioTracking (United States) work in?

In all years, 32% of research at BioTracking (United States) is in Life Sciences, 26% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Agricultural and Biological Sciences (15%), Medicine (13%), Engineering (9%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Life Sciences: 10 fractional works · 31.7% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 5 fractional works · 15.1% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 4 fractional works · 13.3% of its workAnimal Science and Zoology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeuroscience: 3 fractional works · 8.1% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workEndocrine and Autonomic Systems: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 7.4% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysical Sciences: 8 fractional works · 25.7% of its workEngineering: 3 fractional works · 9.0% of its workOcean Engineering: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 3 fractional works · 8.7% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 2 fractional works · 5.7% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHardware and Architecture: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 5.6% of its workWater Science and Technology: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPolymers and Plastics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 8 fractional works · 23.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 7.2% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHuman Factors and Ergonomics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPublic Administration: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPsychology: 2 fractional works · 6.9% of its workSocial Psychology: 2 fractional works · 5.5% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workHealth Sciences: 6 fractional works · 19.2% of its workMedicine: 4 fractional works · 12.7% of its workSurgery: 2 fractional works · 4.9% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workInternal Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workComplementary and Manual Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMedical Laboratory Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workVeterinary: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workSmall Animals: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workOral Surgery: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKBioTracking(United States)32fractional works, all years
Life Sciences32%Physical Sciences26%Health Sciences19%Social Sciences23%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 19 fields, with their numbers
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences515.1%
    2. Neuroscience38.1%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology27.4%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.6%
    5. Immunology and Microbiology00.5%
    1. Engineering39.0%
    2. Computer Science38.7%
    3. Environmental Science25.6%
    4. Materials Science11.8%
    5. Physics and Astronomy00.7%
    1. Social Sciences27.2%
    2. Psychology26.9%
    3. Arts and Humanities14.1%
    4. Decision Sciences13.6%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance01.5%
    1. Medicine412.7%
    2. Health Professions14.1%
    3. Veterinary11.8%
    4. Dentistry00.5%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 6.02× its world share, 2 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.15× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.88× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Computer Science: 0.81× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.34× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.96× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceDentistry: 2.60× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 0.48× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.54× its world share, 1 worksMedicineVeterinary: 33.36× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 1.31× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesPsychology: 1.03× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.42× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 33.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 13 fields, with their numbers
  1. Veterinary33.36×0 works
  2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences6.02×2 works
  3. Dentistry2.60×0 works
  4. Environmental Science1.96×1 works
  5. Immunology and Microbiology1.88×0 works
  6. Social Sciences1.42×2 works
  7. Arts and Humanities1.31×0 works
  8. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.15×0 works
  9. Psychology1.03×0 works
  10. Computer Science0.81×1 works
  11. Medicine0.54×1 works
  12. Health Professions0.48×0 works
  13. Engineering0.34×0 works

Who are the top researchers at BioTracking (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Josh R. Branen lead among researchers whose main affiliation is BioTracking (United States).

  1. 1 Josh R. Branen United States · #2,708,682 worldwide 453 citations · 29 works
All ranked researchers at BioTracking (United States)

What are the most cited papers from BioTracking (United States)?

The most cited paper from BioTracking (United States) is "Identifying cognitive state from eye metrics." (Sandra P. Marshall, 2007), with 210 citations. Next come "Eye Metrics as an Objective Assessment of Surgical Skill" (197) and "Population pharmacokinetics of racemic warfarin in adult patients" (105).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Identifying cognitive state from eye metrics. Sandra P. Marshall · PubMed May 2007 210
2 Eye Metrics as an Objective Assessment of Surgical Skill Lee Richstone, Michael J. Schwartz, Casey A. Seideman et al. · Annals of Surgery 18 Jun 2010 197
3 Population pharmacokinetics of racemic warfarin in adult patients Dennis R. Mungall, Thomas M. Ludden, James D. Marshall et al. · Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Jun 1985 105
4 Initiation of warfarin therapy Richard H. R. White, Robyn Hong, Alan Paul Venook et al. · Journal of General Internal Medicine May 1987 100
5 Modernizing and designing evaluation frameworks for connected sensor technologies in medicine Andrea Coravos, Megan J. Doerr, Jennifer C. Goldsack et al. · npj Digital Medicine Open access 13 Mar 2020 84
All 66 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at BioTracking (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Dairy Cattle, Oxidative Stress, Energy Balance, Reproductive Loss, Uterine Disease, Human-Computer Interaction, Virtual Reality and Cognitive Load.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 25 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 25 words, with their numbers
  1. Oxidative Stress4▲ 6.6×3 topics
  2. Dairy Cattle4▲ 168×2 topics
  3. Energy Balance3▲ 111×2 topics
  4. Reproductive Loss3▲ 226×1 topic
  5. Uterine Disease3▲ 226×1 topic
  6. Human-Computer Interaction2▲ 43×2 topics
  7. Virtual Reality2▲ 13×2 topics
  8. Climate Change1▲ 1.68×8 topics
  9. Artificial Intelligence1▲ 4.8×5 topics
  10. Cognitive Load1▲ 107×2 topics
  11. Epidemiology1◆ 0.96×5 topics
  12. Eye Tracking1▲ 127×1 topic
  13. Gaze Estimation1▲ 179×1 topic
  14. Learning1▲ 21×3 topics
  15. Genome-Wide Association1▲ 40×2 topics
  16. Healthcare1▲ 4.6×5 topics
  17. Machine Learning1▲ 1.62×5 topics
  18. Population Genetics1▲ 20×2 topics
  19. Automation1▲ 53×1 topic
  20. Circadian Rhythms1▲ 37×2 topics
  21. Discourse Analysis1▲ 13×1 topic
  22. Genomic Selection1▲ 53×1 topic
  23. Language Variation1▲ 54×1 topic
  24. Plant Breeding1▲ 28×1 topic
  25. Trust1▲ 12×1 topic

Which research topics does BioTracking (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Reproductive Physiology in Livestock, Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies, Education Methods and Technologies and Smart Grid Energy Management.

  1. 1 Reproductive Physiology in Livestock Agronomy and Crop Science 2 works
  2. 2 Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies Water Science and Technology 0 works
  3. 3 Education Methods and Technologies Education 0 works
  4. 4 Smart Grid Energy Management Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works
  5. 5 Sports Science and Education History and Philosophy of Science 0 works
  6. 6 Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  7. 7 Reproductive Biology and Fertility Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  8. 8 Water Quality Monitoring Technologies Water Science and Technology 0 works
  9. 9 Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies Small Animals 0 works
  10. 10 Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring Surgery 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available34.1%not open65.9%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors41.0%domestic only59.0%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has BioTracking (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 35% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is BioTracking (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000044% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%0.00030%BioTracking (United States)0.000028% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of BioTracking (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Moscow

All research institutions in Moscow

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about BioTracking (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.