Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Archive · Brooklyn · United States

Center for Brooklyn History

In research, Center for Brooklyn History stands highest in Medicine (#7,464 of 8,541 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#8,974 of 9,902 worldwide), 2022-now.

World rank, 2022-now
#19,934
of 22,385 · #13,431 all time
Rank in United States
#2,955
of 3,332
Research works
875
▲ 53% vs 2018-21
Citations
14k
16.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
5.5%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.87×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
13%
world 40%
International
3%
world 18%

What is Center for Brooklyn History known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
MedicineField #7,464 of 8,541 5.5%66 #6331
Health SciencesDomain #8,974 of 9,902 5.5%71 #7592

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Center for Brooklyn History sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Center for Brooklyn History work in?

In 2022-now, 69% of research at Center for Brooklyn History is in Health Sciences, 14% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (66%), Psychology (6%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (5%). It does 2.8× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 89 fractional works · 69.4% of its workMedicine: 84 fractional works · 65.8% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 15 fractional works · 11.6% of its workSurgery: 12 fractional works · 9.6% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 10 fractional works · 7.8% of its workOncology: 5 fractional works · 4.3% of its workEpidemiology: 5 fractional works · 4.1% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 4 fractional works · 2.9% of its workInfectious Diseases: 3 fractional works · 2.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 2 fractional works · 2.0% of its workNeurology: 2 fractional works · 1.9% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 2 fractional works · 1.7% of its workHematology: 2 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPhysiology: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGenetics: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEmergency Medicine: 2 fractional works · 1.2% of its workRheumatology: 2 fractional works · 1.2% of its workInternal Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGastroenterology: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHepatology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHealth Informatics: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPharmacology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workImmunology and Allergy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHealth Professions: 4 fractional works · 2.9% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 17 fractional works · 13.6% of its workPsychology: 7 fractional works · 5.5% of its workClinical Psychology: 4 fractional works · 3.2% of its workSocial Psychology: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workGeneral Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 6 fractional works · 4.8% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 1.2% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDemography: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPublic Administration: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 1.7% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArts and Humanities: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLife Sciences: 12 fractional works · 9.3% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 7 fractional works · 5.4% of its workMolecular Biology: 4 fractional works · 3.1% of its workClinical Biochemistry: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCell Biology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPharmacology: 2 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPharmaceutical Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 2 fractional works · 1.2% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workImmunology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workParasitology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 10 fractional works · 7.7% of its workComputer Science: 4 fractional works · 3.4% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 4 fractional works · 2.9% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnvironmental Science: 3 fractional works · 2.4% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAtmospheric Science: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workALL ITS WORKCenter forBrooklyn History128fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences9%Physical Sciences8%Health Sciences69%Social Sciences14%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 22 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine8465.8%
    2. Health Professions42.9%
    3. Dentistry00.3%
    4. Veterinary00.2%
    5. Nursing00.2%
    1. Psychology75.5%
    2. Social Sciences64.8%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance21.7%
    4. Arts and Humanities21.4%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting00.3%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology75.4%
    2. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics21.4%
    3. Neuroscience21.2%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology11.0%
    5. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.3%
    1. Computer Science43.4%
    2. Environmental Science32.4%
    3. Engineering10.8%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences10.5%
    5. Physics and Astronomy00.3%
    6. Chemistry00.3%
    7. Mathematics00.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.02× its world share, 7 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.98× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.74× its world share, 2 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 4.07× its world share, 2 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 0.17× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.43× its world share, 4 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.33× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.06× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.47× its world share, 3 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 0.67× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.08× its world share, 4 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 3.42× its world share, 84 worksMedicineNursing: 0.34× its world share, 0 worksNursingVeterinary: 1.44× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 0.49× its world share, 2 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.08× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.78× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.81× its world share, 7 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.38× its world share, 6 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics, 4.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 22 fields, with their numbers
  1. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics4.07×2 works
  2. Medicine3.42×84 works
  3. Psychology1.81×7 works
  4. Veterinary1.44×0 works
  5. Health Professions1.08×4 works
  6. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.02×7 works
  7. Immunology and Microbiology0.98×1 works
  8. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.78×2 works
  9. Neuroscience0.74×2 works
  10. Dentistry0.67×0 works
  11. Arts and Humanities0.49×2 works
  12. Environmental Science0.47×3 works
  13. Computer Science0.43×4 works
  14. Social Sciences0.38×6 works
  15. Nursing0.34×0 works
  16. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.33×1 works
  17. Chemistry0.17×0 works
  18. Physics and Astronomy0.15×0 works
  19. Business, Management and Accounting0.08×0 works
  20. Engineering0.06×1 works
  21. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.05×0 works
  22. Mathematics0.04×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Center for Brooklyn History?

Ranked on the quality score, Chris Dannen, Madeline Gannon and James Turnbull lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Center for Brooklyn History.

  1. 1 Chris Dannen United States · #2,286,914 worldwide 1k citations · 53 works
  2. 2 Madeline Gannon United States · #2,657,973 worldwide 208 citations · 29 works
  3. 3 James Turnbull United States · #2,854,285 worldwide 138 citations · 17 works
  4. 4 Sibel Deren Guler United States · #3,217,983 worldwide 180 citations · 24 works
  5. 5 Dennis Matotek United States · #3,341,530 worldwide 23 citations · 30 works
  6. 6 Peter Lieverdink United States · #3,383,368 worldwide 12 citations · 28 works
  7. 7 Shree Laya Vemula United States · #3,521,245 worldwide 138 citations · 26 works
  8. 8 Nan H. Ewing United States · #3,579,055 worldwide 14 citations · 20 works
  9. 9 Ron Voller United States · #3,746,009 worldwide 4 citations · 15 works
  10. 10 Thurston Scott Welton United States · #3,750,848 worldwide 28 citations · 22 works
All ranked researchers at Center for Brooklyn History

What are the most cited papers from Center for Brooklyn History?

The most cited paper from Center for Brooklyn History is "Extending the Concept of Stereotype Threat to Social Class: The Intellectual Underperformance of Students from Low Socioeconomic Backgrounds" (Jean‐Claude Croizet, Theresa Claire, 1998), with 851 citations. Next come "Poisoning due to organophosphate insecticides" (589) and "Primary pulmonary hypertension" (400).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Extending the Concept of Stereotype Threat to Social Class: The Intellectual Underperformance of Students from Low Socioeconomic Backgrounds Jean‐Claude Croizet, Theresa Claire · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Jun 1998 851
2 Poisoning due to organophosphate insecticides Tatsuji Namba, Carl T. Nolte, Jerald Jackrel et al. · The American Journal of Medicine Apr 1971 589
3 Primary pulmonary hypertension David T. Dresdale, Martin G. Schultz, Robert J. Michtom · The American Journal of Medicine Dec 1951 400
4 Bacterial Pneumonia in Patients with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Bruce Polsky, JONATHAN W. M. GOLD, ESTELLA WHIMBEY et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine 1986 400
5 Elizabeth M. Ramsey Ralph M. Wynn · Placenta 1994 372
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Center for Brooklyn History?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Myocardial Infarction, Guidelines, Diagnosis, Echocardiography, Immunotherapy, Cardiac Imaging and Treatment.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology14▲ 2.7×57 topics
  2. Diagnosis6▲ 4.7×21 topics
  3. Myocardial Infarction5▲ 17×5 topics
  4. Treatment5▲ 3.4×20 topics
  5. Cardiovascular Disease5▲ 3.4×17 topics
  6. Guidelines5▲ 8.3×8 topics
  7. Immunotherapy5▲ 5.1×10 topics
  8. Inflammation4▲ 1.60×24 topics
  9. Echocardiography4▲ 12×6 topics
  10. Oxidative Stress4▲ 2.0×12 topics
  11. Chemotherapy4▲ 4.3×10 topics
  12. Cardiac Imaging4▲ 24×3 topics
  13. Prognostic Factors4▲ 6.4×9 topics
  14. Heart Failure4▲ 6.1×8 topics
  15. Public Health4▲ 1.88×16 topics
  16. Risk Factors4▲ 2.5×13 topics
  17. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention3▲ 20×4 topics
  18. Surgical Management3▲ 6.1×7 topics
  19. Immune Response3▲ 4.3×10 topics
  20. Mortality3▲ 4.2×10 topics
  21. Clinical Trials3▲ 3.3×8 topics
  22. Thrombosis3▲ 7.8×4 topics
  23. Genetic Mutations3▲ 4.9×10 topics
  24. Clinical Practice Guidelines2▲ 3.6×8 topics
  25. Acute Coronary Syndromes2▲ 44×1 topic
  26. Pancreatic Cancer2▲ 15×2 topics
  27. ST-Segment Elevation2▲ 44×1 topic
  28. Neoadjuvant Therapy2▲ 6.7×2 topics
  29. Therapeutic Targets2▲ 10×3 topics
  30. Cardiovascular Risk Assessment2▲ 19×2 topics
  31. Gemcitabine2▲ 22×1 topic
  32. Radiation Exposure2▲ 15×2 topics
  33. Surgical Complications2▲ 19×1 topic
  34. Arrhythmias2▲ 15×2 topics
  35. Genetic Testing2▲ 12×2 topics
  36. Sudden Cardiac Death2▲ 17×2 topics
  37. Coronary Artery Disease2▲ 11×2 topics
  38. Renal Function2▲ 14×2 topics
  39. Rituximab2▲ 9.1×3 topics
  40. Stroke2▲ 7.8×4 topics

Which research topics does Center for Brooklyn History publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Acute Myocardial Infarction Research, Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture.

  1. 1 Acute Myocardial Infarction Research Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2 works
  2. 2 Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research Oncology 2 works
  3. 3 Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2 works
  4. 4 Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture Artificial Intelligence 2 works
  5. 5 Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research Molecular Biology 1 works
  6. 6 Cardiac tumors and thrombi Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1 works
  7. 7 Pericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1 works
  8. 8 Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Epidemiology 1 works
  9. 9 Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management Internal Medicine 1 works
  10. 10 Coronary Artery Anomalies Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available13.4%not open86.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors3.4%domestic only96.6%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Center for Brooklyn History's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 53% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Center for Brooklyn History as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00065% in 2024.

still counting0.0025%0.0050%0.0075%Center for Brooklyn History0.00055% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Center for Brooklyn History over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

still counting5%10%15%all institutions10.0% in 2025Center for Brooklyn History4.2% in 20252020

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 7.1% in 2019.

Other research institutions in Brooklyn

All research institutions in Brooklyn

Share Center for Brooklyn History's ranking

Center for Brooklyn History on Science Explorer

A card with Center for Brooklyn History's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Center for Brooklyn History. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.