Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Louisville · United States

Community Living

In research, Community Living stands highest in Social Sciences (#8,810 of 14,833 worldwide), Social Sciences (#6,434 of 9,330 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#12,098 of 16,688 worldwide), over all time.

communitylivinginc.comROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022-now
#18,266
of 22,385 · #16,738 all time
Rank in United States
#2,687
of 3,332
Research works
477
▼ 12% vs 2018-21
Citations
5.1k
10.7 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.5%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.91×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
36%
world 40%
International
25%
world 18%
Community Living

What is Community Living known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #8,810 of 14,833 8.5%256
Social SciencesField #6,434 of 9,330 9.3%125
Health SciencesDomain #12,098 of 16,688 7.6%153

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Community Living sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Community Living work in?

In 2022-now, 46% of research at Community Living is in Social Sciences, 34% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (22%), Medicine (22%), Psychology (12%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 38 fractional works · 45.9% of its workSocial Sciences: 19 fractional works · 22.4% of its workSociology and Political Science: 7 fractional works · 7.9% of its workTransportation: 3 fractional works · 3.3% of its workEducation: 3 fractional works · 3.1% of its workDemography: 2 fractional works · 2.4% of its workCommunication: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workDevelopment: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHealth: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLibrary and Information Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychology: 10 fractional works · 12.2% of its workClinical Psychology: 7 fractional works · 7.9% of its workSocial Psychology: 2 fractional works · 2.0% of its workApplied Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGeneral Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 4 fractional works · 4.9% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 2 fractional works · 2.0% of its workManagement Information Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMarketing: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 3 fractional works · 3.8% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPhilosophy: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workConservation: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workFinance: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGeneral Decision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 29 fractional works · 34.4% of its workMedicine: 18 fractional works · 22.2% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 4 fractional works · 4.6% of its workEpidemiology: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 2 fractional works · 2.4% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 2 fractional works · 2.2% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEmergency Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHealth Professions: 9 fractional works · 10.8% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 7 fractional works · 8.2% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workOrthodontics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeneral Dentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workIssues, ethics and legal aspects: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEquine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 12 fractional works · 14.3% of its workComputer Science: 5 fractional works · 6.4% of its workInformation Systems: 2 fractional works · 2.8% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 2 fractional works · 2.4% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHardware and Architecture: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEngineering: 4 fractional works · 4.9% of its workAerospace Engineering: 3 fractional works · 3.2% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEcological Modeling: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 5 fractional works · 5.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 2 fractional works · 2.5% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPlant Science: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workImmunology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSensory Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmaceutical Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKCommunity Living83fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences5%Physical Sciences14%Health Sciences34%Social Sciences46%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 21 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences1922.4%
    2. Psychology1012.2%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting44.9%
    4. Arts and Humanities33.8%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance22.1%
    6. Decision Sciences10.6%
    1. Medicine1822.2%
    2. Health Professions910.8%
    3. Dentistry00.5%
    4. Nursing00.5%
    5. Veterinary00.4%
    1. Computer Science56.4%
    2. Engineering44.9%
    3. Environmental Science22.6%
    4. Materials Science00.4%
    5. Physics and Astronomy00.1%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences22.5%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology11.0%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology11.0%
    4. Neuroscience10.7%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.53× its world share, 2 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.18× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.96× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.45× its world share, 1 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.57× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Computer Science: 0.82× its world share, 5 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.32× its world share, 4 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.53× its world share, 2 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.11× its world share, 0 worksMaterials SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 1.03× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 4.09× its world share, 9 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.15× its world share, 18 worksMedicineNursing: 0.97× its world share, 0 worksNursingVeterinary: 2.95× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 1.32× its world share, 3 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.51× its world share, 4 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.64× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.97× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 4.00× its world share, 10 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.77× its world share, 19 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 4.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 21 fields, with their numbers
  1. Health Professions4.09×9 works
  2. Psychology4.00×10 works
  3. Veterinary2.95×0 works
  4. Social Sciences1.77×19 works
  5. Business, Management and Accounting1.51×4 works
  6. Arts and Humanities1.32×3 works
  7. Medicine1.15×18 works
  8. Dentistry1.03×0 works
  9. Nursing0.97×0 works
  10. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.97×2 works
  11. Immunology and Microbiology0.96×1 works
  12. Computer Science0.82×5 works
  13. Decision Sciences0.64×0 works
  14. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.57×0 works
  15. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.53×2 works
  16. Environmental Science0.53×2 works
  17. Neuroscience0.45×1 works
  18. Engineering0.32×4 works
  19. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.18×1 works
  20. Materials Science0.11×0 works
  21. Physics and Astronomy0.05×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Community Living?

Ranked on the quality score, Anne-Didde Holt, Derek Nord and Yamazaki Sadato lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Community Living.

  1. 1 Anne-Didde Holt United States · #2,751,322 worldwide 138 citations · 19 works
  2. 2 Derek Nord United States · #3,212,424 worldwide 607 citations · 42 works
  3. 3 Yamazaki Sadato United States · #3,806,512 worldwide 0 citations · 16 works
  4. 4 Stephan Emil Junggren United States · #4,002,745 worldwide 23 citations · 16 works
  5. 5 Danielle Louise Nørager Johansen United States · #4,123,353 worldwide 43 citations · 22 works
  6. 6 Takayuki Yamada United States · #4,503,000 worldwide 0 citations · 32 works
  7. 7 Kento Yamada United States · #4,624,014 worldwide 15 citations · 17 works
  8. 8 Kathryn Coucouvanis United States · #4,716,658 worldwide 80 citations · 19 works
  9. 9 Louise Stjerne Knudsen United States · #5,510,187 worldwide 53 citations · 37 works
All ranked researchers at Community Living

What are the most cited papers from Community Living?

The most cited paper from Community Living is "RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses" (Geoff Wong, Trisha Greenhalgh, Gill Westhorp et al., 2013), with 1,386 citations. Next come "The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism" (885) and "RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews" (611).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses Geoff Wong, Trisha Greenhalgh, Gill Westhorp et al. · BMC Medicine Open access 29 Jan 2013 1,386
2 The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism Barry Wellman, Anabel Quan‐Haase, Jeffrey Boase et al. · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 23 Jun 2006 885
3 RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews Geoff Wong, Trisha Greenhalgh, Gill Westhorp et al. · BMC Medicine ReviewOpen access 29 Jan 2013 611
4 Protocol - realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) Trisha Greenhalgh, Geoff Wong, Gill Westhorp et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology Open access 16 Aug 2011 299
5 Communication partners: Enhancing participation in life and communication for adults with aphasia in natural settings Jon G. Lyon, Denise Cariski, L. Keisler et al. · Aphasiology Jul 1997 212
All 62 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Community Living?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, Quality of Life, Culture, Social Support, Science, Ethnicity, Economic Security and Resilience.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Mental Health7▲ 5.6×17 topics
  2. Quality of Life6▲ 5.3×18 topics
  3. Epidemiology5▲ 1.54×29 topics
  4. Culture4▲ 9.0×4 topics
  5. Social Support4▲ 8.3×10 topics
  6. Public Health4▲ 2.9×17 topics
  7. Science3▲ 16×3 topics
  8. Depression3▲ 4.5×10 topics
  9. Healthcare3▲ 3.4×7 topics
  10. History3▲ 5.6×4 topics
  11. Literature3▲ 6.4×3 topics
  12. Resilience3▲ 7.2×6 topics
  13. Economic Security3▲ 16×2 topics
  14. Ethnicity3▲ 9.1×3 topics
  15. Air Force3▲ 27×1 topic
  16. Big Data3▲ 3.5×8 topics
  17. Design3▲ 20×2 topics
  18. Islam3▲ 16×1 topic
  19. Legal Regulation3▲ 14×1 topic
  20. Modernization3▲ 18×1 topic
  21. Social Influence3▲ 15×1 topic
  22. Transport Policy3▲ 26×1 topic
  23. Self-Efficacy2▲ 11×3 topics
  24. Treatment2▲ 2.5×7 topics
  25. Community Health Workers2▲ 31×2 topics
  26. Prevalence2▲ 6.2×5 topics
  27. Psychological Impact2▲ 7.9×4 topics
  28. Anomaly Detection2▲ 8.4×2 topics
  29. Distributed Systems2▲ 14×2 topics
  30. Rural Development2▲ 7.0×4 topics
  31. Communication2▲ 6.4×2 topics
  32. Cultural Studies2▲ 5.4×2 topics
  33. Ethical Considerations2▲ 5.8×8 topics
  34. Health Disparities2▲ 7.8×5 topics
  35. Nursing2▲ 11×4 topics
  36. Health Inequalities2▲ 16×2 topics
  37. Bereavement2▲ 54×1 topic
  38. Complicated Grief2▲ 54×1 topic
  39. Mortality Risk2▲ 7.4×6 topics
  40. Society2▲ 9.4×2 topics

Which research topics does Community Living publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies, Military Technology and Strategies, Legal and Regulatory Analysis and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health.

Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies: 3 fractional worksMilitary Technology and Strategies: 3 fractional worksLegal and Regulatory Ana…3Legal and Regulatory Analysis: 3 fractional worksGrief, Bereavement, and …2Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health: 2 fractional worksBig Data and Business Intelligence: 1 fractional worksGlobal Maternal and Child Health: 1 fractional worksSoftware System Performa…1Software System Performance and Reliability: 1 fractional worksMedia, Communication, and Education: 1 fractional worksHealth and Well-being Studies: 1 fractional worksMigration, Aging, and To…1Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies: 1 fractional works
Sociology and Political ScienceAerospace EngineeringTransportationClinical Psychology5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies Sociology and Political Science 3 works
  2. 2 Military Technology and Strategies Aerospace Engineering 3 works
  3. 3 Legal and Regulatory Analysis Transportation 3 works
  4. 4 Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 2 works
  5. 5 Big Data and Business Intelligence Management Information Systems 1 works
  6. 6 Global Maternal and Child Health Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1 works
  7. 7 Software System Performance and Reliability Computer Networks and Communications 1 works
  8. 8 Media, Communication, and Education Communication 1 works
  9. 9 Health and Well-being Studies Clinical Psychology 1 works
  10. 10 Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies Demography 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available36.5%not open63.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors25.1%domestic only74.9%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Community Living's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 12% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Community Living as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00026% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%0.0015%Community Living0.00038% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Community Living over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Louisville

All research institutions in Louisville

Share Community Living's ranking

Community Living on Science Explorer

A card with Community Living's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Community Living. Posts are plain text and can be reported.