Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Institution · Louisville · United States

James Graham Brown Foundation

In research, James Graham Brown Foundation stands highest in Life Sciences (#2,894 of 11,023 worldwide), Health Sciences (#4,698 of 16,688 worldwide) and Medicine (#4,260 of 14,558 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, all time
#10,164
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#2,103
of 7,310
Research works
718
▼ 58% vs 2018-21
Citations
33k
45.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
13.6%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.19×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
41%
world 40%
International
21%
world 18%

What is James Graham Brown Foundation known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Life SciencesDomain #2,894 of 11,023 15.1%307
Health SciencesDomain #4,698 of 16,688 14.3%332
MedicineField #4,260 of 14,558 14.2%320
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyField #1,845 of 5,801 14.8%225
Molecular BiologySubfield #1,567 of 3,729 14.9%144

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where James Graham Brown Foundation sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does James Graham Brown Foundation work in?

In 2022-now, 56% of research at James Graham Brown Foundation is in Health Sciences, 33% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (54%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (22%), Immunology and Microbiology (7%). It does 2.1× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 25 fractional works · 55.8% of its workMedicine: 25 fractional works · 54.3% of its workOncology: 7 fractional works · 15.8% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 4 fractional works · 9.5% of its workSurgery: 2 fractional works · 4.5% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 2 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workHematology: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workHepatology: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOtorhinolaryngology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Informatics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDermatology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workFamily Practice: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workTransplantation: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workComplementary and Manual Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 15 fractional works · 33.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 10 fractional works · 21.7% of its workMolecular Biology: 6 fractional works · 12.1% of its workCancer Research: 2 fractional works · 5.1% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 3 fractional works · 6.8% of its workImmunology: 3 fractional works · 6.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workBiological Psychiatry: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workDevelopmental Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysical Sciences: 3 fractional works · 6.3% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRadiation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 4.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKJames GrahamBrown Foundation45fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences33%Physical Sciences6%Health Sciences56%Social Sciences5%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 19 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine2554.3%
    2. Health Professions00.7%
    3. Nursing00.6%
    4. Dentistry00.1%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1021.7%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology36.8%
    3. Neuroscience13.3%
    4. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.7%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.7%
    1. Engineering12.9%
    2. Environmental Science11.5%
    3. Materials Science00.9%
    4. Computer Science00.5%
    5. Physics and Astronomy00.4%
    6. Chemistry00.1%
    1. Social Sciences12.6%
    2. Arts and Humanities01.0%
    3. Psychology00.7%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.4%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 4.07× its world share, 10 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 6.79× its world share, 3 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 2.01× its world share, 2 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 1.95× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.19× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.30× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksMaterials SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 0.29× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 0.29× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.82× its world share, 25 worksMedicineNursing: 1.33× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 0.34× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.25× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.20× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Immunology and Microbiology, 6.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 19 fields, with their numbers
  1. Immunology and Microbiology6.79×3 works
  2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology4.07×10 works
  3. Medicine2.82×25 works
  4. Neuroscience2.01×2 works
  5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics1.95×0 works
  6. Nursing1.33×0 works
  7. Arts and Humanities0.34×0 works
  8. Environmental Science0.30×1 works
  9. Dentistry0.29×0 works
  10. Health Professions0.29×0 works
  11. Materials Science0.27×0 works
  12. Psychology0.25×0 works
  13. Physics and Astronomy0.20×0 works
  14. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.20×0 works
  15. Social Sciences0.20×1 works
  16. Engineering0.19×1 works
  17. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.14×0 works
  18. Chemistry0.06×0 works
  19. Computer Science0.06×0 works

Who are the top researchers at James Graham Brown Foundation?

Ranked on the quality score, Yan Dong, Hai Liang Yang and Lindberg Rd lead among researchers whose main affiliation is James Graham Brown Foundation.

  1. 1 Yan Dong United States · #2,895,983 worldwide 691 citations · 42 works
  2. 2 Hai Liang Yang United States · #4,165,013 worldwide 326 citations · 81 works
  3. 3 Lindberg Rd United States · #5,106,690 worldwide 74 citations · 15 works
  4. 3 William J Spanos United States · #5,106,690 worldwide 66 citations · 15 works
All ranked researchers at James Graham Brown Foundation

What are the most cited papers from James Graham Brown Foundation?

The most cited paper from James Graham Brown Foundation is "Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)" (Daniel J. Klionsky et al., 2016), with 6,023 citations. Next come "Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis" (5,359) and "AAPM's TG‐51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high‐energy photon and electron beams" (1,722).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) Daniel J. Klionsky et al. · Autophagy Open access2,467 authors 2 Jan 2016 6,023
2 Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis Lloyd W. Sumner et al. · Metabolomics Open access 11 Sep 2007 5,359
3 AAPM's TG‐51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high‐energy photon and electron beams Peter R. Almond, Peter J. Biggs, Bert M. Coursey et al. · Medical Physics Open access Sep 1999 1,722
4 Role of PFKFB3-Driven Glycolysis in Vessel Sprouting Katrien De Bock et al. · Cell Open access Aug 2013 1,617
5 Applying extracellular vesicles based therapeutics in clinical trials – an ISEV position paper Thomas Lener et al. · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles Open access 2015 1,591
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at James Graham Brown Foundation?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Immunotherapy, Tumor Microenvironment, Chemotherapy, Targeted Therapy, Inflammation, Clinical Trials, Cancer Therapy and Oxidative Stress.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Immunotherapy5▲ 16×13 topics
  2. Inflammation4▲ 3.8×22 topics
  3. Tumor Microenvironment4▲ 17×6 topics
  4. Chemotherapy4▲ 11×14 topics
  5. Oxidative Stress3▲ 3.9×21 topics
  6. Epidemiology3▲ 1.48×16 topics
  7. Targeted Therapy3▲ 26×4 topics
  8. Cancer2▲ 3.9×15 topics
  9. Clinical Trials2▲ 7.5×4 topics
  10. Biomarkers2▲ 6.8×7 topics
  11. Cancer Therapy2▲ 8.4×10 topics
  12. Prognostic Factors2▲ 10×9 topics
  13. Apoptosis2▲ 13×10 topics
  14. Metastasis2▲ 12×5 topics
  15. Radiotherapy2▲ 9.3×8 topics
  16. Cancer Immunotherapy2▲ 23×3 topics
  17. Clinical Practice Guidelines2▲ 6.6×6 topics
  18. Survival Analysis2▲ 13×4 topics
  19. Gene Expression2▲ 5.2×7 topics
  20. Innate Immunity2▲ 11×4 topics
  21. Neuroprotection2▲ 9.4×6 topics
  22. Genomic Profiling1▲ 29×2 topics
  23. Cancer Risk1▲ 12×4 topics
  24. Genomic Instability1▲ 25×2 topics
  25. Lymphoma1▲ 18×2 topics
  26. Tumor Regression1▲ 26×2 topics
  27. Genetic Mutations1▲ 6.3×4 topics
  28. Immune Checkpoint Blockade1▲ 23×1 topic
  29. Immunity1▲ 6.7×5 topics
  30. PD-1 and PD-L11▲ 23×1 topic
  31. Tumor Staging1▲ 23×2 topics
  32. CAR T Cells1▲ 35×1 topic
  33. Cell Death1▲ 10×6 topics
  34. Chimeric Antigen Receptor1▲ 35×1 topic
  35. Melanoma1▲ 39×2 topics
  36. Molecular Characterization1▲ 14×4 topics
  37. Therapeutic Targets1▲ 16×4 topics
  38. Cancer Genomics1▲ 32×1 topic
  39. Immune Suppression1▲ 44×2 topics
  40. Mutational Signatures1▲ 32×1 topic

Which research topics does James Graham Brown Foundation publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers, CAR-T cell therapy research, Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics.

  1. 1 Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers Oncology 1 works
  2. 2 CAR-T cell therapy research Oncology 1 works
  3. 3 Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management Oncology 1 works
  4. 4 Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics Cancer Research 1 works
  5. 5 Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1 works
  6. 6 Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling Physiology 1 works
  7. 7 Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Oncology 1 works
  8. 8 Complement system in diseases Immunology 1 works
  9. 9 Lung Cancer Research Studies Oncology 1 works
  10. 10 Genetic factors in colorectal cancer Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available40.7%not open59.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors20.8%domestic only79.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has James Graham Brown Foundation's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 58% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is James Graham Brown Foundation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00019% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%James Graham Brown Foundation0.00014% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of James Graham Brown Foundation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

10%20%James Graham Brown Foundation18.7% in 2021all institutions10.0% in 202120102020

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 19.1% in 2014.

Other research institutions in Louisville

All research institutions in Louisville

Share James Graham Brown Foundation's ranking

James Graham Brown Foundation on Science Explorer

A card with James Graham Brown Foundation's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about James Graham Brown Foundation. Posts are plain text and can be reported.