- Research works
- 17 ▼ 8% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 378 22.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 26.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 56% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Dansk Sprognævn is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Immunology and Microbiology, 4.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Immunology and Microbiology 4.5×
- Neuroscience 4.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2.9×
- Psychology 1.9×
- Health Professions 1.4×
- Chemistry 1.2×
- Medicine 1.1×
- Environmental Science 0.8×
- Social Sciences 0.7×
- Arts and Humanities 0.7×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.4×
- Materials Science 0.4×
- Engineering 0.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
Which research topics does Dansk Sprognævn publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Online and Blended Learning, Communication in Education and Healthcare, Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems and Innovative Teaching Methods.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Online and Blended Learning Education 0 works
- 2 Communication in Education and Healthcare Social Psychology 0 works
- 3 Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems Aerospace Engineering 0 works
- 4 Innovative Teaching Methods Education 0 works
- 5 Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions Plant Science 0 works
- 6 Botany and Plant Ecology Studies Plant Science 0 works
- 7 Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides Molecular Biology 0 works
- 8 Asthma and respiratory diseases Physiology 0 works
- 9 Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works
- 10 Neurology and Historical Studies Neurology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Dansk Sprognævn's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 8% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Frederiksberg
- Frederiksberg Hospital
- Danish Energy Association
- Danida Fellowship Centre
- Scleroseforeningen
- Dansk Fertilitetsklinik
- Danish Board of District Heating
- Danish Chiropractors’ Association
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.