Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Torrance · United States

MARK Resources (United States)

World rank, all time
#13,913
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#2,872
of 7,310
Research works
321
▲ 8% vs 2018-21
Citations
7.7k
24.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.6%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.96×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
30%
world 40%
International
32%
world 18%

Which fields of science does MARK Resources (United States) work in?

In 2022-now, 39% of research at MARK Resources (United States) is in Social Sciences, 33% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (22%), Medicine (17%), Engineering (15%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 19 fractional works · 38.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 11 fractional works · 22.0% of its workEducation: 8 fractional works · 16.8% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workDemography: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPsychology: 3 fractional works · 6.0% of its workClinical Psychology: 2 fractional works · 3.5% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2 fractional works · 4.3% of its workAccounting: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workMarketing: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 4.3% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workFinance: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 16 fractional works · 33.4% of its workEngineering: 7 fractional works · 15.2% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workOcean Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workMechanical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 5 fractional works · 10.0% of its workInformation Systems: 3 fractional works · 6.3% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workChemistry: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSpectroscopy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysical and Theoretical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workApplied Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGeometry and Topology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Sciences: 11 fractional works · 23.0% of its workMedicine: 9 fractional works · 17.3% of its workSurgery: 2 fractional works · 4.6% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workDermatology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 3.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 2 fractional works · 3.3% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDentistry: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workOral Surgery: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPeriodontics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 5.0% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workAquatic Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKMARK Resources(United States)49fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences5%Physical Sciences33%Health Sciences23%Social Sciences39%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 23 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences1122.0%
    2. Psychology36.0%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting24.3%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance24.3%
    5. Arts and Humanities11.6%
    6. Decision Sciences00.5%
    1. Engineering715.2%
    2. Computer Science510.0%
    3. Environmental Science12.9%
    4. Chemistry12.6%
    5. Mathematics11.5%
    6. Energy00.4%
    7. Materials Science00.4%
    8. Physics and Astronomy00.3%
    1. Medicine917.3%
    2. Health Professions23.7%
    3. Dentistry11.4%
    4. Nursing00.4%
    5. Veterinary00.2%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences12.5%
    2. Neuroscience11.3%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.7%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.4%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.53× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.43× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.79× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 1.64× its world share, 1 worksChemistryComputer Science: 1.28× its world share, 5 worksComputer ScienceEnergy: 0.49× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 1.01× its world share, 8 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.59× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.11× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 1.29× its world share, 1 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 2.90× its world share, 1 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.40× its world share, 2 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.90× its world share, 8 worksMedicineNursing: 0.74× its world share, 0 worksNursingVeterinary: 1.24× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 0.55× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.35× its world share, 2 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.52× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2.01× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.96× its world share, 3 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.74× its world share, 11 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Dentistry, 2.9×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 23 fields, with their numbers
  1. Dentistry2.90×1 works
  2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance2.01×2 works
  3. Psychology1.96×3 works
  4. Social Sciences1.74×11 works
  5. Chemistry1.64×1 works
  6. Health Professions1.40×2 works
  7. Business, Management and Accounting1.35×2 works
  8. Mathematics1.29×1 works
  9. Computer Science1.28×5 works
  10. Veterinary1.24×0 works
  11. Engineering1.01×8 works
  12. Medicine0.90×8 works
  13. Neuroscience0.79×1 works
  14. Nursing0.74×0 works
  15. Environmental Science0.59×1 works
  16. Arts and Humanities0.55×1 works
  17. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.53×1 works
  18. Decision Sciences0.52×0 works
  19. Energy0.49×0 works
  20. Immunology and Microbiology0.43×0 works
  21. Physics and Astronomy0.15×0 works
  22. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.14×0 works
  23. Materials Science0.11×0 works

Who are the top researchers at MARK Resources (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Abraham, Howard F. Illian and Stephen Buxton lead among researchers whose main affiliation is MARK Resources (United States).

  1. 1 Abraham United States · #1,864,944 worldwide 1.9k citations · 101 works
  2. 2 Howard F. Illian United States · #3,033,353 worldwide 633 citations · 16 works
  3. 3 Stephen Buxton United States · #3,195,559 worldwide 111 citations · 24 works
  4. 4 Lindahl United States · #4,410,359 worldwide 313 citations · 31 works
All ranked researchers at MARK Resources (United States)

What are the most cited papers from MARK Resources (United States)?

The most cited paper from MARK Resources (United States) is "Extending the Cross-Cultural Validity of the Theory of Basic Human Values with a Different Method of Measurement" (Shalom H. Schwartz, Gila Melech, Arielle Lehmann et al., 2001), with 2,171 citations. Next come "2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" (2,115) and "2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities" (1,494).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Extending the Cross-Cultural Validity of the Theory of Basic Human Values with a Different Method of Measurement Shalom H. Schwartz, Gila Melech, Arielle Lehmann et al. · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology Sep 2001 2,171
2 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Bernard John Gersh, Barry J. Maron, Robert O. Bonow et al. · Circulation 9 Nov 2011 2,115
3 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities Andrew E. Epstein et al. · Circulation Open access 20 Dec 2012 1,494
4 Cardiorenal Syndrome: Classification, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment Strategies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Janani Rangaswami, Vivek Bhalla, John E. Blair et al. · Circulation Open access 11 Mar 2019 1,419
5 Diagnosis and Treatment of Fetal Cardiac Disease Mary T. Donofrio, Anita J. Moon‐Grady, Lisa K. Hornberger et al. · Circulation Open access 25 Apr 2014 1,280
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at MARK Resources (United States)?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mobile Learning, STEM Education, Character Development, Curriculum Development, Motivation, Character Education, Local Wisdom and Physics Education.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 31 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 31 words, with their numbers
  1. Mobile Learning4▲ 22×4 topics
  2. STEM Education3▲ 15×2 topics
  3. Character Development3▲ 38×2 topics
  4. Curriculum Development3▲ 8.0×3 topics
  5. Motivation3▲ 13×2 topics
  6. Character Education2▲ 9.9×3 topics
  7. Local Wisdom2▲ 10×2 topics
  8. Physics Education2▲ 50×1 topic
  9. Student Attitudes2▲ 47×1 topic
  10. E-Learning2▲ 4.2×2 topics
  11. Sustainability2▲ 1.66×7 topics
  12. Education2▲ 2.2×3 topics
  13. Qualitative Research2▲ 4.4×4 topics
  14. Digital Learning2▲ 6.6×2 topics
  15. Digital Literacy2▲ 5.9×1 topic
  16. School Literacy Movement2▲ 17×1 topic
  17. Machine Learning2◆ 0.92×10 topics
  18. Economic Development1▲ 3.6×5 topics
  19. Online Learning1▲ 3.5×4 topics
  20. Kampus Merdeka1▲ 19×1 topic
  21. Learning Outcomes1▲ 6.5×3 topics
  22. Merdeka Belajar1▲ 19×1 topic
  23. Patient Engagement1▲ 20×1 topic
  24. Public Involvement1▲ 98×1 topic
  25. Cybersecurity1▲ 9.5×3 topics
  26. Globalization1▲ 1.29×3 topics
  27. Epidemiology1▼ 0.55×10 topics
  28. Interactive Multimedia1▲ 19×1 topic
  29. Problem Based Learning1▲ 21×1 topic
  30. Psychotherapy1▲ 193×1 topic
  31. Transactional Analysis1▲ 608×1 topic

Which research topics does MARK Resources (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Educational Methods and Outcomes, Educational Methods and Media Use, Mental Health and Patient Involvement and Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods.

  1. 1 Educational Methods and Outcomes Education 2 works
  2. 2 Educational Methods and Media Use Information Systems 2 works
  3. 3 Mental Health and Patient Involvement General Health Professions 1 works
  4. 4 Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods Education 1 works
  5. 5 STEM Education Education 1 works
  6. 6 Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy Clinical Psychology 1 works
  7. 7 Pancasila Values in Education Education 1 works
  8. 8 Educational Research and Methods Education 1 works
  9. 9 Education and Character Development Education 1 works
  10. 10 Housing Market and Economics Economics and Econometrics 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available30.5%not open69.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors32.3%domestic only67.7%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has MARK Resources (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 8% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is MARK Resources (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00030% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%0.0015%MARK Resources (United States)0.00017% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of MARK Resources (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Torrance

All research institutions in Torrance

Share MARK Resources (United States)'s ranking

MARK Resources (United States) on Science Explorer

A card with MARK Resources (United States)'s standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about MARK Resources (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.