Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Education

Educational Methods and Outcomes

Educational Methods and Outcomes is a research topic within Education. Science Explorer counts 46k research works in it since 1950. 14.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on physics education in Indonesian schools, exploring student attitudes, science process skills, e-module effectiveness, motivation, character development, mobile learning, teaching methodologies, STEM education, and pedagogic competencies.

  • Physics Education
  • Student Attitudes
  • Science Process Skills
  • E-Module
  • Motivation
  • Character Development
  • Mobile Learning
  • Teaching Methodologies
  • STEM Education
  • Pedagogic Competencies
Research works
46k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
6.6k
per year above
Top-10% rate
14.5%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+380%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Educational Methods and Outcomes research?

By volume, Indonesia and ?? publish the most (19k and 517 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Indonesia 19k works
  2. 2 ?? 517 works
  3. 3 Philippines 189 works
  4. 4 Malaysia 185 works
  5. 5 United States 173 works
  6. 6 Nigeria 76 works
  7. 7 Singapore 74 works
  8. 8 India 70 works
  9. 9 Thailand 59 works
  10. 10 Sudan 54 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Indonesia: 93.1%??: 2.5%Philippines: 0.9%Malaysia: 0.9%6 others listed: 2.5%93%largest
Indonesia19k · 93.1%??517 · 2.5%Philippines189 · 0.9%Malaysia185 · 0.9%6 others listed506 · 2.5%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Educational Methods and Outcomes research?

By volume in 2022–2025, State University of Padang publishes the most Educational Methods and Outcomes research, followed by Indonesia University of Education and State University of Medan.

Who are the leading researchers in Educational Methods and Outcomes?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Educational Methods and Outcomes include Sugiyono Sugiyono.

  1. 1 Sugiyono Sugiyono Indonesia 3.2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Educational Methods and Outcomes research done?

The largest centres of Educational Methods and Outcomes research in 2022–2025 are Medan (Indonesia), Jakarta (Indonesia), Semarang (Indonesia) and Padang (Indonesia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Padangsidempuan, Purworejo and Muara Bungo.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Medan Indonesia 1.4k works
  2. 2 Jakarta Indonesia 1.2k works
  3. 3 Semarang Indonesia 994 works
  4. 4 Padang Indonesia 980 works
  5. 5 Makassar Indonesia 927 works
  6. 6 Bandung Indonesia 908 works
  7. 7 Yogyakarta Indonesia 879 works
  8. 8 Surabaya Indonesia 752 works
  9. 9 Malang Indonesia 714 works
  10. 10 Bengkulu Indonesia 654 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. PadangsidempuanID · 487.6 works56×
  2. PurworejoID · 57.7 works47×
  3. Muara BungoID · 40.2 works44×
  4. Kelurahan TounsaruID · 194.7 works39×
  5. SingarajaID · 338.6 works37×
  6. Kediri41.2 works30×
  7. BangkinangID · 43.1 works29×
  8. MeraukeID · 43.8 works28×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Educational Methods and Outcomes than the world average.

See Educational Methods and Outcomes on the map

Where is the best place to study Educational Methods and Outcomes?

Among universities, judged by research, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Yogyakarta State University and Jambi University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%30%mean 19.27%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha: 318, 24.6%Yogyakarta State University: 422, 20.4%Jambi University: 374, 20.3%Universitas Negeri Surabaya: 484, 18.7%State University of Padang: 834, 15.2%Indonesia University of Education: 605, 16.2%Universitas Syiah Kuala: 84, 22.2%Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung: 127, 20.3%State University of Malang: 418, 15.5%Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr Hamka: 144, 19.3%Universitas Pendidik…Yogyakarta State Uni…Jambi UniversityUniversitas Negeri S…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Universitas Pendidikan GaneshaIndonesia 85.524.6%39.7×318 +3843.5%
2 Yogyakarta State UniversityIndonesia 82.420.4%37.0×422 +712.5%
3 Jambi UniversityIndonesia 81.320.3%27.7×374 +1155.2%
4 Universitas Negeri SurabayaIndonesia 80.818.7%32.2×484 +224.2%
5 State University of PadangIndonesia 78.715.2%38.6×834 +2639.0%
6 Indonesia University of EducationIndonesia 78.616.2%30.2×605 +1358.5%
7 Universitas Syiah KualaIndonesia 77.022.2%9.7×84 +1142.5%
8 Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan LampungIndonesia 76.920.3%17.4×127 +3436.9%
9 State University of MalangIndonesia 76.615.5%21.8×418 +1245.7%
10 Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr HamkaIndonesia 75.919.3%33.1×144 +2402.8%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Educational Methods and Outcomes research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 380% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2023. The fastest-growing topics are Educational Methods and Outcomes.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.