Nia Association
In research, Nia Association stands highest in Health Sciences (#7,297 of 16,688 worldwide), Medicine (#6,676 of 14,558 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#7,550 of 14,833 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #13,504 of 22,385 · #9,644 all time
- Rank in United States
- #1,896 of 3,332
- Research works
- 670 ▲ 23% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 8.4k 12.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.0% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.06× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 30% world 40%
- International
- 17% world 18%
What is Nia Association known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #7,297 of 16,688 | 8.2% | 232 | |
| MedicineField | #6,676 of 14,558 | 9.2% | 135 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #7,550 of 14,833 | 7.8% | 287 | |
| Social SciencesField | #6,958 of 9,330 | 7.7% | 124 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Nia Association sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Nia Association work in?
In 2022-now, 44% of research at Nia Association is in Social Sciences, 27% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (20%), Medicine (14%), Health Professions (12%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 24 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences4744.2%
- Health Sciences2926.7%
- Medicine1513.7%
- Health Professions1211.5%
- Dentistry11.0%
- Veterinary00.3%
- Nursing00.2%
- Life Sciences1614.7%
- Physical Sciences1614.4%
- Engineering55.0%
- Computer Science43.8%
- Environmental Science32.8%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences11.2%
- Physics and Astronomy10.5%
- Chemical Engineering00.5%
- Chemistry00.4%
- Mathematics00.3%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 4.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 24 fields, with their numbers
- Health Professions4.38×12 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics2.86×1 works
- Psychology2.59×8 works
- Decision Sciences2.13×2 works
- Veterinary2.06×0 works
- Dentistry1.97×1 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.93×4 works
- Arts and Humanities1.92×6 works
- Neuroscience1.60×3 works
- Social Sciences1.60×22 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.53×8 works
- Chemical Engineering1.33×0 works
- Business, Management and Accounting1.33×5 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.75×1 works
- Medicine0.71×15 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.62×4 works
- Environmental Science0.56×3 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.50×0 works
- Computer Science0.48×4 works
- Nursing0.39×0 works
- Engineering0.34×5 works
- Mathematics0.26×0 works
- Chemistry0.25×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.23×0 works
- Health Professions 4.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 2.9×
- Psychology 2.6×
- Decision Sciences 2.1×
- Veterinary 2.1×
- Dentistry 2.0×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.9×
- Arts and Humanities 1.9×
- Neuroscience 1.6×
- Social Sciences 1.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.5×
- Chemical Engineering 1.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.8×
- Medicine 0.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Environmental Science 0.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.5×
- Computer Science 0.5×
- Nursing 0.4×
- Engineering 0.3×
- Mathematics 0.3×
- Chemistry 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at Nia Association?
Ranked on the quality score, Eduardo Vega, Peter D. Shapiro and J. G. Pearce lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Nia Association.
- 1
Eduardo Vega
United States · #1,829,733 worldwide 765 citations · 29 works
- 2
Peter D. Shapiro
United States · #2,473,448 worldwide 349 citations · 26 works
- 3
J. G. Pearce
United States · #3,318,859 worldwide 36 citations · 17 works
- 4
Andy Clarke
United States · #4,298,873 worldwide 44 citations · 16 works
- 5
John Pazmino
United States · #4,523,744 worldwide 2 citations · 16 works
- 6
André Schiffrin
United States · #4,640,462 worldwide 415 citations · 47 works
- 7
Dauner Cd
United States · #4,865,803 worldwide 13 citations · 20 works
- 8
Sean M Kivlehan
United States · #5,398,074 worldwide 43 citations · 27 works
- 9
Kevin T Collopy
United States · #5,579,127 worldwide 43 citations · 29 works
- 10
Snyder
United States · #5,667,855 worldwide 1.5k citations · 139 works
Which keywords describe research at Nia Association?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, Primary Care, Quality of Life, Community Engagement, Local Development, Territorial Governance, Cultural Heritage and Workflow Management.
- Type III Secretion System
- Plant Pathogenic Bacteria
- Delphi Method
- Consensus Building
- Systematic Review
- Public-Private Partnerships
- Citizen Participation
- Genomic Analysis
- Reproducibility
- Bioinformatics
- Plant Immunity
- Pathogen Transmission
- Healthcare Quality Indicators
- Social Support
- Local Development
- Public Policy
- Resilience
- Sustainable Development
- Public Health
- Quality of Life
- Mental Health
- Primary Care
- Climate Change
- Cultural Heritage
- Community Engagement
- Social Justice
- Territorial Governance
- Workflow Management
- Huanglongbing
- Phytoplasmas
- Viral RNA Silencing
- Ethical Considerations
- Scientific Workflows
- Healthcare Workers
- Environmental Participation
- Forecasting
- Attachment
- Data Sharing
- Knowledge Economy
- Scientific Data Management
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Mental Health6▲ 3.9×21 topics
- Quality of Life4▲ 2.9×14 topics
- Primary Care4▲ 10×7 topics
- Public Health4▲ 2.3×12 topics
- Climate Change4▲ 1.24×17 topics
- Sustainable Development4▲ 2.1×10 topics
- Cultural Heritage3▲ 4.8×9 topics
- Resilience3▲ 4.9×8 topics
- Community Engagement2▲ 7.2×5 topics
- Public Policy2▲ 4.6×5 topics
- Social Justice2▲ 3.6×7 topics
- Local Development2▲ 20×2 topics
- Territorial Governance2▲ 18×2 topics
- Social Support2▲ 3.6×8 topics
- Workflow Management2▲ 27×2 topics
- Healthcare Quality Indicators2▲ 32×2 topics
- Huanglongbing2▲ 167×1 topic
- Pathogen Transmission2▲ 27×2 topics
- Phytoplasmas2▲ 167×1 topic
- Plant Immunity2▲ 20×1 topic
- Viral RNA Silencing2▲ 52×1 topic
- Bioinformatics2▲ 14×2 topics
- Ethical Considerations2▲ 4.6×6 topics
- Reproducibility2▲ 41×1 topic
- Scientific Workflows2▲ 41×1 topic
- Genomic Analysis2▲ 5.6×3 topics
- Healthcare Workers2▲ 6.4×4 topics
- Citizen Participation2▲ 12×1 topic
- Environmental Participation2▲ 20×1 topic
- Public-Private Partnerships2▲ 18×3 topics
- Forecasting1▲ 6.9×2 topics
- Systematic Review1▲ 25×2 topics
- Attachment1▲ 14×3 topics
- Consensus Building1▲ 49×1 topic
- Data Sharing1▲ 39×1 topic
- Delphi Method1▲ 49×1 topic
- Knowledge Economy1▲ 11×3 topics
- Plant Pathogenic Bacteria1▲ 61×1 topic
- Scientific Data Management1▲ 47×1 topic
- Type III Secretion System1▲ 22×1 topic
Which research topics does Nia Association publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Plant Virus Research Studies, Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens, Scientific Computing and Data Management and French Urban and Social Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Plant Virus Research Studies Plant Science 2 works
- 2 Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens Plant Science 2 works
- 3 Scientific Computing and Data Management Information Systems and Management 2 works
- 4 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 5 Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies Plant Science 1 works
- 6 Delphi Technique in Research Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 7 Research Data Management Practices Information Systems 1 works
- 8 Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 9 Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility Occupational Therapy 1 works
- 10 Pharmacy and Medical Practices Pharmacology 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Nia Association's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 23% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Nia Association as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00037% in 2024.
Fractional works of Nia Association over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Clarksville
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Nia Association. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
