Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Phoenix · United States

Ping (United States)

Research works
95
▼ 43% vs 2018-21
Citations
691
7.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
6.9%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
37%
world 40%
International
17%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Ping (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Ping (United States) work in?

In all years, 62% of research at Ping (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 16% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (46%), Medicine (9%), Environmental Science (6%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 60 fractional works · 62.5% of its workEngineering: 44 fractional works · 45.9% of its workMechanical Engineering: 11 fractional works · 11.5% of its workAerospace Engineering: 8 fractional works · 8.2% of its workComputational Mechanics: 6 fractional works · 6.6% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 6 fractional works · 5.8% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 3 fractional works · 3.3% of its workMechanics of Materials: 2 fractional works · 2.4% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 2 fractional works · 2.3% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 2 fractional works · 1.8% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 2 fractional works · 1.7% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnvironmental Science: 6 fractional works · 6.3% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 2 fractional works · 1.7% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPollution: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 4 fractional works · 4.6% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 2 fractional works · 1.7% of its workGeophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeochemistry and Petrology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth-Surface Processes: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workApplied Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDiscrete Mathematics and Combinatorics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workFluid Flow and Transfer Processes: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnergy Engineering and Power Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 15 fractional works · 15.7% of its workMedicine: 9 fractional works · 9.4% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 2 fractional works · 2.5% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHealth Professions: 5 fractional works · 5.1% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 2 fractional works · 2.3% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMedical Laboratory Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNursing: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workIssues, ethics and legal aspects: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeneral Dentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 12 fractional works · 12.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 5 fractional works · 5.0% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 2.0% of its workDevelopment: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workTransportation: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 2.4% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 2.4% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2 fractional works · 1.9% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 2 fractional works · 1.7% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 9 fractional works · 9.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 4 fractional works · 4.5% of its workPlant Science: 2 fractional works · 2.5% of its workSoil Science: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 2.4% of its workMolecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 1.7% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEndocrinology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workMicrobiology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workDevelopmental Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKPing (UnitedStates)95fractional works, all years
Life Sciences9%Physical Sciences62%Health Sciences16%Social Sciences13%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 26 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering4445.9%
    2. Environmental Science66.3%
    3. Computer Science44.6%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences21.7%
    5. Physics and Astronomy21.6%
    6. Mathematics10.9%
    7. Chemical Engineering10.7%
    8. Energy00.3%
    9. Chemistry00.3%
    10. Materials Science00.2%
    1. Medicine99.4%
    2. Health Professions55.1%
    3. Nursing10.8%
    4. Dentistry00.3%
    5. Veterinary00.2%
    1. Social Sciences55.0%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance22.4%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting21.9%
    4. Psychology21.7%
    5. Arts and Humanities10.8%
    6. Decision Sciences10.7%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences44.5%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology22.4%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology11.0%
    4. Neuroscience10.9%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.64× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.97× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Chemistry: 0.11× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 1.64× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1.25× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 1.04× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 2.55× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.35× its world share, 0 worksMaterials SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 1.65× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 1.02× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.98× its world share, 2 worksMedicineNursing: 3.43× its world share, 0 worksNursingBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2.28× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Psychology: 0.47× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.92× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Nursing, 3.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 15 fields, with their numbers
  1. Nursing3.43×0 works
  2. Environmental Science2.55×1 works
  3. Business, Management and Accounting2.28×1 works
  4. Physics and Astronomy1.65×0 works
  5. Computer Science1.64×1 works
  6. Earth and Planetary Sciences1.25×0 works
  7. Engineering1.04×1 works
  8. Health Professions1.02×0 works
  9. Medicine0.98×2 works
  10. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.97×0 works
  11. Social Sciences0.92×1 works
  12. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.64×0 works
  13. Psychology0.47×0 works
  14. Materials Science0.35×0 works
  15. Chemistry0.11×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Ping (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Erik Henrikson, Thomas M. Olsen and Paul Wood lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Ping (United States).

  1. 1 Erik Henrikson United States · #4,056,663 worldwide 328 citations · 28 works
  2. 2 Thomas M. Olsen United States · #4,504,311 worldwide 6 citations · 17 works
  3. 3 Paul Wood United States · #5,254,208 worldwide 51 citations · 31 works
All ranked researchers at Ping (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Ping (United States)?

The most cited paper from Ping (United States) is "Robotic transtibial prosthesis with biomechanical energy regeneration" (Joseph K. Hitt, Thomas G. Sugar, Matthew A. Holgate et al., 2009), with 115 citations. Next come "Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke" (89) and "Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Tanezumab for the Symptomatic Treatment of Osteoarthritis: 2 Randomized Controlled Trials versus Naproxen" (86).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Robotic transtibial prosthesis with biomechanical energy regeneration Joseph K. Hitt, Thomas G. Sugar, Matthew A. Holgate et al. · Industrial Robot the international journal of robotics research and application 21 Aug 2009 115
2 Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke Richard I. Lindley et al. · Stroke Open access 23 Jan 2015 89
3 Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Tanezumab for the Symptomatic Treatment of Osteoarthritis: 2 Randomized Controlled Trials versus Naproxen Evan F. Ekman, Joseph S Gimbel, Alfonso E. Bello et al. · The Journal of Rheumatology Open access Oct 2014 86
4 MAGNETIC ANOMALY MAP OF NORTH AMERICA William J. Hinze, Peter J. Hood, William E. Bonini et al. · The Leading Edge Nov 1988 55
5 Triangular Plate Bending Elements with Enforced Compatibility John W. Harvey, Sean Kelsey · AIAA Journal Jun 1971 51
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Ping (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Heat Transfer, Large-Eddy Simulation, Boundary Layer, Film Cooling, Turbine, Tribological Performance, Injury Prevention and Friction Reduction.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Heat Transfer7▲ 15×7 topics
  2. Large-Eddy Simulation6▲ 27×4 topics
  3. Boundary Layer5▲ 38×3 topics
  4. Climate Change4▲ 1.64×13 topics
  5. Film Cooling4▲ 238×1 topic
  6. Turbine4▲ 238×1 topic
  7. Tribological Performance3▲ 57×2 topics
  8. Environmental Impact3▲ 2.6×9 topics
  9. Injury Prevention3▲ 31×2 topics
  10. Friction Reduction3▲ 93×1 topic
  11. Laser Surface Texturing3▲ 93×1 topic
  12. Golf Biomechanics3▲ 245×1 topic
  13. Swing Kinematics3▲ 245×1 topic
  14. Assembly Planning3▲ 34×1 topic
  15. Design for Manufacture3▲ 34×1 topic
  16. Nonlinear Dynamics3▲ 12×4 topics
  17. Control2▲ 18×3 topics
  18. Vibration Analysis2▲ 7.8×4 topics
  19. Actuators2▲ 16×2 topics
  20. Simulation2▲ 7.1×3 topics
  21. Adaptive2▲ 42×2 topics
  22. Combustion Instabilities2▲ 28×2 topics
  23. Modeling2▲ 8.2×2 topics
  24. Performance Analysis2▲ 12×1 topic
  25. Training Load2▲ 36×1 topic
  26. Hydraulic Systems2▲ 34×1 topic
  27. Robust2▲ 48×1 topic
  28. CFD Simulation2▲ 15×3 topics
  29. Thermodynamic Analysis2▲ 34×2 topics
  30. Emissions2▲ 9.1×3 topics
  31. Social Systems2▲ 51×2 topics
  32. Student Engagement2▲ 7.1×5 topics
  33. Adaptive Mesh Refinement2▲ 19×2 topics
  34. Ejectors2▲ 61×1 topic
  35. High-Order Schemes2▲ 19×2 topics
  36. Refrigerants2▲ 61×1 topic
  37. Air Quality1▲ 8.1×3 topics
  38. Chemical Kinetics1▲ 14×2 topics
  39. Shock-Wave Interactions1▲ 27×1 topic
  40. Turbulence Modeling1▲ 27×1 topic

Which research topics does Ping (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Chaos, Complexity, and Education, Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems, University-Industry-Government Innovation Models and Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics.

  1. 1 Chaos, Complexity, and Education Computational Theory and Mathematics 1 works
  2. 2 Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  3. 3 University-Industry-Government Innovation Models Management of Technology and Innovation 1 works
  4. 4 Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics Biomedical Engineering 0 works
  5. 5 Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life Astronomy and Astrophysics 0 works
  6. 6 Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts Pollution 0 works
  7. 7 Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies Biomedical Engineering 0 works
  8. 8 Sports Performance and Training Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 0 works
  9. 9 Microbial Applications in Construction Materials Environmental Engineering 0 works
  10. 10 Shoulder Injury and Treatment Surgery 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available37.2%not open62.8%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors16.8%domestic only83.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Ping (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 43% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Ping (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000022% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%0.0030%Ping (United States)0.000034% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Ping (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Phoenix

All research institutions in Phoenix

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Ping (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.