- Research works
- 62 ▲ 43% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 1.2k 19.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 7.6% all institutions 10.0%
- Open access
- 23% world 40%
- International
- 20% world 18%
Not ranked overall: Positive Resource Center is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Which fields of science does Positive Resource Center work in?
In all years, 52% of research at Positive Resource Center is in Health Sciences, 42% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (33%), Health Professions (18%), Social Sciences (14%). It does 2.0× the world's share of Health Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
- Health Sciences3352.3%
- Medicine2133.1%
- Health Professions1118.3%
- Dentistry11.0%
- Social Sciences2642.2%
- Social Sciences914.1%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance711.9%
- Business, Management and Accounting711.0%
- Psychology23.9%
- Decision Sciences11.3%
- Physical Sciences23.0%
- Engineering11.1%
- Computer Science11.1%
- Physics and Astronomy00.4%
- Materials Science00.3%
- Mathematics00.2%
- Life Sciences22.5%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 6.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 14 fields, with their numbers
- Decision Sciences6.20×0 works
- Immunology and Microbiology3.57×0 works
- Psychology2.85×1 works
- Neuroscience2.42×0 works
- Medicine2.20×4 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics2.15×0 works
- Social Sciences1.48×2 works
- Health Professions1.28×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy1.13×0 works
- Mathematics1.07×0 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.79×0 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.63×0 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.40×0 works
- Engineering0.13×0 works
- Decision Sciences 6.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology 3.6×
- Psychology 2.9×
- Neuroscience 2.4×
- Medicine 2.2×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 2.1×
- Social Sciences 1.5×
- Health Professions 1.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 1.1×
- Mathematics 1.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.8×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.4×
- Engineering 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Positive Resource Center?
Ranked on the quality score, Ronald Loeppke, Kimberly Jinnett and Mark Smith lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Positive Resource Center.
- 1
Ronald Loeppke
United States · #461,028 worldwide 2.3k citations · 28 works
- 2
Kimberly Jinnett
United States · #1,532,272 worldwide 1.8k citations · 55 works
- 3
Mark Smith
United States · #2,085,961 worldwide 558 citations · 44 works
- 4
THOMAS G. PARRY
United States · #2,093,334 worldwide 1.4k citations · 64 works
- 5
Brian Gifford
United States · #2,771,366 worldwide 486 citations · 41 works
Which keywords describe research at Positive Resource Center?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Primary Care, Health Care Utilization, Cardiovascular Disease, Health Care Spending, Insurance Markets, Income Inequality, Psychosocial Work Environment and Work-related Stress.
- Regulatory Competition
- European Company Law
- Surgical Treatment
- Quality Improvement
- Criminal Justice
- Chronic Disease Management
- HIV Transmission
- Aging Workforce
- Retirement Planning
- Intellectual Property
- Occupational Safety
- Firm Performance
- Global Burden
- Human Rights
- Low Back Pain
- Antiretroviral Therapy
- Psychosocial Work Environment
- Insurance Markets
- Health Care Utilization
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Primary Care
- Epidemiology
- Health Care Spending
- Income Inequality
- Work-related Stress
- Health Outcomes
- Degenerative Disc Disease
- Mental Health
- Corporate Governance
- Spinal Fusion
- Constitutional Law
- Financial Literacy
- Social Determinants of Health
- Chronic Disease
- Retirement
- Chronic Pain
- Preexposure Prophylaxis
- Stigma and Discrimination
- Surveillance
- Psychological Factors
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Primary Care4▲ 16×6 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease4▲ 5.2×6 topics
- Epidemiology4▲ 1.45×22 topics
- Health Care Utilization3▲ 39×2 topics
- Health Care Spending3▲ 74×1 topic
- Insurance Markets3▲ 74×1 topic
- Income Inequality3▲ 33×3 topics
- Psychosocial Work Environment3▲ 182×1 topic
- Work-related Stress3▲ 80×1 topic
- Antiretroviral Therapy2▲ 17×5 topics
- Health Outcomes2▲ 17×5 topics
- Low Back Pain2▲ 23×2 topics
- Degenerative Disc Disease2▲ 40×2 topics
- Human Rights2▲ 4.0×3 topics
- Mental Health2▲ 3.0×6 topics
- Global Burden2▲ 5.9×3 topics
- Corporate Governance2▲ 5.7×3 topics
- Firm Performance2▲ 20×3 topics
- Spinal Fusion2▲ 34×2 topics
- Occupational Safety2▲ 40×2 topics
- Constitutional Law2▲ 20×2 topics
- Intellectual Property2▲ 26×2 topics
- Financial Literacy2▲ 52×1 topic
- Retirement Planning2▲ 87×1 topic
- Social Determinants of Health2▲ 11×3 topics
- Aging Workforce1▲ 94×1 topic
- Chronic Disease1▲ 14×3 topics
- HIV Transmission1▲ 26×2 topics
- Retirement1▲ 31×1 topic
- Chronic Disease Management1▲ 14×4 topics
- Chronic Pain1▲ 9.3×2 topics
- Criminal Justice1▲ 14×2 topics
- Preexposure Prophylaxis1▲ 37×1 topic
- Quality Improvement1▲ 10×4 topics
- Stigma and Discrimination1▲ 37×1 topic
- Surgical Treatment1▲ 10×4 topics
- Surveillance1▲ 14×2 topics
- European Company Law1▲ 90×1 topic
- Psychological Factors1▲ 11×2 topics
- Regulatory Competition1▲ 90×1 topic
Which research topics does Positive Resource Center publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers, Legal Education and Practice Innovations, Legal Issues in Education and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers Oncology 0 works
- 2 Legal Education and Practice Innovations Law 0 works
- 3 Legal Issues in Education Law 0 works
- 4 Autism Spectrum Disorder Research Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works
- 5 Legal Systems and Judicial Processes Political Science and International Relations 0 works
- 6 Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
- 7 Immune Cell Function and Interaction Immunology 0 works
- 8 Disability Rights and Representation Safety Research 0 works
- 9 Diabetes and associated disorders Genetics 0 works
- 10 Family and Disability Support Research Clinical Psychology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Positive Resource Center's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 43% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Positive Resource Center as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000019% in 2024.
Fractional works of Positive Resource Center over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in San Francisco
- University of California, San Francisco
- San Francisco State University
- University of San Francisco
- Institute on Aging
- Golden Gate University
- Bechtel (United States)
- University of California Hastings College of the Law
- Cal Humanities
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Positive Resource Center. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.