Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Nonprofit · Brooklyn · United States

Public Agenda

World rank, all time
#26,400
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#5,520
of 7,310
Research works
175
▲ 15% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.4k
8.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
5.4%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.06×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
69%
world 40%
International
42%
world 18%

Which fields of science does Public Agenda work in?

In 2022-now, 66% of research at Public Agenda is in Social Sciences, 21% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (43%), Environmental Science (10%), Business, Management and Accounting (10%). It does 2.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 29 fractional works · 66.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 19 fractional works · 43.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 6 fractional works · 13.2% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 3 fractional works · 7.4% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 5.5% of its workLaw: 2 fractional works · 3.7% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workUrban Studies: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workHealth: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workDemography: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workCommunication: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDevelopment: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHuman Factors and Ergonomics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 4 fractional works · 9.7% of its workAccounting: 2 fractional works · 4.5% of its workMarketing: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 2 fractional works · 5.0% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPhilosophy: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 4.4% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 4.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 9 fractional works · 20.9% of its workEnvironmental Science: 4 fractional works · 10.1% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 3 fractional works · 6.9% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workPaleontology: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSpace and Planetary Science: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workAtmospheric Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnergy: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workGeneral Energy: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workModeling and Simulation: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workFluid Flow and Transfer Processes: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Sciences: 4 fractional works · 8.3% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 4.4% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 2 fractional works · 4.1% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 3.6% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOrthodontics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 4.5% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workMicrobiology: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workALL ITS WORKPublic Agenda44fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences5%Physical Sciences21%Health Sciences8%Social Sciences66%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 21 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences1943.3%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting49.7%
    3. Arts and Humanities25.0%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance24.4%
    5. Psychology12.0%
    6. Decision Sciences11.8%
    1. Environmental Science410.1%
    2. Earth and Planetary Sciences12.6%
    3. Energy12.5%
    4. Engineering12.4%
    5. Computer Science12.0%
    6. Mathematics00.8%
    7. Chemical Engineering00.6%
    1. Health Professions24.4%
    2. Medicine23.6%
    3. Dentistry00.3%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences11.7%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology11.6%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.8%
    4. Neuroscience00.3%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.37× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.62× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.18× its world share, 0 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.13× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemical Engineering: 1.64× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringComputer Science: 0.26× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1.65× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 2.67× its world share, 1 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.16× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 2.04× its world share, 4 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 0.65× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsDentistry: 0.53× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.68× its world share, 2 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.19× its world share, 2 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 1.73× its world share, 2 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 3.00× its world share, 4 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 1.90× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2.04× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.67× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 3.42× its world share, 19 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Social Sciences, 3.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 21 fields, with their numbers
  1. Social Sciences3.42×19 works
  2. Business, Management and Accounting3.00×4 works
  3. Energy2.67×1 works
  4. Environmental Science2.04×4 works
  5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance2.04×2 works
  6. Decision Sciences1.90×1 works
  7. Arts and Humanities1.73×2 works
  8. Health Professions1.68×2 works
  9. Earth and Planetary Sciences1.65×1 works
  10. Chemical Engineering1.64×0 works
  11. Immunology and Microbiology1.62×1 works
  12. Psychology0.67×1 works
  13. Mathematics0.65×0 works
  14. Dentistry0.53×0 works
  15. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.37×1 works
  16. Computer Science0.26×1 works
  17. Medicine0.19×2 works
  18. Neuroscience0.18×0 works
  19. Engineering0.16×1 works
  20. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.15×0 works
  21. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.13×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Public Agenda?

Ranked on the quality score, Daniel Yankelovich, Alison Kadlec and Will Friedman lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Public Agenda.

  1. 1 Daniel Yankelovich United States · #723,977 worldwide 2k citations · 99 works
  2. 2 Alison Kadlec United States · #2,049,414 worldwide 273 citations · 17 works
  3. 3 Will Friedman United States · #2,736,669 worldwide 260 citations · 17 works
  4. 4 Henry Kyambalesa United States · #3,214,828 worldwide 43 citations · 28 works
  5. 5 Amber Ott United States · #3,686,104 worldwide 248 citations · 18 works
  6. 6 PATRICIA DE ALBUQUERQUE SOBREIRA United States · #4,575,598 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
  7. 7 Lou Haysom United States · #4,846,056 worldwide 65 citations · 50 works
All ranked researchers at Public Agenda

What are the most cited papers from Public Agenda?

The most cited paper from Public Agenda is "Sustainable development must account for pandemic risk" (Moreno Di Marco, Michelle L. Baker, Peter Daszak et al., 2020), with 306 citations. Next come "Improving Classroom Quality with The RULER Approach to Social and Emotional Learning: Proximal and Distal Outcomes" (161) and "Managing Scarcity: Priority Setting and Rationing in the National Health Service" (137).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Sustainable development must account for pandemic risk Moreno Di Marco, Michelle L. Baker, Peter Daszak et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Open access 14 Feb 2020 306
2 Improving Classroom Quality with The RULER Approach to Social and Emotional Learning: Proximal and Distal Outcomes Carolin Hagelskamp, Marc A. Brackett, Susan E. Rivers et al. · American Journal of Community Psychology 26 Feb 2013 161
3 Managing Scarcity: Priority Setting and Rationing in the National Health Service Iona Heath · BMJ 25 Jan 1997 137
4 Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Scope Will Friedman · Journal of Deliberative Democracy Open access 14 Apr 2006 128
5 Cytosolic aggregation of mitochondrial proteins disrupts cellular homeostasis by stimulating the aggregation of other proteins Urszula Nowicka, Piotr Chrościcki, Karen Stroobants et al. · eLife Open access 20 Jul 2021 127
All 62 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Public Agenda?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Sustainability, Globalization, Human Rights, Identity, Sustainable Development, Renewable Energy, Public Policy and Social Justice.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Sustainability5▲ 4.9×18 topics
  2. Globalization5▲ 5.4×19 topics
  3. Human Rights4▲ 8.3×15 topics
  4. Sustainable Development3▲ 4.8×6 topics
  5. Identity3▲ 9.7×7 topics
  6. Renewable Energy3▲ 4.9×6 topics
  7. Public Policy2▲ 12×7 topics
  8. Social Justice2▲ 8.8×9 topics
  9. Public Health2▲ 3.5×9 topics
  10. Global Governance2▲ 20×5 topics
  11. Development2▲ 13×5 topics
  12. Environmental Education2▲ 30×3 topics
  13. Social Inequality2▲ 16×5 topics
  14. Cultural Identity2▲ 8.2×4 topics
  15. Sustainable Development Goals2▲ 22×3 topics
  16. Water Resources2▲ 16×2 topics
  17. Biodiversity2▲ 4.8×2 topics
  18. Latin America2▲ 19×6 topics
  19. Social Participation2▲ 62×1 topic
  20. Waste Management2▲ 9.1×1 topic
  21. Corporate Governance2▲ 4.7×2 topics
  22. Social Norms1▲ 32×2 topics
  23. Discourse Analysis1▲ 12×3 topics
  24. Political Economy1▲ 12×5 topics
  25. Vaccine1▲ 7.3×4 topics
  26. Brazil1▲ 31×3 topics
  27. Social Determinants of Health1▲ 13×3 topics
  28. Brazilian Health System1▲ 59×1 topic
  29. Chronic Diseases1▲ 9.6×1 topic
  30. Constitutional Law1▲ 20×4 topics
  31. Corporate Social Responsibility1▲ 15×2 topics
  32. Diversity1▲ 14×1 topic
  33. Geopolitics1▲ 16×3 topics
  34. Global Citizenship Education1▲ 48×1 topic
  35. Primary Care1▲ 7.1×2 topics
  36. Queer Theory1▲ 55×2 topics
  37. Social Policy1▲ 28×2 topics
  38. Urbanization1▲ 6.5×4 topics
  39. Canada1▲ 208×1 topic
  40. Contract Visualization1▲ 520×1 topic

Which research topics does Public Agenda publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Environmental Sustainability and Education, Global Education and Multiculturalism, Health, Nursing, Elderly Care and Canadian Identity and History.

  1. 1 Environmental Sustainability and Education Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 2 works
  2. 2 Global Education and Multiculturalism Education 1 works
  3. 3 Health, Nursing, Elderly Care General Health Professions 1 works
  4. 4 Canadian Identity and History Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  5. 5 Management, Economics, and Public Policy Marketing 1 works
  6. 6 Gender, Sexuality, and Education Gender Studies 1 works
  7. 7 Business Law and Ethics Accounting 1 works
  8. 8 Human Rights and Development Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  9. 9 Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy Health 1 works
  10. 10 Education and Digital Technologies Sociology and Political Science 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available68.7%not open31.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors41.5%domestic only58.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Public Agenda's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 15% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Public Agenda as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00021% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%Public Agenda0.00012% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Public Agenda over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Brooklyn

All research institutions in Brooklyn

Share Public Agenda's ranking

Public Agenda on Science Explorer

A card with Public Agenda's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Public Agenda. Posts are plain text and can be reported.