Stichting Apotheek der Haarlemse Ziekenhuizen
- World rank, all time
- #25,358 of 42,892
- Rank in Netherlands
- #299 of 464
- Research works
- 282 ▼ 37% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 5k 17.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 9.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 20% world 28%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Earth and Planetary Sciences, 4.3×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 4.3×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 4.0×
- Psychology 3.9×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.1×
- Decision Sciences 2.1×
- Chemistry 2.0×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.9×
- Health Professions 1.7×
- Environmental Science 1.7×
- Medicine 1.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.8×
- Social Sciences 0.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Engineering 0.4×
- Arts and Humanities 0.4×
- Computer Science 0.4×
- Neuroscience 0.3×
Who are the top researchers at Stichting Apotheek der Haarlemse Ziekenhuizen?
Ranked on the composite score, Th.H. van de Velde, J. P. Lotsy and Saskia Jelgersma lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Stichting Apotheek der Haarlemse Ziekenhuizen.
- 1 Th.H. van de Velde Netherlands · #353,201 worldwide 3 citations · 26 works
- 2 J. P. Lotsy Netherlands · #1,108,242 worldwide 8 citations · 17 works
- 3 Saskia Jelgersma Netherlands · #1,156,339 worldwide 20 citations · 20 works
- 4 Marcel Verhoef Netherlands · #1,419,945 worldwide 29 citations · 16 works
Which keywords describe research at Stichting Apotheek der Haarlemse Ziekenhuizen?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Health Promotion, Cultural Diversity, Social Work, Inclusion, Professionalism, Empowerment and Research Methods.
- Cardiovascular Risk Assessment
- Tectonics
- Parenting
- Evidence-Based Practice
- Glacial Cycles
- Anxiety Disorders
- Self-Experience
- DSM
- Neuroscience
- Children
- Meta-Analysis
- Psychopathology
- Depression
- Holocene
- Treatment
- Research Methods
- Professionalism
- Social Work
- Mental Health
- Health Promotion
- Epidemiology
- Education
- Cultural Diversity
- Inclusion
- Empowerment
- Quality of Life
- Emotion Regulation
- Sea Level
- Antimicrobial Resistance
- Clinical Trials
- Sedimentation
- Psychiatric Disorders
- Phenomenology
- Embodiment
- Adolescents
- Language
- Paleoclimatology
- Mediterranean
- Developmental Trajectories
- Behavioral Problems
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology24▲ 2.1×67 topics
- Health Promotion10▲ 13×5 topics
- Education10▲ 2.7×9 topics
- Mental Health9▲ 2.9×14 topics
- Cultural Diversity9▲ 16×5 topics
- Social Work9▲ 38×2 topics
- Inclusion8▲ 24×3 topics
- Professionalism8▲ 22×2 topics
- Empowerment8▲ 32×1 topic
- Research Methods8▲ 22×1 topic
- Quality of Life8▲ 1.98×24 topics
- Treatment7▲ 1.94×19 topics
- Emotion Regulation7▲ 7.4×6 topics
- Holocene7▲ 14×2 topics
- Sea Level7▲ 16×2 topics
- Depression6▲ 2.8×6 topics
- Antimicrobial Resistance6▲ 8.0×7 topics
- Psychopathology6▲ 11×3 topics
- Clinical Trials5▲ 3.0×13 topics
- Meta-Analysis5▲ 3.5×8 topics
- Sedimentation5▲ 25×2 topics
- Children5▲ 7.0×6 topics
- Psychiatric Disorders5▲ 12×3 topics
- Neuroscience5▲ 5.6×3 topics
- Phenomenology5▲ 14×2 topics
- DSM4▲ 44×1 topic
- Embodiment4▲ 9.3×2 topics
- Self-Experience4▲ 44×1 topic
- Adolescents4▲ 4.4×5 topics
- Anxiety Disorders4▲ 12×2 topics
- Language4▲ 6.3×3 topics
- Glacial Cycles4▲ 13×1 topic
- Paleoclimatology4▲ 11×1 topic
- Evidence-Based Practice4▲ 7.9×4 topics
- Mediterranean4▲ 12×2 topics
- Parenting4▲ 9.3×2 topics
- Developmental Trajectories3▲ 9.1×2 topics
- Tectonics3▲ 7.3×3 topics
- Behavioral Problems3▲ 13×1 topic
- Cardiovascular Risk Assessment3▲ 12×2 topics
Which research topics does Stichting Apotheek der Haarlemse Ziekenhuizen publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, European Linguistics and Anthropology, earthquake and tectonic studies and Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development Clinical Psychology 1 works
- 2 European Linguistics and Anthropology Anthropology 0 works
- 3 earthquake and tectonic studies Geophysics 0 works
- 4 Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques Geophysics 0 works
- 5 Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies Safety Research 0 works
- 6 Cognitive Functions and Memory Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 0 works
- 7 Ethics in Business and Education Information Systems and Management 0 works
- 8 Identity, Memory, and Therapy Developmental and Educational Psychology 0 works
- 9 Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance Accounting 0 works
- 10 Child Therapy and Development Clinical Psychology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Stichting Apotheek der Haarlemse Ziekenhuizen's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 37% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Haarlem
- Spaarne Gasthuis
- Inholland University of Applied Sciences
- Streeklab Haarlem
- Teva Pharmaceuticals (Netherlands)
- Teylers Museum
- Access to Medicine Index
- Royal Holland Society of Sciences and Humanities
- Nederlandse Vereniging voor Gastroenterologie
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.