Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Madison · United States

Wisconsin Disability Association

In research, Wisconsin Disability Association stands highest in Social Sciences (#9,816 of 14,833 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#16,257 of 17,446 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, all time
#13,506
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#2,785
of 7,310
Research works
445
▼ 9% vs 2018-21
Citations
13k
29.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
10.7%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.13×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
41%
world 40%
International
27%
world 18%

What is Wisconsin Disability Association known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #9,816 of 14,833 13.6%162
Physical SciencesDomain #16,257 of 17,446 7.7%121

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Wisconsin Disability Association sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Wisconsin Disability Association work in?

In 2022-now, 47% of research at Wisconsin Disability Association is in Social Sciences, 22% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (27%), Health Professions (11%), Medicine (11%). It does 1.6× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 15 fractional works · 46.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 9 fractional works · 27.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 3 fractional works · 10.4% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 6.3% of its workHealth: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workCommunication: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workLinguistics and Language: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHuman Factors and Ergonomics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 2 fractional works · 7.1% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 2 fractional works · 6.2% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workMarketing: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 7 fractional works · 22.4% of its workHealth Professions: 4 fractional works · 11.4% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 4 fractional works · 10.8% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMedicine: 4 fractional works · 10.7% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 7 fractional works · 22.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 3 fractional works · 9.3% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 3.8% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workBuilding and Construction: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workAtmospheric Science: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workPaleontology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEnergy Engineering and Power Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeneral Energy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workDiscrete Mathematics and Combinatorics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBioengineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 3 fractional works · 8.6% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 5.2% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workAging: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEndocrine and Autonomic Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workALL ITS WORKWisconsinDisability…33fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences9%Physical Sciences22%Health Sciences22%Social Sciences47%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 21 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences927.3%
    2. Psychology27.1%
    3. Arts and Humanities26.2%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance13.3%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting11.6%
    6. Decision Sciences01.2%
    1. Health Professions411.4%
    2. Medicine410.7%
    3. Nursing00.2%
    1. Environmental Science39.3%
    2. Engineering13.3%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences13.0%
    4. Computer Science12.6%
    5. Energy01.5%
    6. Mathematics01.3%
    7. Physics and Astronomy01.0%
    8. Chemical Engineering00.2%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology25.2%
    2. Neuroscience01.3%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences01.1%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology01.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.23× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.98× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.01× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.78× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceChemical Engineering: 0.58× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringComputer Science: 0.33× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1.92× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 1.66× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.22× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.88× its world share, 3 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 1.16× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.46× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 4.33× its world share, 4 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.56× its world share, 4 worksMedicineNursing: 0.42× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 2.15× its world share, 2 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.49× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 1.27× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.53× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.33× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.16× its world share, 9 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 4.3×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 21 fields, with their numbers
  1. Health Professions4.33×4 works
  2. Psychology2.33×2 works
  3. Social Sciences2.16×9 works
  4. Arts and Humanities2.15×2 works
  5. Earth and Planetary Sciences1.92×1 works
  6. Environmental Science1.88×3 works
  7. Energy1.66×0 works
  8. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.53×1 works
  9. Decision Sciences1.27×0 works
  10. Mathematics1.16×0 works
  11. Immunology and Microbiology1.01×0 works
  12. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.98×2 works
  13. Neuroscience0.78×0 works
  14. Chemical Engineering0.58×0 works
  15. Medicine0.56×4 works
  16. Business, Management and Accounting0.49×0 works
  17. Physics and Astronomy0.46×0 works
  18. Nursing0.42×0 works
  19. Computer Science0.33×1 works
  20. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.23×0 works
  21. Engineering0.22×1 works

Who are the top researchers at Wisconsin Disability Association?

Ranked on the quality score, William N. Adkins, Colin Macleod and Frederick C. Cuny lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Wisconsin Disability Association.

  1. 1 William N. Adkins United States · #1,428,130 worldwide 3.2k citations · 22 works
  2. 2 Colin Macleod United States · #5,159,971 worldwide 14 citations · 16 works
  3. 3 Frederick C. Cuny United States · #6,327,740 worldwide 739 citations · 77 works
  4. 4 芳文 小林 United States · #6,980,788 worldwide 0 citations · 98 works
All ranked researchers at Wisconsin Disability Association

What are the most cited papers from Wisconsin Disability Association?

The most cited paper from Wisconsin Disability Association is "Intensive Behavioral Treatment for Children With Autism: Four-Year Outcome and Predictors" (Glen O. Sallows, Tamlynn D. Graupner, 2005), with 786 citations. Next come "Self-Determination and Positive Adult Outcomes: A Follow-up Study of Youth with Mental Retardation or Learning Disabilities" (685) and "A Framework for Assessing the Vulnerability of Communities in the Canadian Arctic to Risks Associated with Climate Change" (577).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Intensive Behavioral Treatment for Children With Autism: Four-Year Outcome and Predictors Glen O. Sallows, Tamlynn D. Graupner · American Journal on Mental Retardation 2005 786
2 Self-Determination and Positive Adult Outcomes: A Follow-up Study of Youth with Mental Retardation or Learning Disabilities Michael L. Wehmeyer, Michelle Schwartz · Exceptional Children Open access 1997 685
3 A Framework for Assessing the Vulnerability of Communities in the Canadian Arctic to Risks Associated with Climate Change James D. Ford, Barry E. Smit · ARCTIC Open access 2004 577
4 Histochemical changes in cytochrome oxidase of cortical barrels after vibrissal removal in neonatal and adult mice. Margaret T.T. Wong‐Riley, Carol Welt · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Open access Apr 1980 467
5 BioTIME: A database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene María Dornelas et al. · Global Ecology and Biogeography Open access270 authors Jul 2018 457
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Wisconsin Disability Association?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Meta-Analysis, Arctic, Vulnerability, Food Security, International Relations, Arctic Indigenous Peoples and Traditional Knowledge.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 23 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 23 words, with their numbers
  1. Climate Change5▲ 5.7×13 topics
  2. Sustainability2▲ 2.8×8 topics
  3. Meta-Analysis2▲ 10×6 topics
  4. Arctic2▲ 53×3 topics
  5. Food Security2▲ 9.5×2 topics
  6. International Relations2▲ 21×2 topics
  7. Vulnerability2▲ 22×2 topics
  8. Arctic Indigenous Peoples2▲ 276×1 topic
  9. Traditional Knowledge2▲ 113×1 topic
  10. Urban Development2▲ 13×2 topics
  11. Geopolitics1▲ 29×2 topics
  12. Governance1▲ 12×1 topic
  13. Shipping1▲ 82×1 topic
  14. Epidemiology1◆ 0.95×12 topics
  15. Mental Health1▲ 2.5×5 topics
  16. Renewable Energy1▲ 2.5×7 topics
  17. Conservation1▲ 7.7×3 topics
  18. Social Support1▲ 6.2×3 topics
  19. Globalization1▲ 1.61×4 topics
  20. Handwriting Development1▲ 284×1 topic
  21. Housing Supply1▲ 88×1 topic
  22. Mortgage Credit Expansion1▲ 88×1 topic
  23. Writing Instruction1▲ 284×1 topic

Which research topics does Wisconsin Disability Association publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Indigenous Studies and Ecology, Arctic and Russian Policy Studies, Writing and Handwriting Education and Housing Market and Economics.

  1. 1 Indigenous Studies and Ecology General Health Professions 2 works
  2. 2 Arctic and Russian Policy Studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  3. 3 Writing and Handwriting Education Education 1 works
  4. 4 Housing Market and Economics Economics and Econometrics 1 works
  5. 5 Marine animal studies overview Ecology 1 works
  6. 6 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications Building and Construction 0 works
  7. 7 EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Language and Linguistics 0 works
  8. 8 Mining and Resource Management Building and Construction 0 works
  9. 9 Multilingual Education and Policy Linguistics and Language 0 works
  10. 10 International Student and Expatriate Challenges Communication 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available41.4%not open58.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors27.0%domestic only73.0%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Wisconsin Disability Association's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 9% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Wisconsin Disability Association as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000078% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%0.0030%Wisconsin Disability Association0.00012% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Wisconsin Disability Association over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Madison

All research institutions in Madison

Share Wisconsin Disability Association's ranking

Wisconsin Disability Association on Science Explorer

A card with Wisconsin Disability Association's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Wisconsin Disability Association. Posts are plain text and can be reported.