Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Philosophy

Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis

Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis is a research topic within Philosophy. Science Explorer counts 1,000 research works in it since 1951. 11.3% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics including probability, philosophy, randomness, collective joy, imperialism, telegraph, cosmopolitanism, cultural encounter, and bioethics. The papers delve into the implications of probability in various fields and explore philosophical perspectives on historical events and cultural phenomena.

  • Probability
  • Philosophy
  • Randomness
  • Collective Joy
  • Inductive Reasoning
  • Imperialism
  • Telegraph
  • Cosmopolitanism
  • Cultural Encounter
  • Bioethics
Research works
1,000
fractional, since 1951
In the world top 10%
113
per year above
Top-10% rate
11.3%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
-30%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis research?

By volume, the United States and Poland publish the most (33 and 18 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 33 works
  2. 2 Poland 18 works
  3. 3 United Kingdom 11 works
  4. 4 China 6 works
  5. 5 India 4 works
  6. 6 Australia 4 works
  7. 7 France 4 works
  8. 8 Indonesia 4 works
  9. 9 Russia 4 works
  10. 10 Iraq 4 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 35.9%Poland: 19.4%United Kingdom: 11.8%China: 6.7%6 others listed: 26.1%36%largest
United States33 · 35.9%Poland18 · 19.4%United Kingdom11 · 11.8%China6 · 6.7%6 others listed24 · 26.1%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Tasmania publishes the most Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis research, followed by SUNY Westchester Community College and Jagiellonian University.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 University of TasmaniaAustralia 4 works
  2. 2 SUNY Westchester Community CollegeUnited States 2 works
  3. 3 Jagiellonian UniversityPoland 2 works
  4. 4 Adam Mickiewicz University in PoznańPoland 2 works
  5. 5 University of WrocławPoland 2 works
  6. 6 University at Buffalo, State University of New YorkUnited States 2 works
  7. 7 University of WarsawPoland 2 works
  8. 8 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 1 works
  9. 9 University of ŁódźPoland 1 works
  10. 10 University of Notre DameUnited States 1 works

Where is Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis research done?

The largest centres of Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis research in 2022–2025 are Warsaw (Poland), Hobart (Australia), Krakow (Poland) and London (United Kingdom). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in New York and London.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Warsaw Poland 4 works
  2. 2 Hobart Australia 4 works
  3. 3 Krakow Poland 3 works
  4. 4 London United Kingdom 3 works
  5. 5 Istanbul Türkiye 3 works
  6. 6 Valhalla United States 2 works
  7. 7 Beijing China 2 works
  8. 8 Łódź Poland 2 works
  9. 9 Poznań Poland 2 works
  10. 10 Wrocław Poland 2 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. New YorkUS · 20.3 works2.2×
  2. LondonGB · 24.6 works1.8×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis than the world average.

See Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis on the map

Is Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 30% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.